The W
Views: 97799352
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Calendar | Color chart | Log in for more!
30.7.14 0008
The W - Current Events & Politics - NPR Seeks Rehearing on Webcast Royaties
This thread has 2 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
Thread rated: 5.56
Pages: 1
(475 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
Post (3 total)

Since: 7.2.02
From: Huntington, NY

Since last post: 6 days
Last activity: 8 min.
#1 Posted on | Instant Rating: 5.85
NPR fights back, seeks rehearing on Internet radio royalty increases (Ars Technica)

    "The new rates inexplicably break with the longstanding tradition of recognizing public radio's non-commercial, non-profit role, while the procedures we're being asked to now undertake for measurement are non-existent, arbitrary and costly," said NPR's vice president for communications, Andi Sporkin, in a statement. "In its decision, the Board has attempted to equate public radio with commercial radio, which we are not. Instead, public radio is driven by a public service mission on behalf of underserved and unserved audiences; in our internet music efforts, those audiences include both listeners and the music community that seeks public radio to reach those listeners. We hope the Board will reconsider."

Pretty much sums up my feelings on the matter.

"Oh my God! They have a shit-load of Cockapoo stuff!"
-Jennifer's greatest quote... ever.
Promote this thread!

Since: 7.11.02
From: Dallas, TX

Since last post: 21 days
Last activity: 4 hours
#2 Posted on | Instant Rating: 7.73
I agree as well. Amid a bunch of things that bother me about the webcast royalties, the thing that absolutely bothers me the most is that the fees can be retroactively charged back to 2006. That is absolute garbage. And, the mechanism by which they are determining the fees seems ill defined. The ruling itself is ridiculous enough on its own. The retroactive fees are just piling on the idiocy.

"Teach children that they have great potential because they are human." -Warrior
Eddie Famous

Since: 11.12.01
From: Catlin IL

Since last post: 248 days
Last activity: 242 days
#3 Posted on | Instant Rating: 5.90

If we have to pay for it, they have to as well.

As of 2/28/05: 101 pounds since December 7, 2004
OFFICIAL THREE-MONTH COUNT: 112 pounds on March 9, 2005
OFFICIAL SIX-MONTH COUNT: 142 pounds on June 8, 2005
OFFICIAL ONE YEAR COUNT: 187 pounds on December 7, 2005
As of 2/27/06: 202 pounds "I've lost a heavyweight"
As of 7/31/06: 224 pounds
Thread rated: 5.56
Pages: 1
Thread ahead: Smokers Are Dead Weight at the Office
Next thread: Quebec Provincial Elections
Previous thread: Because I'm The Taxman
(475 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
It would be far better for the Democrats to have a guy as majority leader who's a) a political liability and b) not the President's handpicked guy You can thank Jr. for this "railroading." He saw an opportunity to get his guy (Bill Frist)
- MoeGates, Lott takes one for the team (2002)
The W - Current Events & Politics - NPR Seeks Rehearing on Webcast RoyatiesRegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board

©2001-2014 Brothers Zim

This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.092 seconds.