I think Striker had some problems keeping track of the legal men in the opening six-man - not once but TWICE he said Swagger should have gone for the cover on JTG (and boy, that powerbomb looked like JTG needed some more extension to not take the brunt of the impact on his shoulder/collarbone)...except neither of those dudes were legal. Say what you want about it, but you gotta admit that the "WWE style" is all about making sure the two legal men are the ones involved in the decision.
Also, I'm not a big fan of injecting politics into the commentary - even when a conservative's doing it. Striker needs to consider a little more self-editing when picking his spots... and perhaps not use Prop 8 as one of them.
Originally posted by CRZAlso, I'm not a big fan of injecting politics into the commentary - even when a conservative's doing it. Striker needs to consider a little more self-editing when picking his spots... and perhaps not use Prop 8 as one of them.
Yeah, Striker and Grisham have made gay jokes like that for the past couple weeks... I feel like this might end up biting them in the ass.
I was a little disappointed with Hardy/Finlay. I mean, it was pretty good, but I know they can do better. I still remember a match they had on Smackdown about a year ago (maybe a little longer) that was one of my favorite matches of last year.
Originally posted by Tenken347I was a little disappointed with Hardy/Finlay. I mean, it was pretty good, but I know they can do better. I still remember a match they had on Smackdown about a year ago (maybe a little longer) that was one of my favorite matches of last year.
It'd probably help not to have two long ad breaks in the middle of the match. It would be interesting to see a PPV match between the two.
About Scott Hall falling off the ramp..it reminds me of something.. I remember during a summer 2000 RAW the Undertaker nearly drove his motorcycle over the side of the ramp because he wasn't paying attention..