User Post (5 total)
CajunMan Boudin blanc No longer registered Since: 2.1.02 From: Give me a Title shot! Since last post: 2319 days Last activity: 1457 days # 1 Posted on 13.6.08 1452.19 | Instant Rating: 1.91 http://www.tmz.com/2008/06/13/r-kelly-not-guilty-urine-the-clear/ Damn! Promote this thread!
It's False Scrapple Since: 20.6.02 From: I am the Tag Team Champions! Since last post: 549 days Last activity: 338 days # 2 Posted on 17.6.08 0535.56 | Instant Rating: 2.05 But...that's him on the tape! He's RIGHT THERE! You're telling me 12 people couldn't look at a clear copy of that video and conclude that it was R. Fucking Kelly? I hate celebrity justice. You will believe a man can fly
Guru Zim SQL Dejection Administrator Since: 9.12.01 From: Bay City, OR Since last post: 19 days Last activity: 3 days
ICQ: # 3 Posted on 17.6.08 1045.58 | Instant Rating: 8.04 The defense hinged around a mole that wasn't on the tape, that was on R Kelly. Obviously, I haven't seen the child sex tape. I'm assuming that the jury was paying attention, though. Sign up for Folding@Home and join our team. PM me for details. Ignorance is bliss for you, hell for me.
spf Scrapple Since: 2.1.02 From: The Las Vegas of Canada Since last post: 846 days Last activity: 266 days # 4 Posted on 17.6.08 1111.49 | Instant Rating: 5.16 A lot of the talk we heard on the news here was that jurors weren't so much unsure about it being R. Kelly as they weren't convinced that the girl on the tape was the one the prosecution was claiming, so they weren't convinced that the girl on the tape was underage. 2007 W-League Fantasy Football champion!
StaggerLee Scrapple Since: 3.10.02 From: Right side of the tracks Since last post: 67 days Last activity: 37 days # 5 Posted on 17.6.08 1138.19 | Instant Rating: 3.10
The girl denied it was her the entire time.
I think I prefer this lineup to Coachella, which amazes me since normally I hear Bonaroo and I think "patchouli-stinking potheads" But man...
The W message board ZimBoard ©2001-2018 Brothers Zim
This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.184 seconds.