The W
Views: 98939460
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Calendar | Color chart | Log in for more!
16.9.14 1246
The W - Baseball - Playoff predictions thread! (Page 2)
This thread has 3 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
Thread rated: 4.94
Pages: Prev 1 2
(595 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (26 total)
Texas Kelly
Lap cheong








Since: 3.1.02
From: FOREST HILLS CONTROLS THE UNIVERSE

Since last post: 12 days
Last activity: 1 day
ICQ:  
#21 Posted on | Instant Rating: 4.01
Ladies and gentlemen, the following public service message is brought to you by your friends from D-Generation X, who would like to remind each and every one of you that if you're not down with that, we've got two words for you...

DIVISIONAL SERIES

Yankees over Tigers in 3. The Yankees handled Detroit easily during the regular season, and that was when the Tigers weren't struggling and the Yankees were dealing with injuries.

Twins over A's in 5. A's continue their grand tradition of first-round choke jobs (four straight from 2000-2003) by winning the first two in Minnesota and losing three in a row.

Mets over Dodgers in 4. The Mets' pitching was fine for a good portion of the season without Pedro, and the Dodgers don't have a quality lefthander to counter the Mets' lineup with.

Padres over Cardinals in 5. Probably the most even matchup of the first round. Home field and the lull St. Louis came into these playoffs on gives San Diego the edge.

CHAMPIONSHIP SERIES

Yankees over Twins in 6. The Yankees have had Minnesota's number over the years, and Santana is the only real threat to the Yankees' lineup. He wins two, New York wins the rest.

Mets over Padres in 6. Wells & Embree are the only hopes San Diego has to keep this one close. Mets dominated the season series, which doesn't bode well for San Diego.

WORLD SERIES

Yankees over Mets in 6. It won't be as one-sided as earlier series was, but the Yankees are stocked with quality lefty middle relief that will kill the Mets in crunch time.

(Disclaimer: Picking the Yankees to win is predicate in great part on Randy Johnson being able to perform. Should Johnson come up lame and the Yankees bow out, the balance tilts towards the Mets winning since neither the Twins nor the Tigers have the lefty pitching depth the Yankees do.)



e-mail me at texas (dot) kelly (at) gmailread a bunch of incoherent nonsense
now 52% more incoherent!
smark/net attack Advisory System is Elevatedsmark/net attack Advisory System Status is: Elevated
(Holds; June 18, 2006)
While the switch from Cena to RVD should alleviate some complaints, the inevitability of the belt's return to Cena (note where Summerslam is this year) and the poor initial showing by the new ECW are enough to keep the indicator where it is for now. The pieces are in place, though, especially on RAW, for improvements to be made to the IWC's psyche in the near future.
Lexus
Bierwurst








Since: 2.1.02
From: Stafford, VA

Since last post: 7 days
Last activity: 1 hour
AIM:  
#22 Posted on | Instant Rating: 4.73
Twins/A's - Twins in 3. They're too hot.

Yankees/Tigers - I remember something I told a friend of mine at the beginning of the season. 'Detroit's looking fantastic, but I think that'll peter out by the end of the season'. Besides, the day Detroit gets a triple crown (I am confident in their basketball and hockey clubs) is the day hell freezes. Besides, I'm a Yankees fan. Yanks in 4.

Padres/Cardinals - Anybody could call this Padres/Pujols and they'd be a hundred percent accurate. Padres in 5, only because Albert carries 2 good games.

Mets/Dodgers - This is too close for me to call. Pedro's been out a fair amount this season, so I don't see him as a factor. I honestly can not assess a pick.



Hold nothing sacred and you'll never be dissapointed. Especially not this statement.
Wpob
Lap cheong








Since: 21.11.02
From: Williston Park, NY

Since last post: 2 days
Last activity: 8 hours
#23 Posted on | Instant Rating: 3.39
Twins over As in 4
Tigers over Yankees in 5

Dodgers over Mets in 4
Padres over Cardinals in 4

Twins over Tigers in 6
Padres over Dodgers in 7

Twins over Padres in 5





...that motherfucker is always spiked with pain.....
Reverend J Shaft
Liverwurst








Since: 25.6.03
From: Home of The Big House

Since last post: 4 days
Last activity: 1 hour
#24 Posted on | Instant Rating: 5.01
Tigers over Yankees in 4
Twins over As in 4

Dodgers over Mets in 5
Padres over Cardinals in 4

Tigers over Twins in 6
Padres over Dodgers in 6

In a rematch of the '84 series, the result is the same:

Tigers over Padres in 5

MedallaGuy
Head cheese








Since: 12.1.02
From: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Since last post: 499 days
Last activity: 12 days
AIM:  
#25 Posted on | Instant Rating: 3.41
Let's see...

Yanks over Tigers 4
A's over Twins in 4

Dodgers over Mets in 5
Cards over Pads in 5

A's over Yanks in 6
Dodgers over Cards in 5

A's over Cards in 6
...
whaaaaaaaa...
...



Puerto Rico...fighting for 3rd place on the World Baseball Classic!
SchippeWreck
Banger








Since: 26.3.03
From: Glendale, CA

Since last post: 1 day
Last activity: 2 hours
#26 Posted on | Instant Rating: 7.43
Yankees over Tigers in 5
Twins over A's in 3

Dodgers over Mets in 3 (Yeah, I said it.)
Padres over Cardinals in 5

Yankees over Twins in 7
Dodgers over Padres in 6 (Hopefully erasing the stigma of the tied finish in the regular season.)

And Dodgers over Yankees in 7, just to see that damn clock on Dodger Blues (May be NSFW, depending on what pic they have up when you click.) finally get reset.



My mom says sigs are bad for you.
Pages: Prev 1 2
Thread rated: 4.94
Pages: Prev 1 2
Thread ahead: Garciaparra, Thome are YOUR comeback players of the year
Next thread: Buck O'Neil dead at 94
Previous thread: Cleanup in Aisle Wrigley!
(595 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
Now that the Curse is over, I guess Dan needs to create new controversies.
- odessasteps, Red Sox want ball back (2005)
The W - Baseball - Playoff predictions thread! (Page 2)Register and log in to post!

The W™ message board

ZimBoard
©2001-2014 Brothers Zim

This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.138 seconds.