|User||Post (3 total)|
Back to Back Survivor
From: Northern NJ
Since last post: 2 days
Last activity: 9 hours
|#1 Posted on | Instant Rating: 7.22|
|Haven't read it. Won't read it. But for those of you who must - Click Here (nytimes.com)|
registration may be required
I'm Blind Jimmy Winthrop, Blues singer for the Rich.
|Promote this thread!|| |
As young as
From: China, Maine
Since last post: 1 day
Last activity: 1 day
|#2 Posted on | Instant Rating: 7.30|
Registration was not required. Maybe I was already registered. I dunno.
Having not read any of the books, only having seen the movies, I read the review.
There are no spoilers. The author talks about all the books in total without revealing any plot points in this book. I am guessing that's the only way the Times would print this "review."
Nothing to see here for Harry Fans.
CRZ had to edit my profile and close my table for me. I am a bad man.
From: Austin, TX
Since last post: 441 days
Last activity: 16 days
|AIM: || ||#3 Posted on | Instant Rating: 3.08|
|Having read the book, I would say it does sorta give away a bit about the ending so I would advise people to stay away until they've read it.
The Washington Post says it is so. (washingtonpost.com) And later in the article... If this is the case, I'd like to say that it Fucking Sucks, but it's not like Boondocks itself is gone.
|The W - Print - NY Times prints Harry Potter book review early||Register and log in to post!|
The W message board
©2001-2016 Brothers Zim
This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.09 seconds.