The W
Views: 99094471
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Calendar | Color chart | Log in for more!
21.9.14 0716
The W - the-w.com Site Feedback - Ratings Threshold and "Ignored by" Number Register and log in to post!
Thread rated: 7.54
Pages: 1
(493 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (2 total)
Gugs
Bierwurst








Since: 9.7.02
From: Sleep (That's where I'm a viking)

Since last post: 486 days
Last activity: 12 days
AIM:  
Y!:
#1 Posted on | Instant Rating: 5.79
Basically, is there a correlation between the two? If I were to set my "What is the lowest user rating from which you wish to view posts?" to 6, would everyone with a rating below 6 have their "Ignored by" number go up one?



This will get added at the end of each post you make, below an horizontal line. This should preferably be kept to a small enough size.
Promote this thread!
CRZ
Big Brother
Administrator








Since: 9.12.01
From: ミネアポリス

Since last post: 14 hours
Last activity: 4 hours
AIM:  
ICQ:  
Y!:
#2 Posted on | Instant Rating: 9.30
    Originally posted by Gugs
    Basically, is there a correlation between the two? If I were to set my "What is the lowest user rating from which you wish to view posts?" to 6, would everyone with a rating below 6 have their "Ignored by" number go up one?
Nope - that number only counts people who have explicitly ignored somebody and doesn't pay attention to threshholds.



CRZ
Thread rated: 7.54
Pages: 1
Thread ahead: MSN Messenger?
Next thread: MERRY CHRISTMAS - Buddy list finally implemented
Previous thread: Amazon Popup Not Working
(493 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
Well, I'm guessing that at 2000 posts or so, the rank will be "Sterile" due to all the nifty radiation!
- Freeway, New rank (2002)
Related threads: MERRY CHRISTMAS - Buddy list finally implemented - the-w.com topics of interest: November 2005 - My hopes! - More...
The W - the-w.com Site Feedback - Ratings Threshold and "Ignored by" NumberRegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board

ZimBoard
©2001-2014 Brothers Zim

This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.104 seconds.