The W
Views: 95672032
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Calendar | Color chart | Log in for more!
20.4.14 0047
The W - Internet & Computers - Photo sharing sites
This thread has 9 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
Thread rated: 7.43
Pages: 1
(44 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (7 total)
emma
Cherries > Peaches








Since: 1.8.02
From: Phoenix-ish

Since last post: 25 days
Last activity: 22 hours
#1 Posted on | Instant Rating: 9.11
Who do we like for photo sharing ? Now that MobileMe has evaporated, I have several friends looking for a recommendation. Unfortunately, it's not anything I have experience with.

Doesn't necessarily have to be free -- anything up to $40 per year is acceptable, as long as they do a good job. Need some model of grouping & organising pictures (eg. folders or albums), & some degree of access control per group (passwords would be better than just secrecy). Most common use case would be "here's a link to the album with the pictures of yesterday's dinner party" emailed to the guest list.

Should play nicely with Mac/iPhoto, & should be intuitive enough to not intimidate technophobes.

(Facebook makes me cranky, so that's off the table.)

The users I've got aren't interested in links suitable for twitter, etc, but if it does that well, that'd be a plus.

So, what does the collective experience of The W have for me? Or what other requirements do we need to clarify?

(Thanks in advance.)
Promote this thread!
wannaberockstar
Bockwurst








Since: 7.3.02
From: MA

Since last post: 7 days
Last activity: 7 days
AIM:  
ICQ:  
#2 Posted on | Instant Rating: 3.39
If you're into iCloud (since you mentioned Mac/iPhone), then once iOS6 (and I'm presuming Mountain Lion comes out), they'll be offering shared photo streams (with those outside of iCloud being able to view on the web).

I've never actually used MobileMe, so I'm not certain to what extent you were used to but here's the preview on Apple's site.

http://www.apple.com/ios/ios6//#photostreams
StaggerLee
Scrapple








Since: 3.10.02
From: Right side of the tracks

Since last post: 2 days
Last activity: 3 hours
AIM:  
Y!:
#3 Posted on | Instant Rating: 1.98
Well, what do you have against photobucket?



YOUR 2012 NCCA Tournament Bracket Challenge Winner
CRZ
Big Brother
Administrator








Since: 9.12.01
From: ミネアポリス

Since last post: 5 hours
Last activity: 1 hour
AIM:  
ICQ:  
Y!:
#4 Posted on | Instant Rating: 9.39
If you can put aside your crankiness, Facebook's actually pretty good for free.

If you CAN'T put aside your crankiness, Diaspora* is pretty much tied into cubbi.es, so you could use that and be on an anti-Facebook high horse at the same time. (If you need an in to get a D* account, I can hook you up.)

If you're looking for something that isn't Facebook which people have heard of, there's always Google+, which works well with my Android phone but may not work as well with an iPhone. (Or maybe it does! I have no idea!)

Getting away from sites tied to other social sites, I have heard good things about 500px but I haven't really used it due to its limits in the free version (10 photos/week)

Flickr is still the king if you're paying, not so good if you're using it for free (I believe they still limit you to 200 photos on the free version)

And there's probably others if I weren't going off the top of my head.



Guru Zim
SQL Dejection
Administrator








Since: 9.12.01
From: Bay City, OR

Since last post: 2 days
Last activity: 10 hours
AIM:  
#5 Posted on | Instant Rating: 9.57
Is picasa dead? Google bought it a while back - it should be pretty useful if it is still around.




Sign up for Folding@Home and join our team. PM me for details.

Ignorance is bliss for you, hell for me.
CRZ
Big Brother
Administrator








Since: 9.12.01
From: ミネアポリス

Since last post: 5 hours
Last activity: 1 hour
AIM:  
ICQ:  
Y!:
#6 Posted on | Instant Rating: 9.39
    Originally posted by Guru Zim
    Is picasa dead? Google bought it a while back - it should be pretty useful if it is still around.
It's mostly dead - as "Google Photos," it's more of a gateway to Google+ than anything now.



emma
Cherries > Peaches








Since: 1.8.02
From: Phoenix-ish

Since last post: 25 days
Last activity: 22 hours
#7 Posted on | Instant Rating: 9.12
Thanks for the suggestions, guys!

Looks like I'm not going to be able to hand out a tidy, "one stop shopping" solution, am I?

For my most technophobic friend, I'm thinking the $25 Flickr. Flickr & Facebook seem to be built into iPhoto on the Mac, so it should be the most seamless. And the model seems like something I can explain succinctly, with minimal weirdnesses.

As I was looking around at wannaberockstar's suggestion about shared streams under iOS6, I stumbled over the "Journal" (apple.com) concept from (the relatively new) iPhoto for iOS. (Not to be confused with the Photos app that came bundled with the iPad/iPhone. And which has a different feature set than iPhoto for Mac. Yeesh.) Theoretically, one should be able to artfully arrange the photos, then publish to a web page on iCloud for sharing with anybody. That might actually work best for the friend who's bonded to her iPad. I'll have to play around with it, but it sounds promising for her needs.

I embrace my crankiness as intrinsic to my personality. However, my very tall horse & I think cubbi.es & Diaspora look very cool -- I'll need to carve some time to look into it! Meanwhile, I might have to play around with the free version of 500px, & see how it really behaves.

Thanks again!
Thread rated: 7.43
Pages: 1
Thread ahead: Can someone answer a dumb Skype question for me?
Next thread: Pretty good Mac software bundle
Previous thread: Upcoming phone releases
(44 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
http://www.top-tech-news.com/news/story.xhtml?story_id=0210023DJVFF A fix is on the way already, and Mozilla has added, "users who have not added sites to their "software whitelists" should not be at risk".
The W - Internet & Computers - Photo sharing sitesRegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board

ZimBoard
©2001-2014 Brothers Zim

This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.087 seconds.