The W
June 7, 2009 - birthdaybritney.jpg
Views: 179006872
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Calendar | Color chart | Log in for more!
28.3.24 0923
The W - Baseball - The Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim
This thread has 17 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
Thread rated: 5.21
Pages: 1 2 Next
(878 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (22 total)
The Goon
Banger
Moderator








Since: 2.1.02
From: Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Since last post: 862 days
Last activity: 840 days
#1 Posted on | Instant Rating: 8.08
The Los Angeles/California/Anaheim Angels have changed their name again.

Say it three times fast.
Promote this thread!
pieman
As young as
he feels








Since: 11.12.01
From: China, Maine

Since last post: 121 days
Last activity: 7 days
ICQ:  
#2 Posted on | Instant Rating: 8.74

Well, that's just idiotic. The Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim? What's next? The University of Southern California College?

This will still get shortened to The LA Angels, methinks.




Gabba gabba hey!
JayJayDean
Scrapple








Since: 2.1.02
From: Seattle, WA

Since last post: 2985 days
Last activity: 2562 days
#3 Posted on | Instant Rating: 7.89
The article stated that dropping "Anaheim" would be a violation of the lease, so THIS is their workaround solution?! Somewhere Al Davis is running "The Los Angeles Raiders of Oakland" around in his head.



“To get ass, you’ve got to bring ass." -- Roy Jones Jr.

"Your input has been noted.
I hope you don't take it personally if I disregard it."
-- Guru Zim

"Speak English or face admin retribution." -- CRZ
geemoney
Scrapple








Since: 26.1.03
From: Naples, FL

Since last post: 12 days
Last activity: 5 min.
#4 Posted on | Instant Rating: 4.72
Mighty Ducks of Anaheim (isn't that TECHNICALLY their name?), Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim.....what is WITH that city?



College, Sports and More!: Experience It
Pool-Boy
Lap cheong








Since: 1.8.02
From: Huntington Beach, CA

Since last post: 206 days
Last activity: 163 days
#5 Posted on | Instant Rating: 1.00
I know that a lot of us here took a great deal of pride in the fact that the Angels were the Orange County team, and NOT another LA team.

I honestly believe this move may have single handedly pissed of the entire fan base that they have built up since the world series win. NO ONE I know of likes this out here, and everyone is of the "screw the Angels" mindset.

Even if the name change ends up sticking, it is going to backfire big time. LA fans aren't going to trade the Dodgers for the Angels, and Orange County Angels fans are not going to take any pride in another LA team...



Still on the Shelf.com

Updated Weekly
BigDaddyLoco
Scrapple








Since: 2.1.02

Since last post: 327 days
Last activity: 327 days
#6 Posted on | Instant Rating: 5.15
Wouldn't it have been easier to stay the California Angels?

Pool-Boy
Lap cheong








Since: 1.8.02
From: Huntington Beach, CA

Since last post: 206 days
Last activity: 163 days
#7 Posted on | Instant Rating: 1.00
Well, if they didn't change their name to Anaheim in the first place, they wouldn't have gotten the stadium renovation they wanted. And would have probably have left as a result.




Still on the Shelf.com

Updated Weekly
StingArmy
Andouille








Since: 3.5.03
From: Georgia bred, you can tell by my Hawk jersey

Since last post: 2957 days
Last activity: 549 days
#8 Posted on | Instant Rating: 6.16
Oh man, this looks like something straight out of The Onion. Maybe it'll catch on eventually. People used to regularly say the New York Football Giants (because of the baseball Giants, right?), and that doesn't sound so bad, maybe this will be the same.

What about "Los Angeles Anaheim?" It's been awhile since high school Spanish, but wouldn't that translate into "The Anaheim Angels?"

- StingArmy
Mayhem
Scrapple








Since: 25.4.03
From: Nashville, TN

Since last post: 2439 days
Last activity: 251 days
#9 Posted on | Instant Rating: 4.75

I'll have to say that might be the dumbest thing I've heard all year (only 3 days into it, of course).
Big Bad
Scrapple








Since: 4.1.02
From: Dorchester, Ontario

Since last post: 1927 days
Last activity: 1496 days
#10 Posted on | Instant Rating: 4.37
If Arte Moreno was smart, he could've tapped into two pop culture veins at once and renamed his team the O.C. Angels.



