The W
Views: 99111593
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Calendar | Color chart | Log in for more!
21.9.14 1925
The W - Football - NFL Playoff Seedings After Week 10
This thread has 2 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
Thread rated: 5.44
Pages: 1
(1340 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (11 total)
JayJayDean
Scrapple








Since: 2.1.02
From: Seattle, WA

Since last post: 18 days
Last activity: 1 day
AIM:  
Y!:
#1 Posted on | Instant Rating: 7.25
NFL PLAYOFF SEEDINGS AFTER WEEK 9

AFC
1. Indianapolis (9-0) AFC South leaders
2. Denver (7-2) AFC West leaders
3. Pittsburgh (7-2) AFC North leaders
4. New England (5-4) AFC East leaders
5. Cincinnati (7-2) Wild card
6. Jacksonville (6-3) Wild card

7. San Diego (5-4)
8. Kansas City (5-4)
9. Buffalo (4-5)
10. Oakland (3-6)
11. Miami (3-6)
12. Cleveland (3-6)
13. Tennessee (2-7)
14. Baltimore (2-7)
15. N.Y. Jets (2-7)
16. Houston (1-8)

NFC
1. Seattle (7-2) NFC West leaders
2. Carolina (7-2) NFC South leaders
3. Chicago (6-3) NFC North leaders
4. Dallas (6-3) NFC East leaders
5. N.Y. Giants (6-3) Wild card
6. Atlanta (6-3) Wild card

7. Tampa Bay (6-3)
8. Washington (5-4)
9. Minnesota (4-5)
10. St. Louis (4-5)
11. Detroit (4-5)
12. Philadelphia (4-5)
13. Green Bay (2-7)
14. New Orleans (2-7)
15. Arizona (2-7)
16. San Francisco (2-7)

Wild Card Matchups:
AFC: Jacksonville at Pittsburgh, Cincinnati at New England
NFC: Atlanta at Chicago, N.Y. Giants at Dallas

First-round byes:
AFC: Indianapolis, Denver
NFC: Seattle, Carolina



"You know what you need?
Some new quotes in your sig.
Yeah, I said it."
-- DJFrostyFreeze

Promote this thread!
whatever
Lap cheong








Since: 12.2.02
From: Cleveland, Ohio

Since last post: 35 days
Last activity: 2 hours
#2 Posted on | Instant Rating: 5.53
New England is turning into the Padres of the NFL this year.

I like the way this year is shaping up. Looking at the potential playoff matchups is intriguing.



"Lita holds a Stone Cold Steve Austin home pregnancy test. What will the Bottom Line say? “Hell Yeah” or “Eh-EH”?" - Raw Satire, 6/15/04
(Apparantly ours said "Hell Yeah", 03/08/05)

brick
Bockwurst








Since: 17.1.02
From: Pittsburgh, PA

Since last post: 507 days
Last activity: 503 days
#3 Posted on | Instant Rating: 5.33
and the draft order:

1 TEXANS 0.630
2 JETS 0.444
3 CARDINALS 0.472
4 49ERS 0.481
5 PACKERS 0.519
6 TITANS 0.593
7 RAVENS 0.630
8 SAINTS 0.704
9 DOLPHINS 0.407
10 BROWNS 0.500
11 RAIDERS 0.630
12 BILLS 0.370
13 RAMS 0.407
14 LIONS 0.444 *
14 VIKINGS 0.444 *
16 EAGLES 0.639
17 CHIEFS 0.556 *
17 CHARGERS 0.556 *
19 REDSKINS 0.622
20 BUCCANEERS 6 0.556

* indicates tie, order to be determined by coin flip.
R-Dub
Mettwurst








Since: 25.8.05
From: Michigan

Since last post: 193 days
Last activity: 45 days
#4 Posted on | Instant Rating: 4.00
Well, there goes my utopia. All of a sudden, the NFC North decides to look respectable (well, kinda). Say it ain't so! If this keeps up, they could have 3 teams over .500. Let's see, what's on the radar? Carolina @ Chicago. Detroit @ Dallas. Minnesota @ Green Bay. So, if all goes well, it could look like this:

Chicago 6 - 4
Minnesota 4 - 6
Detroit 4 - 6
Green Bay 3 - 7

And that's if GB can actually get a win. Well, anything's possible. At least I hope so. From there, it starts looking tougher for Chicago (Tampa, Pittsburgh, & Atlanta over the next month). Well, I guess there is still hope. But with these teams, who knows? But a man can dream....
Jaguar
Knackwurst








Since: 23.1.02
From: Phoenix, AZ

Since last post: 167 days
Last activity: 167 days
#5 Posted on | Instant Rating: 4.61
So what was the story with the Buffalo/KC game? KC just showing their age, or what?



The little boat gently drifted across the pond exactly the way a bowling ball wouldn't.



And if our transcendental "if" should find a final floor
Then man will know the death of God where wonder was before
Whitebacon
Boudin blanc








Since: 12.1.02
From: Fresno, CA

Since last post: 35 days
Last activity: 16 hours
AIM:  
ICQ:  
#6 Posted on | Instant Rating: 8.00
As best I can tell, Green got sacked six times, threw three picks, and lost a fumble, while Larry Johnson ran for 130 yards, and had another 40 receiving. I think you can put the blame on a shitty receiver corps.



Can you touch a rainbow? Can you put the wind in your pocket? No! Such is Neifi!

