|User||Post (3 total)|
From: Northern NJ
Since last post: 1 day
Last activity: 1 hour
|#1 Posted on | Instant Rating: 7.22|
|Haven't read it. Won't read it. But for those of you who must - Click Here (nytimes.com)|
registration may be required
I'm Blind Jimmy Winthrop, Blues singer for the Rich.
|Promote this thread!|| |
As young as
From: China, Maine
Since last post: 6 days
Last activity: 1 day
|#2 Posted on | Instant Rating: 7.30|
Registration was not required. Maybe I was already registered. I dunno.
Having not read any of the books, only having seen the movies, I read the review.
There are no spoilers. The author talks about all the books in total without revealing any plot points in this book. I am guessing that's the only way the Times would print this "review."
Nothing to see here for Harry Fans.
CRZ had to edit my profile and close my table for me. I am a bad man.
From: Austin, TX
Since last post: 76 days
Last activity: 20 hours
|AIM: || ||#3 Posted on | Instant Rating: 3.08|
|Having read the book, I would say it does sorta give away a bit about the ending so I would advise people to stay away until they've read it.
If you haven't read George R.R. Martin's "A Song of Ice and Fire" (A Game of Thrones, A Clash of Kings, A Storm of Swords), you really should (and that goes for everyone).
|The W - Print - NY Times prints Harry Potter book review early||Register and log in to post!|
The W message board
©2001-2014 Brothers Zim
This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.052 seconds.