I'm interested in selling my youngest daughter into slavery as sanctioned in Exodus 21:7. She's a Georgetown sophomore, speaks fluent Italian, always cleared the table when it was her turn. What would a good price for her be? While thinking about that, can I ask another? My Chief of Staff Leo McGarry insists on working on the Sabbath. Exodus 35:2 clearly says he should be put to death. Am I morally obligated to kill him myself or is it okay to call the police? Here's one that's really important because we've got a lot of sports fans in this town: touching the skin of a dead pig makes one unclean. Leviticus 11:7. If they promise to wear gloves, can the Washington Redskins still play football? Can Notre Dame? Can West Point? Does the whole town really have to be together to stone my brother John for planting different crops side by side? Can I burn my mother in a small family gathering for wearing garments made from two different threads? Think about those questions, would you? One last thing: while you may be mistaking this for your monthly meeting of the Ignorant Tight-Ass Club, in this building, when the President stands, nobody sits." --- President Jed Bartlett, The West Wing
pieman
As young as
he feels








Since: 11.12.01
From: China, Maine

Since last post: 121 days
Last activity: 7 days
ICQ:  
#11 Posted on | Instant Rating: 8.74

    Originally posted by StingArmy
    Maybe it'll catch on eventually. People used to regularly say the New York Football Giants (because of the baseball Giants, right?), and that doesn't sound so bad.


What do you mean used to? Here in New England, we still call the the team the New York Football Giants. It just rolls of the tongue.




Gabba gabba hey!
The Thrill
Banger








Since: 16.4.02
From: Green Bay, WI

Since last post: 3633 days
Last activity: 232 days
#12 Posted on | Instant Rating: 4.25
Catch The Thrill on "Pick of the Week": taped Tuesdays at Planet Magic in Denmark, WI; on the air Sundays @ 1 am on WB-14!

What the hell is gonna be on the hat, some kind of "LAAA" thing!?

Ye gods, this be 6 kinds of stupid.



Star wipe, and...we're out.
Thrillin' ain't easy.



THE THRILL
ACW-NWA Wisconsin
Home Video Technical Director...&
A2NWO 4 Life!
(Click the big G to hear the Packers Fight Song in RealAudio...or try .MP3, .AU, or .WAV!)
Big Bad
Scrapple








Since: 4.1.02
From: Dorchester, Ontario

Since last post: 1927 days
Last activity: 1496 days
#13 Posted on | Instant Rating: 4.44
Funny quote from Dave Hodge on TSN this past weekend....."You've got the Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim and their regional rivals the Brooklyn Dodgers of Los Angeles."



I'm interested in selling my youngest daughter into slavery as sanctioned in Exodus 21:7. She's a Georgetown sophomore, speaks fluent Italian, always cleared the table when it was her turn. What would a good price for her be? While thinking about that, can I ask another? My Chief of Staff Leo McGarry insists on working on the Sabbath. Exodus 35:2 clearly says he should be put to death. Am I morally obligated to kill him myself or is it okay to call the police? Here's one that's really important because we've got a lot of sports fans in this town: touching the skin of a dead pig makes one unclean. Leviticus 11:7. If they promise to wear gloves, can the Washington Redskins still play football? Can Notre Dame? Can West Point? Does the whole town really have to be together to stone my brother John for planting different crops side by side? Can I burn my mother in a small family gathering for wearing garments made from two different threads? Think about those questions, would you? One last thing: while you may be mistaking this for your monthly meeting of the Ignorant Tight-Ass Club, in this building, when the President stands, nobody sits." --- President Jed Bartlett, The West Wing
avonhun
Cotechino








Since: 21.4.04

Since last post: 6741 days
Last activity: 6704 days
#14 Posted on | Instant Rating: 1.13
if you think this is a stupid idea, you must not care what is best for the team. it is about money, if you have been going to angels games since moreno took over the beer prices are low and the ticket prices are low. he has invested in big time free agents and gotten the team to the playoffs again which is no small feat in baseball. all this is good. who cares if he changes the name so that he can negotiate a better television/radio deal. frankly, i am an angels fan that lives in los angeles. i have been since the california angel days, at least now i can smile everyday when i drive home and see "city of angels" billboards near my home.
It's False
Scrapple








Since: 20.6.02
From: I am the Tag Team Champions!

Since last post: 2199 days
Last activity: 581 days
#15 Posted on | Instant Rating: 4.93
The end-all, be-all isn't always about money. It's about the consumer who, in the end, provides the money. This name change hasn't won any new fans in Los Angeles (most of whom are die-hard Dodgers fans or others who are already Angels fans who can't change their minds anyway) and it's actually alienated fans in Orange County who feel betrayed.

The Angels don't need a better television or radio deal. They're already broadcast throughout Los Angeles and Orange County on KCAL 9 and on radio through our ESPN Radio affiliates. Fox and ESPN will broadcast their games because they're a good, competitive team, not because of where they're from. The name change was ultimately unnecessary and will hurt the team and its Orange County fan base in the long run.




