The W
Views: 99016573
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Calendar | Color chart | Log in for more!
18.9.14 1900
The W - Pro Wrestling - RAW Mid-Year Report Card (Page 2)
This thread has 7 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
Thread rated: 3.50
Pages: Prev 1 2
(6361 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (28 total)
chill
Landjager








Since: 18.5.02

Since last post: 2652 days
Last activity: 2652 days
#21 Posted on | Instant Rating: 1.93
During Test's last stay, I was enjoying him for the most part. Hell, I was actually happy to see him walk out, because he was really coming into his own as a cocky heel. This was while he was injured and such. A lot will disagree on principle with this, but Test showed some pretty good potential as an actor last time around. I look forward to his return. His wrestling improved over the last year, and if he expands his moveset a little more to avoid becoming "just another hoss," then good things may be in his future.
TL_Hopper
Salami








Since: 5.7.03

Since last post: 2868 days
Last activity: 2722 days
AIM:  
#22 Posted on | Instant Rating: 2.14
Heidenreich an F, but Val Venis gets an N/A? Come on, I know no one likes him, but Val at least gets a match every couple weeks, while I don't even think Heidenreich has been on TV in 2004. Give him a friggin' chance.



When I was nine I had a crush on Scott Baio.
chill
Landjager








Since: 18.5.02

Since last post: 2652 days
Last activity: 2652 days
#23 Posted on | Instant Rating: 1.93
    Originally posted by TL_Hopper
    Heidenreich an F, but Val Venis gets an N/A? Come on, I know no one likes him, but Val at least gets a match every couple weeks, while I don't even think Heidenreich has been on TV in 2004. Give him a friggin' chance.


haha, you're free to write your own report card. i don't watch HEAT, so the n/a's were mostly given to people I hadn't seen wrestle in a long time. it's a SUBJECTIVE opinion, so you're free to disagree by writing your own grades.

n/a stands for not applicable. it's not an insult to Val, if you knew what the term means.

(edited by chill on 20.6.04 2134)
KaneRobot
4-time W of the Day!








Since: 24.2.02
From: Bowels

Since last post: 2390 days
Last activity: 1683 days
#24 Posted on | Instant Rating: 1.98
HHH and Coachman too high (especially Coachman, who is straining for a B-), Hurricane too low.

However, I do agree on Hurricane being a heel. I just don't think he needs to ditch the superhero thing to do it. I'd rather see a "bastard heel" with something that sets him apart from others than just some skinny guy who is an asshole.




The First Five Game Sweep In Finals History
TL_Hopper
Salami








Since: 5.7.03

Since last post: 2868 days
Last activity: 2722 days
AIM:  
#25 Posted on | Instant Rating: 2.14
    Originally posted by chill
      Originally posted by TL_Hopper
      Heidenreich an F, but Val Venis gets an N/A? Come on, I know no one likes him, but Val at least gets a match every couple weeks, while I don't even think Heidenreich has been on TV in 2004. Give him a friggin' chance.


    haha, you're free to write your own report card. i don't watch HEAT, so the n/a's were mostly given to people I hadn't seen wrestle in a long time. it's a SUBJECTIVE opinion, so you're free to disagree by writing your own grades.

    n/a stands for not applicable. it's not an insult to Val, if you knew what the term means.

    (edited by chill on 20.6.04 2134)


I know what N/A means, you're missing my point. Val HAS been on TV enough to warrant a grade, but Heidenreich hasn't. Your mileage may vary.



When I was nine I had a crush on Scott Baio.
liamph
Medisterpoelse








Since: 21.6.04

Since last post: 3724 days
Last activity: 3724 days
#26 Posted on | Instant Rating: 0.00
    Originally posted by TL_Hopper
      Originally posted by chill
        Originally posted by TL_Hopper
        Heidenreich an F, but Val Venis gets an N/A? Come on, I know no one likes him, but Val at least gets a match every couple weeks, while I don't even think Heidenreich has been on TV in 2004. Give him a friggin' chance.


      haha, you're free to write your own report card. i don't watch HEAT, so the n/a's were mostly given to people I hadn't seen wrestle in a long time. it's a SUBJECTIVE opinion, so you're free to disagree by writing your own grades.

      n/a stands for not applicable. it's not an insult to Val, if you knew what the term means.

