The W
June 7, 2009 - birthdaybritney.jpg
Views: 178992382
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Calendar | Color chart | Log in for more!
28.3.24 0606
The W - Baseball - Mr. Kearns go to Washington, Ponson to Yanks
This thread has 1 referral leading to it
Register and log in to post!
Thread rated: 5.24
Pages: 1
(672 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (12 total)
edoug
Summer sausage








Since: 13.2.04
From: Maine

Since last post: 3206 days
Last activity: 176 days
#1 Posted on | Instant Rating: 3.73
Austin kearns to Wash.
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=2518314

Aren't the Reds still in the race. Really can't understand the reasons for this one.

Ponson to New York
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=2518391

Ponson will fold like a tent in the Bronx.







Promote this thread!
Brian P. Dermody
Liverwurst
Moderator








Since: 20.9.02
From: New York, NY

Since last post: 4381 days
Last activity: 3803 days
#2 Posted on | Instant Rating: 8.30
Ponson had best consider ritual suicide at this point. He's going to go to pieces so fast that Jeff Weaver will look like Andy Pettitte by comparison.

Is this Steinbrenner's way of getting the heat off A-Rod?



"Ed Ferrara doesn't pay for sex."


Reward TV -- TV just got better!

Quezzy
Scrapple








Since: 6.1.02
From: Pittsburgh, PA

Since last post: 1908 days
Last activity: 1907 days
#3 Posted on | Instant Rating: 3.46
A lot of people are saying that the Yanks are finally going to miss the playoffs this year, but the Red Sox needed that streak where they were awesome to move ahead of the Yanks, who have one good starter and half their offense injured, by just three games. I think it's a lot of wishful thinking, it won't take a lot for the Yankees to get back in first. So I don't think it's a bad move to get Ponson, they didn't have to give up anyone and they're the Yankees, they have limitless amount of money. Sure Ponson may suck, but last year they did the same thing picking up crappy pitchers throwing them out there and seeing what sticks. It worked last year so why not try it again.





Lance's Response:

THAT IS AWESOME!
drjayphd
Scrapple
Moderator








Since: 22.4.02
From: New Hampshire

Since last post: 766 days
Last activity: 350 days
ICQ:  
#4 Posted on | Instant Rating: 7.06
You wanted the best, you got... Out of Context Quote of the Week.

"I'll pull for the Walcott girl..." (Nuclear Winter)


Any word on the ATF raiding Krivsky's office? I mean, ye gods, you don't give up Kearns and Lopez for league-average pitchers. I think they seriously think that's the kind of move they need to make to make the playoffs. Cincinnati, I'm sorry about your front office.



It's False
Scrapple








Since: 20.6.02
From: I am the Tag Team Champions!

Since last post: 2199 days
Last activity: 581 days
#5 Posted on | Instant Rating: 5.32
I know the Yankees have it bad with Pavano on the shelf and Johnson past his prime, but do they really think Ponson is the answer? I would have taken my chances on bringing up one of the prospects, especially in light of Jonathan Palpelbon's success in Boston.

And am I the only one who thinks (or maybe hopes) that somehow Toronto will steal the division?




redsoxnation
Scrapple








Since: 24.7.02

Since last post: 3923 days
Last activity: 3923 days
#6 Posted on | Instant Rating: 3.44
    Originally posted by It's False
    And am I the only one who thinks (or maybe hopes) that somehow Toronto will steal the division?









If the division and/or Wild Card was in the 88-90 win range, I could see Toronto getting in. Looking at the numbers at the break though, it looks like it will take at least 95-96 wins to get the AL East and the Wild Card might actually be 96-97 wins. To get to 95, Toronto has to go 18 over after the break, while Boston would have to go 8 over during that time period and the Yankees 14 over to reach 95.
As for Ponson with the Yankees: This has a better chance of turning into Kevin Brown at the end or the Esteban Loiza Yankee fiasco rather than the Small/Chacon lightning in a bottle they caught last summer.

(edited by redsoxnation on 13.7.06 2320)
dunkndollaz
Banger








Since: 3.1.02
From: Northern NJ

Since last post: 1648 days
Last activity: 1104 days
#7 Posted on | Instant Rating: 7.14
I think it is safe to say that the Yankees grabbed Ponson just so the Red Sox (who also put in a waiver claim) couldn't get him - not that I can see why anyone would want him......The yanks & sax are both "playing without a net" this season. It's the Division Title or no playoffs since the Wild Card is going to go to Detroit or Chicago.



