The W
Views: 99108409
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Calendar | Color chart | Log in for more!
21.9.14 1715
The W - Baseball - No-no by Lester
This thread has 5 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
Thread rated: 4.43
Pages: 1
(403 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (14 total)
Sec19Row53
Lap cheong








Since: 2.1.02
From: Oconomowoc, WI

Since last post: 6 days
Last activity: 2 hours
Y!:
#1 Posted on | Instant Rating: 7.79
Just finished on ESPN by way of NESN.

EDIT - Now with linky
http://mlb.mlb.com/news/gameday_recap.jsp?ymd=20080519&content_id=2731480&vkey=recap&fext=.jsp&c_id=bos

(edited by Sec19Row53 on 19.5.08 2053)
Promote this thread!
It's False
Scrapple








Since: 20.6.02
From: I am the Tag Team Champions!

Since last post: 1 day
Last activity: 1 day
#2 Posted on | Instant Rating: 2.13
Congrats to Lester. The fact that he came back from a very serious disease makes this no-hitter the feel-good sports story of the year so far.




You will believe a man can fly
redsoxnation
Scrapple








Since: 24.7.02

Since last post: 447 days
Last activity: 447 days
#3 Posted on | Instant Rating: 5.48
Funny what happens when Lester doesn't suffer from Steve Traschel disease.
4 greatest accomplishments for Lester:
4) Throwing a no-hitter.
3) Winning pitcher in a World Series clinching game.
2) Overcoming cancer.
1) Not being named Mo.
dwaters
Lap cheong








Since: 16.10.02
From: Connecticut

Since last post: 7 days
Last activity: 17 hours
#4 Posted on | Instant Rating: 2.95
    Originally posted by redsoxnation

    1) Not being named Mo.


That one took me a while, but I got it.

I had the game on and left the room, only to find out about the no-hitter after the fact.

Good for Varitek who has caught four of these.

It's funny to think of the Sox pitchers that haven't pitched no-hitters...Clemens, Pedro, Schilling, Beckett.

Are Derek Lowe and Hideo Nomo still pitching???
redsoxnation
Scrapple








Since: 24.7.02

Since last post: 447 days
Last activity: 447 days
#5 Posted on | Instant Rating: 5.48
    Originally posted by dwaters
      Originally posted by redsoxnation

      1) Not being named Mo.


    That one took me a while, but I got it.

    I had the game on and left the room, only to find out about the no-hitter after the fact.

    Good for Varitek who has caught four of these.

    It's funny to think of the Sox pitchers that haven't pitched no-hitters...Clemens, Pedro, Schilling, Beckett.

    Are Derek Lowe and Hideo Nomo still pitching???




Nomo just was released by the Royals, while Lowe was beaten like a drum by the Angels on Sunday when pitching on short rest. Varitek now has sole possession of most no-hitters caught by a catcher at 4.
Sinister Evil
Linguica








Since: 28.6.02
From: Staten Island, NY

Since last post: 2261 days
Last activity: 15 hours
AIM:  
#6 Posted on
Actually, 4 no-hitters ties him with former White Sox catcher Ray Schalk from the 1910s to 1920s. It's more astounding for Varitek's accomplishment because he did it with less complete games being allowed for pitchers and the DH rule.

(edited by Sinister Evil on 20.5.08 0000)
Peter The Hegemon
Lap cheong








Since: 11.2.03
From: Hackettstown, NJ

Since last post: 5 days
Last activity: 1 day
#7 Posted on | Instant Rating: 2.01
One of Schalk's no-hitters was a nine-inning no-hitter which was broken up in the tenth; under the revised rules adopted in 1991, it is no longer an official no-hitter, so officially Varitek has the record.