      (edited by chill on 20.6.04 2134)


    I know what N/A means, you're missing my point. Val HAS been on TV enough to warrant a grade, but Heidenreich hasn't. Your mileage may vary.


I'm not missing any point. I am fully aware that Val has been on TV. Just not mine. I'm not going to do the typical thing done on here and give my opinion about someone when I haven't seen their work recently. I've seen all of Heidenreich's televised matches... why am I defending my own opinion to you? If you don't like mine, do your own report card. Otherwise, I'm not interested.
CRZ
Big Brother
Administrator








Since: 9.12.01
From: ミネアポリス

Since last post: 6 hours
Last activity: 2 hours
AIM:  
ICQ:  
Y!:
#27 Posted on | Instant Rating: 9.07
    Originally posted by liamph
    I'm not missing any point. I am fully aware that Val has been on TV. Just not mine. I'm not going to do the typical thing done on here and give my opinion about someone when I haven't seen their work recently. I've seen all of Heidenreich's televised matches... why am I defending my own opinion to you? If you don't like mine, do your own report card. Otherwise, I'm not interested.
I'm really confused because this is your FIRST post. Did you make an opinion with some other account that I missed? If so, why register ANOTHER account?



CRZ
TL_Hopper
Salami








Since: 5.7.03

Since last post: 2868 days
Last activity: 2722 days
AIM:  
#28 Posted on | Instant Rating: 2.14
    Originally posted by liamph
      Originally posted by TL_Hopper
        Originally posted by chill
          Originally posted by TL_Hopper
          Heidenreich an F, but Val Venis gets an N/A? Come on, I know no one likes him, but Val at least gets a match every couple weeks, while I don't even think Heidenreich has been on TV in 2004. Give him a friggin' chance.


        haha, you're free to write your own report card. i don't watch HEAT, so the n/a's were mostly given to people I hadn't seen wrestle in a long time. it's a SUBJECTIVE opinion, so you're free to disagree by writing your own grades.

        n/a stands for not applicable. it's not an insult to Val, if you knew what the term means.

        (edited by chill on 20.6.04 2134)


      I know what N/A means, you're missing my point. Val HAS been on TV enough to warrant a grade, but Heidenreich hasn't. Your mileage may vary.


    I'm not missing any point. I am fully aware that Val has been on TV. Just not mine. I'm not going to do the typical thing done on here and give my opinion about someone when I haven't seen their work recently. I've seen all of Heidenreich's televised matches... why am I defending my own opinion to you? If you don't like mine, do your own report card. Otherwise, I'm not interested.


Heidenreich's last Raw appearance was on November 3, 2003. You gave him an F when he hasn't been on Raw in 8 months, while Val at least gets squashed every few weeks.



When I was nine I had a crush on Scott Baio.
Pages: Prev 1 2
Thread rated: 3.50
Pages: Prev 1 2
Thread ahead: Serious ways to improve Kenzo Suzuki
Next thread: TNA Impact rating
Previous thread: The Great Thomas SmackDown! Report (6/17/04)
(6361 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
Please no. We don't want Kidman on Raw. I don't get UPN, so I have to miss out on Eddie, Rey and Benoit. It's bad enough without having to see even more shitty wrestlers on TNN. Howzabout this? You keep Kidman, but you can have 3MW for Los Guerreros!...
Related threads: Raw 6-14-04 - Lita is pregnant - RAW WORKRATE Report 6/7/04 - More...
The W - Pro Wrestling - RAW Mid-Year Report Card (Page 2)Register and log in to post!

The W™ message board

ZimBoard
©2001-2014 Brothers Zim

This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.954 seconds.