TheMark 9.6.05 2227.30 - 9.6.05 2242.29. Gone, but not forgotten.
Reverend J Shaft
Liverwurst








Since: 25.6.03
From: Home of The Big House

Since last post: 9 days
Last activity: 14 hours
#7 Posted on | Instant Rating: 5.00
(deleted by Reverend J Shaft on 16.11.05 0902)
wesman1111
Cotto








Since: 2.1.02
From: Harrisonville, MO

Since last post: 2083 days
Last activity: 5 days
#8 Posted on | Instant Rating: 5.00
    Originally posted by Whitebacon
    Green got sacked six times

    Originally posted by Whitebacon
    I think you can put the blame on a shitty receiver corps.

Green had no protection all day. I heard someone describe the O-line as Swiss cheese yesterday, and that pretty much summed it up perfectly. With Roaf out and Shields hurting, the Bills were able to rush at will whenever the Chiefs were in a passing situation. While the Chiefs don't have any all-pro type receivers, there was nothing about the way the game went that could be blamed on them.
haz
Landjager








Since: 2.1.02
From: Whitby, Ontario, Canada

Since last post: 40 days
Last activity: 4 days
#9 Posted on | Instant Rating: 4.00
    Originally posted by wesman1111
      Originally posted by Whitebacon
      Green got sacked six times

      Originally posted by Whitebacon
      I think you can put the blame on a shitty receiver corps.

    Green had no protection all day. I heard someone describe the O-line as Swiss cheese yesterday, and that pretty much summed it up perfectly. With Roaf out and Shields hurting, the Bills were able to rush at will whenever the Chiefs were in a passing situation. While the Chiefs don't have any all-pro type receivers, there was nothing about the way the game went that could be blamed on them.


Isn't this handy... I was at the Ralph on Sunday for the Bills-Chiefs tilt.

In terms of the Chiefs offense, they ran roughshod over the Bills D with LJ from the very start.

However, as soon as they started to pass, everything went wrong. Yes, Green had a lot of pressure, but he also threw a lot of really bad balls. He hit Gonzalez down the middle at will, but as soon as he tried to throw outside, he was nowhere near the receivers...

They should've continued to give the ball to LJ. He ended up with 140 yards and could've had 200 if they kept going to him...

In terms of Buffalos offense, they made very few plays. Losman came in for Holcomb, who got his bell rung. Losman played pretty well, made two outstanding TD throws and that was it...




Where the wild are strong, and the strong are the darkest ones, you're the Darkest One.
Whitebacon
Boudin blanc








Since: 12.1.02
From: Fresno, CA

Since last post: 35 days
Last activity: 16 hours
AIM:  
ICQ:  
#10 Posted on | Instant Rating: 8.00
    Originally posted by wesman1111
      Originally posted by Whitebacon
      Green got sacked six times

      Originally posted by Whitebacon
      I think you can put the blame on a shitty receiver corps.

    Green had no protection all day. I heard someone describe the O-line as Swiss cheese yesterday, and that pretty much summed it up perfectly. With Roaf out and Shields hurting, the Bills were able to rush at will whenever the Chiefs were in a passing situation. While the Chiefs don't have any all-pro type receivers, there was nothing about the way the game went that could be blamed on them.


Sure there is. They can't get open against anybody, making Green have to stand in the pocket entirely too much, and allowing teams to focus on Gonzalez and leave the outside in man coverage.



Can you touch a rainbow? Can you put the wind in your pocket? No! Such is Neifi!

TheMark 9.6.05 2227.30 - 9.6.05 2242.29. Gone, but not forgotten.
haz
Landjager








Since: 2.1.02
From: Whitby, Ontario, Canada

Since last post: 40 days
Last activity: 4 days
#11 Posted on | Instant Rating: 4.56
    Originally posted by Whitebacon
      Originally posted by wesman1111
        Originally posted by Whitebacon
        Green got sacked six times

        Originally posted by Whitebacon
        I think you can put the blame on a shitty receiver corps.

      Green had no protection all day. I heard someone describe the O-line as Swiss cheese yesterday, and that pretty much summed it up perfectly. With Roaf out and Shields hurting, the Bills were able to rush at will whenever the Chiefs were in a passing situation. While the Chiefs don't have any all-pro type receivers, there was nothing about the way the game went that could be blamed on them.


    Sure there is. They can't get open against anybody, making Green have to stand in the pocket entirely too much, and allowing teams to focus on Gonzalez and leave the outside in man coverage.


As I said above, Green couldn't hit the broad side of a barn on Sunday, whether the WR's were open or not. There were a couple of plays where the wideout did a quick out, got some spacing, but Green put the ball 6 feet outside of where he was supposed to.

IMO, Sunday's passing struggles were on Green totally.





Where the wild are strong, and the strong are the darkest ones, you're the Darkest One.
Thread rated: 5.44
Pages: 1
Thread ahead: College Football Conference Champions Report
Next thread: The State of the BCS - Week 5
Previous thread: Terrell Owens suspended indefinitely
(1340 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
(starting a new thread so that this doesn't turn into my monster Conan O'Brien thread that Zed became not-too-fond of) Ben Roethlisberger was suspended for six games on Wednesday for violating the NFL's personal conduct policy, the NFL announced.
Related threads: NFL Playoff Seedings After Week 9 - NFL Playoff Seedings After Week 7 - NFL Playoff Seedings After Week 6 - More...
The W - Football - NFL Playoff Seedings After Week 10Register and log in to post!

The W™ message board

ZimBoard
©2001-2014 Brothers Zim

This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.133 seconds.