The W
Views: 97589785
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Calendar | Color chart | Log in for more!
23.7.14 0023
The W - Current Events & Politics - October NH Poll Register and log in to post!
Thread rated: 4.51
Pages: 1
(1720 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (5 total)
Grimis
Scrapple








Since: 11.7.02
From: MD

Since last post: 1177 days
Last activity: 974 days
#1 Posted on | Instant Rating: 7.29
New poll says that the more things change, the more they stay the same:

Candidate: October Sept, Aug, July
Howard Dean: 29% 31% 28% 19%
John Kerry: 19% 21% 21% 25%
Joe Lieberman: 6% 5% 4% 6%
Dick Gephardt: 6% 8% 10% 10%
Wesley Clark: 5% 2% 1% 2%
John Edwards: 3% 2% 2% 2%
Bob Graham: 1% 2% 2% 2%
Dennis Kucinich: 1% 1% 0% 1%
Carol Moseley Braun: 1% 1% 0% 1%
Al Sharpton: 0% 0% 0% 1%
Undecided: 29% 27% 32% 30%

Undecided has pulled into a tie with Dean(again). The closer this gets to the end of the year with nobody pulling ahead makes it more interesting, but it's definately bad news for the Dems.




2003 WORLD SERIES(like I said it would be all along)



Please Believe It!
Promote this thread!
godking
Chourico








Since: 20.10.02
From: Toronto

Since last post: 3813 days
Last activity: 3758 days
#2 Posted on | Instant Rating: 3.24
The closer this gets to the end of the year with nobody pulling ahead

Uh, Dean is ten points ahead of John Kerry and Kerry is thirtee points ahead of everybody else. How is that not "pulling ahead" in NH, assuming that the undecided vote spreads even slightly evenly?

In any case, the numbers are pretty much irrelevant. Remember in 1992 Bill Clinton only got six percent of the primary vote in Iowa (Tom Harkin came in first) and then only came in second in New Hampshire and South Carolina (behind Paul Tsongas) and didn't start dominating the primaries till halfway through the season.

Republicans tend to choose their candidate early on (W, Bob Dole, Reagan) and rally behind him early. Democrats tend to throw an entire bunch of people into the fray and see who emerges (Bill Clinton, Jimmy Carter, even John F. Kennedy). It's just a difference in how the parties do things, and saying that the Democrats are inefficient for not following the Republican model doesn't really compute.
Grimis
Scrapple








Since: 11.7.02
From: MD

Since last post: 1177 days
Last activity: 974 days
#3 Posted on | Instant Rating: 7.29
    Originally posted by godking
    The closer this gets to the end of the year with nobody pulling ahead

    Uh, Dean is ten points ahead of John Kerry and Kerry is thirtee points ahead of everybody else. How is that not "pulling ahead" in NH, assuming that the undecided vote spreads even slightly evenly?

Sorry, was referring to the national picture, not NH specifically...



2003 WORLD SERIES(like I said it would be all along)



Please Believe It!
godking
Chourico








Since: 20.10.02
From: Toronto

Since last post: 3813 days
Last activity: 3758 days
#4 Posted on | Instant Rating: 3.24
Sorry, was referring to the national picture, not NH specifically...

My point still stands, then.

And again - Bill Clinton didn't emerge until midway through the primary season, neither did Carter, neither did Kennedy. The last two Democrats to win the primaries decisively from the beginning were Gore and Dukakis. Which doesn't mean anything either - I mean, one of the Dem candidates could walk away with everything and then beat Bush, who knows - but again, this is how the Democrats operate, they don't anoint the candidate before the primary season starts.
Grimis
Scrapple








Since: 11.7.02
From: MD

Since last post: 1177 days
Last activity: 974 days
#5 Posted on | Instant Rating: 7.29
And I agree with that. The Democrats ability to stick with the frontrunner has always been suspect. Hell, this goes back to EMK challenging Carter in '80...



2003 WORLD SERIES(like I said it would be all along)



Please Believe It!
Thread rated: 4.51
Pages: 1
Thread ahead: What now for California?
Next thread: Recall by the Numbers
Previous thread: AP: Clinton WHite House funneled money to Hamas
(1720 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
And for nearly rolling over to the Nazis, yes. I understand that millions of Russians (or well, I guess they were all Soviets back then)
- Enojado Viento, 50 Years Without Stalin (2003)
The W - Current Events & Politics - October NH PollRegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board

ZimBoard
©2001-2014 Brothers Zim

This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.108 seconds.