Bow before the awesome might of DAVE~!
avonhun
Cotechino








Since: 21.4.04

Since last post: 6741 days
Last activity: 6704 days
#16 Posted on | Instant Rating: 0.87
sorry dude, you are mistaken. they will get paid more money for each game on tv now that they are from "los angeles". thats just how the business works. it might not make a difference to viewers like us who see the games on tv regardless but when they negotiate a new deal soon they will ask for more money and get it.
Whitebacon
Banger








Since: 12.1.02
From: Fresno, CA

Since last post: 119 days
Last activity: 8 days
ICQ:  
#17 Posted on | Instant Rating: 7.04
    Originally posted by avonhun
    sorry dude, you are mistaken. they will get paid more money for each game on tv now that they are from "los angeles". thats just how the business works. it might not make a difference to viewers like us who see the games on tv regardless but when they negotiate a new deal soon they will ask for more money and get it.


Links, please.



PeterStork
Sujuk








Since: 25.1.02
From: Chicagoland with Hoosiers, or "The Region"

Since last post: 3290 days
Last activity: 3053 days
#18 Posted on | Instant Rating: 7.62
    Originally posted by avonhun
    sorry dude, you are mistaken. they will get paid more money for each game on tv now that they are from "los angeles". thats just how the business works. it might not make a difference to viewers like us who see the games on tv regardless but when they negotiate a new deal soon they will ask for more money and get it.


You take the abstract far too literally.

It's true that marketing themselves as "Los Angeles" may help the team reach more fans around SoCal, resulting in more tix sold, higher ratings, etc, but it is hardly a guarantee that it will lead to more revenue.

You know what does lead to money? Division titles and free agent signings like Vlad Guerrero and Orlando Cabrera. As a Cardinals fan, I'd pay money to see the team if they called themselves the Kirkwood Fannybusters, granted that PUJOLS~! is still patroling first base and the NL Central title is a possibility. No one who has bled Dodger Blue will now say, "hey, those Angels are my team now that they're Los Angeles of Anaheim!" They might check out a game if Tracy's boys are watching Fox while Scioscia's are in the ALCS.

The name change is cute, but pointless.



exit 670 dot com

Hierarchy of Deities: Sarah Vowell > Roger Ebert > Albert Pujols > God

So, um, I don't want you to believe everything you hear at the parent-teacher conference, okay, 'cause...they lie. And they exaggerate. That's why they're teachers, right? Those who can't, right, Mom? Those who can't.

---Maeby Funke

avonhun
Cotechino








Since: 21.4.04

Since last post: 6741 days
Last activity: 6704 days
#19 Posted on | Instant Rating: 0.88
http://www.thepolypost.com/story.php?story=2160

"Owner George Steinbrenner can afford the payroll of over $240 million a year, largely due to his local television contracts which bring in a reported profit of over $200 million a season.

A television contract that large must certainly have large national advertisers, not just the local Home Depot and Wienerschnitzel, which sponsored the Angels this year. "

sorry i didnt have time to find more and sooner, but having a major media location like los angeles in your name will appeal to bigger advertisers. i thought the money came from the actual deal itself but i guess that deal is generated based on the advertising interest. so it is true that its not a direct correlation, but its also common sense that they will get better advertisers and more money. its not the fans they are trying to appeal to, its the advertisers.
Pool-Boy
Lap cheong








Since: 1.8.02
From: Huntington Beach, CA

Since last post: 206 days
Last activity: 163 days
#20 Posted on | Instant Rating: 1.00
The Yankees get such big deals because they are the YANKEES, not because they are the "New York" Yankees. That is a team with a tradition of being a good team, and wins more often than it looses. It also has a more "national" fan base, whereas the Angels just don't.

Nobody outside LA cares if the Angels become "from LA," and people in LA don't care because they have the Dodgers.

If he wants to get a better TV deal, he needs to build a better team - a team with staying power. One World Series win is not going to do it - no matter what city the team is "from."



Still on the Shelf.com

Updated Weekly
Pages: 1 2 Next
Thread rated: 5.21
Pages: 1 2 Next
Thread ahead: Piazza Marries Woman
Next thread: Marlins "DEL-GOT" him
Previous thread: Carlos Beltran agrees to terms with the Mets
(878 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
Let's not forget your 1924 World Series Champion Washington Senators.
- Big Bad, Nationals: One and done? (2004)
Related threads: Mondesi is not playing ball again - Mondesi's playing ball again - Vlad Guerrero to the Mets? - More...
The W - Baseball - The Los Angeles Angels of AnaheimRegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board

ZimBoard
©2001-2024 Brothers Zim

This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.166 seconds.