Originally posted by asteroidboyA president who allowed convicted criminals to be awarded government contracts?
AS opposed to Clinton putting them in the cabinet?
Well, now, if you want to get into THAT...
The Reagan administration wound up with almost thirty felony convictions.
The Clinton administration had, what... three?
So far, Bush has stayed just under Clinton's numbers (one convicted felon in charge of "Homeland Security", one internationally wanted war criminal in the person of Henry Kissinger) but he's got his third waiting in the wings, if the government's still planning on installing what's-his-face as the puppet leader after we leave...
Not exactly something to be proud of. At least in Clinton's years we made a little forward progress.
Kansas-born and deeply ashamed The last living La Parka Marka
"They that can give up essential liberty to gain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin
" Seeing these wrestling managers walking around with their big guts or their big breasts or their big mouths gave us hop that someday, we too could be part of the show, even if we weren't 6'5" with expletives tattooed on the back of our necks. Plus, anyone getting paid thousands of dollars to stand around in neon suits yelling 'KILL HIM!' towards the ring was certainly a profession to look forward to." http://www.x-entertainment.com/messages/559.html
Originally posted by IsaacYankem And then there's this.. "When the contract was awarded, two weeks ago, the Administration did not mention that the bin Laden family has an ongoing relationship with Bechtel"
Next up, Colin Powell and Osama! We'll connect them!
Osama's family is rich. OF COURSE they have investments. And it is not even Bechtel they are involved in, it is a company Bechtel helped found- an INDEPENDANT company. You act like Osama himself is the CEO of Bechtel!
Too bad they didn't find a document that proves that Osama really is the CEO of Bechtel in Iraq.
Roxanne from The Real Cancun on being famous: "I'd rather be known for [dancing topless with my twin sister] instead of being smart or something. There's a million people who are smart. There's only 16 of us who were in Cancun together."
I've never understood why they won't execute someone who is insane. It seems to me that they would be the first ones who SHOULD be executed. If someone is stark raving mad and a killer, why go easy on them?