User Post (3 total)
dunkndollaz Banger Back to Back Survivor Since: 3.1.02 From: Northern NJ Since last post: 2 days Last activity: 7 hours # 1 Posted on 19.7.07 0706.43 | Instant Rating: 7.22 Haven't read it. Won't read it. But for those of you who must - Click Here (nytimes.com) registration may be required I'm Blind Jimmy Winthrop, Blues singer for the Rich. Promote this thread!
pieman As young as he feels Since: 11.12.01 From: China, Maine Since last post: 16 days Last activity: 23 hours
ICQ: # 2 Posted on 19.7.07 1009.06 | Instant Rating: 7.30
Registration was not required. Maybe I was already registered. I dunno. Having not read any of the books, only having seen the movies, I read the review. There are no spoilers. The author talks about all the books in total without revealing any plot points in this book. I am guessing that's the only way the Times would print this "review." Nothing to see here for Harry Fans. CRZ had to edit my profile and close my table for me. I am a bad man.
wmatistic Andouille Since: 2.2.04 From: Austin, TX Since last post: 92 days Last activity: 3 hours
AIM: # 3 Posted on 19.7.07 1049.14 | Instant Rating: 3.08
Having read the book, I would say it does sorta give away a bit about the ending so I would advise people to stay away until they've read it.
Truth. John Layman and Jason Fabok have really turned Detective around from the drudge Tony Daniel was putting out. Over a week late, but Hawkeye #10... wow. Hawkguy is the best comic book out there, man.
The W - Print - NY Times prints Harry Potter book review early Register and log in to post!
The W message board ZimBoard ©2001-2017 Brothers Zim
This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.108 seconds.