leave it the way it is and have 1 run in every once in a while on the other show.. I think it would get old quick (like evolution) if they where on the same show.. IMO
Originally posted by svt4realleave it the way it is and have 1 run in every once in a while on the other show.. I think it would get old quick (like evolution) if they where on the same show.. IMO
then in a few months have them tag up again!!!!!!
The sad thing is that this will probably come true.
This post has been paid for by the friends and supporters of The Bad Guy
I'd say they should only be on the same show if Kane was going to win a rematch- but fat chance of that. Still, I'm not going to be sick of the deadman for a while yet.
I Really think that the Undertaker has to hang it up, or atleast let others shine. Him coming back as the Deadman was cool, but it wasnt worth all of the hype they made it out to be. He still looks the same as the Bad Ass. Its true that some of the older guys dont know how to Hang it up (Hogan,HBK,Flair,taker,Nash,VINCE!) all but Nash and HBK are over 50, with nash almost 50 and hbk almost 40. Some guys need to learn how to retire. You dont see Snuka jumping into a main event?
(edited by JrBernal83 on 25.3.04 1837) "You Suck, Its True, Its True
Otherwise, I agree, some of those guys need to retire. I don't think HBK really needs to. He's been showing that he can still hang with the guys and even carry some of the lesser guys to decent matches. He may not be what he was eight years ago, but he's still one of the most talented guys on the roster.
Taker is still a very, very agile and believable wrestler. He's got years left in him, if he wants them, as far as I'm concerned - esp. if he's gonna work a lighter schedule like he has been lately. (No UT on smackdown tonight? Nor last week . . . )
Nash did hang em up - he's done, as far as I know.
Flair can still hang - he's not as great as he used to be, but still worth having around for an occasional match.
HBK is almost every bit as good as he used to be. His body ain't quite the same - but it's close. His inring performances are still STELLAR. HBK, even now, is one of the greatest on the entire WWE roster. I hope Shawn sticks around for a few more years. HBK matches have always been just a little more special than your average "great match."
Leave Undertaker on Smackdown. He can feud with guys like Bradshaw & Bob Holly. No-one would give a ratsass if they had to job to him. Well me not anyhoo. There is also ways for him to feud with others in time like Cena or Eddie again. Or feud with Shane McMahon and see if he ruins Undertaker like he did Kane on RAW with that feud he had. He could also fued with Big Show but on RAW he'd only have HHH or A-Train or Batista and all three have big downsizes. Kane needs to be kept from Undertaker otherwise it gets real boring faster.
Great post Hoodle, why should HBK have to retire? He still outworks more than 80% of the WWE roster and like 90% of the Raw roster. More workrate is a good thing, besides, is nearing-40 really all that old? Benoit, Booker T and Eddie are only about two years younger than him, should they think about hanging it up? Bret Hart (who is retired) went past 40 and he was really doing fine until that head injury. Nash is pretty much retired, but 44 is as 'almost 50' as 14 is almost 20. Flair still outworks more than half the roster, which is more a sad commentary about the roster than anything but he's still doing fine aside from his lame-ass Evolution's bitch boy character. Should Rico(age 42) retire too? He only started a few years ago. Snuka no longer wrestles because he CAN'T.
Basically, if you can still go that why retire? This age prejudice is useless, as the young guys can learn a lot from the older guys and I'd take HBK, Flair and Undertaker over Randy Orton, Rene Dupree and Garrison Cade any day. And I mean, going over them in matches too, until those tools actually do something worthwhile.
Edit: Booker T is actually the same age as Michaels.
With wrestling personalities popping up on this TV show many times a year for special one-on-one interviews with host Michael Landsberg, and with wrestlers responding to things other wrestlers before them have said about them, it seems logical to keep it ...