The W
Views: 133099294
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Calendar | Color chart | Log in for more!
20.5.18 0913
The W - Guest Columns - Rat Bastards Register and log in to post!
Pages: 1(868 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
Post (2 total)

Since: 26.6.02
From: York, England

Since last post: 5178 days
Last activity: 5121 days
#1 Posted on
Let's see what the HHH 'fans' have to say about this bit 3 years ago from Greg.

    But, while we're on that subject, how hard is it to understand why the WWF is doing so well? It's really simple. They have a unbiased, unattached group of writers who weave storylines. That's it. They throw out a bunch of stories and go with what works. Sure they stumble occasionally, everyone does, but they put business first. They don't book for personal reasons. Friends of the writers aren't given priority in storylines, or handed titles, or given cushy slots on Monday Night programming. Instead they book based on fan reactions in the arenas and through tv ratings. What a novel concept? Right?=20's simple.

...full of energy. Multi-orgasmic, if you will, in a cosmic sort of way."
Promote this thread!
Lap cheong

Since: 1.8.02
From: Huntington Beach, CA

Since last post: 2620 days
Last activity: 20 days
#2 Posted on
That might have been true, and it does make a lot of sense, but it is definitly no longer the case! So were any writers three years ago doing wrestlers?

Craig Reade
"Pool Boy"

Chris Jericho stole my beard. That is right, I had it first.
Pages: 1Thread ahead: A Cure for the Common Fan
Next thread: The Bart Gunn Story
Previous thread: The New Generation
(868 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
Good Evening Ladies and Gentlemen, and welcome to this edition of the Raw Lines for Monday, April 4th, 2005. Being that Wrestlemania and Raw were in Los Angeles, I have to wonder how it was that I didn't get out to either live event.
- LinearRO, Lines: Rw - StC - 4Apr05 (2005)
The W - Guest Columns - Rat BastardsRegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board

©2001-2018 Brothers Zim

This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.193 seconds.