Under the pre-1991 rules, Tek actually has five, as he caught a rain-shortened no-hitter a couple of years ago. I can certainly see where you could argue that a nine-inning no-no should count regardless of what happens in extra innings, but a shorter one shouldn't. Details at http://sports.aol.com/fanhouse/2008/05/20/clarifying-variteks-place-in-no-no-history/
Sinister Evil
Linguica








Since: 28.6.02
From: Staten Island, NY

Since last post: 2261 days
Last activity: 15 hours
AIM:  
#8 Posted on
I stand (sit?) corrected
Grimis
Scrapple








Since: 11.7.02
From: MD

Since last post: 1237 days
Last activity: 1034 days
#9 Posted on | Instant Rating: 7.29
And if you want to get an unofficial # 5, Varitek also caught Devern Hansack's 5-inning no-hitter against the Orioles on the last day of 2006...
redsoxnation
Scrapple








Since: 24.7.02

Since last post: 447 days
Last activity: 447 days
#10 Posted on | Instant Rating: 5.48
    Originally posted by Grimis
    And if you want to get an unofficial # 5, Varitek also caught Devern Hansack's 5-inning no-hitter against the Orioles on the last day of 2006...



A game that had a 5 hour rain delay and was rain shortened because the Red Sox were absolutely desperate not to lose a 7 figure gate.

djp
Morcilla








Since: 16.2.07
From: 3rd Floor, NW window

Since last post: 98 days
Last activity: 3 hours
#11 Posted on | Instant Rating: 3.73
I just read where Mike Piazza caught two no-nos in his career. Serioulsy? I've always regarded him as a poor defensive catcher ... maybe he was getting signs from the dugout on those two days...
hansen9j
Andouille








Since: 7.11.02
From: Riderville, SK

Since last post: 4 days
Last activity: 22 hours
#12 Posted on | Instant Rating: 7.59
    Originally posted by djpetti
    I just read where Mike Piazza caught two no-nos in his career. Serioulsy? I've always regarded him as a poor defensive catcher ... maybe he was getting signs from the dugout on those two days...


The story I've always heard on Piazza is that while he's weak defensively, he calls a good game.

Edit: Also, there's the fact that a weak defensive catcher should have little or no effect on whether anyone scores a basehit in a game.

(edited by hansen9j on 21.5.08 1429)


It is the policy of the documentary crew to remain true observers and not interfere with its subjects.


GCWOC-Approved
Word Up, Thome
Sinister Evil
Linguica








Since: 28.6.02
From: Staten Island, NY

Since last post: 2261 days
Last activity: 15 hours
AIM:  
#13 Posted on
Mike Piazza wasn't weak defensively, he just had a poor throwing arm. He seemed to play catch with the centerfielder more than the middle infielders when attempting to throw out baserunners.
djp
Morcilla








Since: 16.2.07
From: 3rd Floor, NW window

Since last post: 98 days
Last activity: 3 hours
#14 Posted on | Instant Rating: 3.73
    Originally posted by hansen9j
      Originally posted by djpetti
      I just read where Mike Piazza caught two no-nos in his career. Serioulsy? I've always regarded him as a poor defensive catcher ... maybe he was getting signs from the dugout on those two days...


    The story I've always heard on Piazza is that while he's weak defensively, he calls a good game.

    Edit: Also, there's the fact that a weak defensive catcher should have little or no effect on whether anyone scores a basehit in a game.

    (edited by hansen9j on 21.5.08 1429)


A weak defensive catcher, one who doens't move well and has a poor throwing arm, such as Piazza, is much less likely to effectively handle a bunted ball by a speedy baserunner, thus resulting in a base hit. Also, pitchers pitching to weak defensive catchers are less likely to thowing breaking pitches, such as hard sliders, for fear of wild pitches/passed balls in times when runners are on base. Therefore the pitch selection will be more limited with someone like Piazza behind the plate affecting the likleyhood of a no-hitter.
Thread rated: 4.43
Pages: 1
Thread ahead: The Bruce is Loose!
Next thread: Busch Stadium sets up Peanut Free Zones
Previous thread: what a pitching line
(403 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
I said it when it originally happened. One of this teammates awkwardly pulled him down when he was in midair. That's the asshole that should get the blame for all this.
Related threads: Over-the-shoulder catch, high five a fan, double play at 1st, nothing but net - Buckner honored at Fenway - Tried to make us goto Ja-Pan, we said no no no... - More...
The W - Baseball - No-no by LesterRegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board

ZimBoard
©2001-2014 Brothers Zim

This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.107 seconds.