Hey Crab Man !
BigSteve
Pepperoni








Since: 23.7.04
From: Baltimore, MD

Since last post: 6285 days
Last activity: 6013 days
#8 Posted on | Instant Rating: 6.20
The Ponson move is laughable. Not only is he terrible, but he's out of shape and uncommitted to working hard. It's ridiculous that a supposed playoff caliber team picked him up for their rotation. I tend to think the Yankees won't make the playoffs, and I wouldn't be at all shocked to see the Blue Jays finish second.

The reds deal was a steal for Washington. There's a good chance that the three guys they got were the three best players in the trade. I have no idea what the Reds could have been thinking with this move.



Yes, you are a troll.
Gugs
Bierwurst








Since: 9.7.02
From: Sleep (That's where I'm a viking)

Since last post: 3961 days
Last activity: 3090 days
#9 Posted on | Instant Rating: 4.94
    Originally posted by BigSteve
    I have no idea what the Reds could have been thinking with this move.


They were thinking that their bullpen desperately needed help, and that their offense was good enough to lose a part or two in order to get it. Or maybe they thought they still had Wily Mo Pena to plug into the outfield.



jfkfc
Liverwurst








Since: 9.2.02

Since last post: 2886 days
Last activity: 2695 days
#10 Posted on | Instant Rating: 5.98
    Originally posted by It's False
    I know the Yankees have it bad with Pavano on the shelf and Johnson past his prime, but do they really think Ponson is the answer? I would have taken my chances on bringing up one of the prospects, especially in light of Jonathan Palpelbon's success in Boston.
What exactly does Sidney Ponson have to be the answer for? Is anyone, Yankees management included, lifting this guy up as the #1 starter? Seriously, they brought him in to be the fifth starter, someone who is, right now anyway, not expected to get a single start in the postseason (if they make it). Does Ponson have the ability to be a better option than running Shawn Chacon or Kris Wilson out for another start, or taking Ron Villone out of the pen and putting him into the rotation? At this point, I think he could be. I don't see them making a play for a front-line pitcher. If the Phillies throw in the towel, perhaps they make a play for Abreau. Bringing in a grade-A outfielder may create issues if both Sheffield and Matsui come back healthy (who cares), but as long as they don't have to give up Hughes, or someone else of high value, I could see it.

Too bad that the Yanks couldn't have sent Chacon to Cincinatti for Kearns....that might have been nice.



I think, therefore, I think I am, at least I think...
skorpio17
Morcilla








Since: 11.7.02
From: New Jersey

Since last post: 5853 days
Last activity: 5853 days
#11 Posted on | Instant Rating: 2.46
The Reds made a pretty bad deal for themselves. They overpaid for some decent middle-relievers. Clayton, Harris, and Wagner are the throwins. It is not a deal for them to win this year. Their only hope is that in the long run, Bray is another H. Street. Only in the long run R. Wagner could be better than Bray or Majewski. I’d also rather have Rauch, if I'm forced to take a MR from the Nats. They should’ve been able to get the same deal without adding in Kearns. Just think of all the players they rejected in the last 2 years they could’ve traded Kearns for. He still has a lot of value.

I liked the idea of trading F. Lopez because I think he is overvalued. But the deal should’ve been much better. If you wanted 2 solid middle-relievers you could’ve went to the Cubs with Eyre, Howry, N. Perez for F. Lopez + R. Wagner. Or if you wanted to get rid F. Lopez, Kearns, + R. Wagner send them to Pit. for J. Wilson, R. Hernandez, Vogelsong, + (S. Torres or Marte).

The Nats are now better prepared to trade Soriano, Guillen, or even flip Kearns for prospects.
MisterHenderson
Boerewors








Since: 3.5.06
From: New York

Since last post: 5274 days
Last activity: 5193 days
#12 Posted on | Instant Rating: 0.87
If you're Shawn Chicon, how depressed are you that the Yankees think an alcoholic (don't make you a bad person)is better than you.



37? These are 34s...and they're loose. I gotta live with 37?
Thread rated: 5.24
Pages: 1
Thread ahead: July 19 - Gwynn's first hit
Next thread: Prior goes on DL...again
Previous thread: New tv deals
(672 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
Considering Johnson was one of the few pitchers who consistently shut down the Red Sox, from a head to head point of view the O's are weaker now than they were when the season ended.
Related threads: This one belongs to the Reds - A classy story about the Reds - any help from Cincy? - More...
The W - Baseball - Mr. Kearns go to Washington, Ponson to YanksRegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board

ZimBoard
©2001-2024 Brothers Zim

This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.183 seconds.