The W
Views: 98500729
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Calendar | Color chart | Log in for more!
28.8.14 1833
The W - Football - possible fantasy trade
This thread has 2 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
Thread rated: 4.97
Pages: 1
(1576 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (4 total)
count olaf
Goetta








Since: 15.7.02

Since last post: 3433 days
Last activity: 3430 days
#1 Posted on
I've got no running game whatsoever. There's a lot of possibility in Barlow, Griffiths, Suggs, McGahee and Tatum Bell but not too many points. So my plan is to trade away Peyton Manning in exchange for a top running back. Manning is my highest-paid player so he can only be traded for another team's high man.

Another team wants to get peyton and has dangled Ahman Green and tom brady. Salaries dictate that to do this deal, I have to offer manning and barlow. What do you think of this deal? I don't concern myself so much with losing manning if i get brady on top of david carr, whose on my bench. I just don't know about Green and his fumbles vs. any potential from Barlow.

(edited by count olaf on 16.10.04 1618)


The Black Panthers sponsored a free breakfast program for children, sickle-cell anemia tests, free food and shoes, and a school, the Samuel Napier Intercommunal Youth Institute.

Promote this thread!
Freeway
Scrapple








Since: 3.1.02
From: Calgary

Since last post: 249 days
Last activity: 6 hours
#2 Posted on | Instant Rating: 6.36
(deleted by Freeway420 on 16.10.04 1440)
evilwaldo
Lap cheong








Since: 7.2.02
From: New York, NY

Since last post: 3352 days
Last activity: 3132 days
AIM:  
#3 Posted on | Instant Rating: 0.00
What are the makeups of each roster?

I drafted both Culpepper and Manning in my fantasy league. I had no running game but was able to trade Manning and players for Moss and players. My running game may be mediocre but the rest of the team is solid and someone can be used for trade bait as the deadline approaches.



Are you a professional halfwit or talented amateur?
StaggerLee
Scrapple








Since: 3.10.02
From: Right side of the tracks

Since last post: 2 days
Last activity: 1 hour
#4 Posted on | Instant Rating: 2.97
Take teh trade, Barlow has done dick this season, Brady wont get many if any INTs and Green may do better, if he can get a handle on the football.
BigVitoMark
Lap cheong








Since: 10.8.02
From: Queen's University, Canada

Since last post: 3322 days
Last activity: 3231 days
ICQ:  
#5 Posted on | Instant Rating: 5.14
I don't think that's a bad trade. Ahman Green's not gonna have problems all season, although if their defense doesn't pick it up their running game may not be allowed to be much of a factor. I've got both Brady and Manning in (one of) the W league, and week to week they've been comparable...if you take the extremes of Peyton vs. the Pack and Brady vs. the Dolphins out of the equation. I'd take the trade, because not one of your RBs looks to be worthwhile.

Has anyone grabbed Droughns yet in your league? His 190 yards last week should have him in Quentin Griffin's spot until he does something to lose it.



Screw Ricky
Thread rated: 4.97
Pages: 1
Thread ahead: I see someone already has a FireMikeSherman.com website
Next thread: ESPN parts ways with Kiper??
Previous thread: Deadskins
(1576 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
I think the conclusion that the end is near either way regarding this decision is false. Had the NFL prevailed, it COULD have tried to use the "we're one entity" in negotiations. But, they already do that, so no big deal.
Related threads: New survival league - priest holmes or corey dillon - Salary Cap League - Last call! - More...
The W - Football - possible fantasy tradeRegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board

ZimBoard
©2001-2014 Brothers Zim

This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.108 seconds.