messenoir
Summer sausage
   
   


        
      
    
Since: 20.2.02 From: Columbia, MO
Since last post: 26 days Last activity: 1 day
| AIM: | |
| | |
| #1 Posted on 8.11.04 2343.45 | Instant Rating: 4.66 | This is copied and pasted from the OO Forums. I haven't verified them, so not sure how accurate the numbers are. But, if the numbers are true, the voting results are really screwed up. This is a county Kerry won, btw.
http://boe.cuyahogacounty.us/BOE/results/currentresults1.htm
Voting legerdemain ahoy! Keep in mind that provisional and overseas ballots are not yet counted, so these "ballots cast" totals are, if anything, low:
Bay Village: 13,710 registered voters; 18,663 ballots cast Beachwood: 9,943 registered voters; 13,939 ballots cast Bedford: 9,942 registered voters; 14,465 ballots cast Bedford Heights: 8,142 registered voters; 13,512 ballots cast Brooklyn: 8,016 registered voters; 12,303 ballots cast Brooklyn Heights: 1,144 registered voters; 1,869 ballots cast Chagrin Falls (VIL): 3,557 registered voters; 4,860 ballots cast Cuyahoga Heights: 570 registered voters; 1,382 ballots cast Fairview Park: 13,342 registered voters; 18,472 ballots cast Highland Hills: 760 registered voters; 8,822 ballots cast (Over ELEVEN TIMES more votes than voters! You get the cookie!) Independence: 5,735 registered voters; 6,226 ballots cast Mayfield (VIL): 2,764 registered voters; 3,145 ballots cast Middleburg Heights: 12,173 registered voters; 14,854 ballots cast North Olmsted: 25,794 registered voters; 25,887 ballots cast Oakwood (VIL): 2,746 registered voters; 7,099 ballots cast Olmsted Falls: 6,538 registered voters; 7,328 ballots cast Pepper Pike: 5,131 registered voters; 6,479 ballots cast Rocky River: 16,600 registered voters; 20,070 ballots cast Solon (Ward 6): 2,292 registered voters; 4,300 ballots cast South Euclid: 16,902 registered voters; 16,917 ballots cast Strongsville (Ward 3): 7,806 registered voters; 12,108 ballots cast University Heights: 10,072 registered voters; 11,982 ballots cast Warrensville Heights: 10,562 registered voters; 15,039 ballots cast Woodmere (VIL): 558 registered voters; 8,854 ballots cast (Oh no, wait! SIXTEEN TIMES! You get a cookie, too!)
| Promote this thread! | | CRZ
Big Brother Administrator
   
   


          
         
       
Since: 9.12.01 From: ミネアポリス
Since last post: 7 hours Last activity: 1 hour
| #2 Posted on 9.11.04 0024.16 | Instant Rating: 9.02 | Well, the page that goes with that link says ...the ballots cast totals for municipalities on this web page and on the summary report needs to be derived by using the following technique: ... For municipalities without wards, please refer to the contest of interest on the canvass report. so I'll do that with your cookie places.
Issue #42, the Highland Hills Village charter amendment, shows 289 yes or no votes recorded in their tally.
Woodmere (VIL): 558 registered voters; 8,854 ballots cast (Oh no, wait! SIXTEEN TIMES! You get a cookie, too!)
Issue #110, the Woodmere Village proposed ordinance, shows 287 yes or no votes recorded in their tally.
(shrug)
| messenoir
Summer sausage
   
   


        
      
    
Since: 20.2.02 From: Columbia, MO
Since last post: 26 days Last activity: 1 day
| AIM: | |
| | |
| #3 Posted on 9.11.04 0032.59 | Instant Rating: 4.66 | | I didn't write the cookie thing, but point taken. Like I said, I didn't verify the statistics, and they could be all wrong. | Crimedog
Boerewors
   
   

        
      
     
Since: 28.3.02 From: Ohio
Since last post: 2191 days Last activity: 2181 days
| #4 Posted on 11.11.04 2245.12 | Instant Rating: 4.20 | | What happened was the turnout numbers were wrong. The vote totals were right. Trust me. We've crunched this lord knows how many times at the office and come up with correct vote totals each time. | whatever
Lap cheong
   
   


         
       
      
Since: 12.2.02 From: Cleveland, Ohio
Since last post: 2 days Last activity: 14 hours
| #5 Posted on 12.11.04 0640.15 | Instant Rating: 3.35 | Good to see Garfield Heights isn't on the list, although it almost looks like the *only* Cuyahoga county community not mentioned. WHOOO-HOOO - go Garfield! No voter fraud here at all! We can run a clean vote! YAY!
Oh wait, the school levy went down in flaming defeat. BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO.
Hey, #500 post as well! HOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO...
"Lita holds a Stone Cold Steve Austin home pregnancy test. What will the Bottom Line say? Hell Yeah or Eh-EH?" - Raw Satire, 6/15/04"Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we." - George W. Bush
|
| PalpatineW
Lap cheong
   
   


         
       
      
Since: 2.1.02 From: Getting Rowdy
Since last post: 2311 days Last activity: 2153 days
| AIM: | |
| | |
| #6 Posted on 12.11.04 0741.02 | Instant Rating: 9.00 | Don't have a web link for this yet, but John Fund said on FOX News last night that the error resulted in the voting machine or software attributing all the absentee ballots to Cuyahoga county.
Edit: And here, from the Cleveland Plain Dealer:
http://www.cleveland.com/news/plaindealer/index.ssf?/base/cuyahoga/1100082911218052.xml
The problem stems from an election canvassing report posted on the county's Web site, where the number of "ballots cast" in several suburbs exceeds the number of registered voters.
For example, the documents suggest that 13,939 ballots were cast in Beachwood, though only 9,943 voters are registered there.
But county officials say that's not how the data should be read. The "ballots cast" is not a reflection of the votes within a city's borders; the numbers also include votes in the congressional and legislative districts that overlap with the cities.
I'll admit that explanation confuses me. Does that mean that the ballot totals of City X were added to the totals of every other town in the same congressional district?
Either way, the Plain Dealer says it's nothing to worry about.
(edited by PalpatineW on 12.11.04 0843)
"You know what I'm happiest for? I'm happiest for Bill Buckner, Calvin Schiraldi, Bob Stanley, Johnny Pesky, Ted Williams, all of the Red Sox that played before us will now be remembered for the great players and great people they were instead of all the other crap." Curt Schilling |
| | | | | | |