The W
Views: 97804119
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Calendar | Color chart | Log in for more!
30.7.14 0418
The W - Football - NFL Playoff seedings after week 10
This thread has 3 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
Thread rated: 6.01
Pages: 1
(1891 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (9 total)
JayJayDean
Scrapple








Since: 2.1.02
From: Seattle, WA

Since last post: 8 days
Last activity: 15 hours
AIM:  
Y!:
#1 Posted on | Instant Rating: 7.21
NFL PLAYOFF SEEDINGS AFTER WEEK 10

AFC
1. Kansas City (9-0) AFC West leaders
2. New England (7-2) AFC East leaders
3. Indianapolis (7-2) AFC South leaders
4. Baltimore (5-4) AFC North leaders
5. Tennessee (7-2) Wild card
6. Denver (5-4) Wild card

7. Miami (5-4)
8. Buffalo (4-5)
9. Cincinnati (4-5)
10. N. Y. Jets (3-6)
11. Houston (3-6)
12. Cleveland (3-6)
13. Pittsburgh (3-6)
14. Oakland (2-7)
15. Jacksonville (2-7)
16. San Diego (2-7)

NFC
1. Carolina (7-2) NFC South leaders
2. Dallas (7-2) NFC East leaders
3. Seattle (6-3) NFC West leaders
4. Minnesota (6-3) NFC North leaders
5. Philadelphia (6-3) Wild card
6. St. Louis (6-3) Wild card

7. Green Bay (4-5)
8. San Francisco (4-5)
9. New Orleans (4-5)
10. Tampa Bay (4-5)
11. Washington (4-5)
12. N. Y. Giants (4-5)
13. Detroit (3-6)
14. Arizona (3-6)
15. Chicago (3-6)
16. Atlanta (2-7)

Wild Card Matchups:
AFC: Denver at Indianapolis, Tennessee at Baltimore
NFC: St. Louis at Seattle, Philadelphia at Minnesota

First-round byes:
AFC: Kansas City, New England
NFC: Carolina, Dallas




“To get ass, you’ve got to bring ass." -- Roy Jones Jr.

"Your input has been noted.
I hope you don't take it personally if I disregard it." -- Guru Zim
Promote this thread!
Grimis
Scrapple








Since: 11.7.02
From: MD

Since last post: 1184 days
Last activity: 981 days
#2 Posted on | Instant Rating: 7.29
Whould've thunk that this late in the year you'd have Carolina and Dallas jockeying for home field advantage?

With the logjam at 5-4, the AFC North actually does have a prayer of grabbing one of the wildcard slots, if the Bengals keep winning.



BOSsportsfan34
Pepperoni








Since: 2.1.03
From: MA

Since last post: 65 days
Last activity: 27 days
AIM:  
Y!:
#3 Posted on | Instant Rating: 2.78
    Originally posted by Grimis
    Whould've thunk that this late in the year you'd have Carolina and Dallas jockeying for home field advantage?

    With the logjam at 5-4, the AFC North actually does have a prayer of grabbing one of the wildcard slots, if the Bengals keep winning.


With Miami and Buffalo reeling, it's very possible the Bengals could grab the last wild-card spot. Denver is getting Plummer back so my feeling is that they will hold on to that 6th playoff spot in the AFC.

I would also keep an eye on the Jets. They could very well make a 2nd half run like they did last year.





Sox blow another chance to win the world series. More money for me!!!!
redsoxnation
Scrapple








Since: 24.7.02

Since last post: 394 days
Last activity: 394 days
#4 Posted on | Instant Rating: 5.43
I'm trying to figure out how Washington is ahead of the Giants, since the Giants beat them head to head.
Right now, if your KC, you have to hope that Tennessee wins the AFC South, putting New England and Tennessee in the 2 and 3 holes. That means KC only has to worry about 1 of those 2 teams in the playoffs, rather than a worse case scenario of Tennessee at #5 beating Cinci or Baltimore at #4, with the Colts at 3 beating whoever #6 is. The Colts won't beat New England in January on the road, and Tennessee is one of the few teams that could go in and knock off KC. 16-0 and knocked in the first playoff game is a distinct possibility under those circumstances.



Why Pro Wrestling proves the INS cannot keep terrorists out of the United States: If a felon like Nathan Jones is allowed into the United States with no special skills (unless being totally inept in the ring counts, but I think there are enough totally inept people in the US to keep that skill from being unique or special), then how the hell can they justify keeping anyone else out?
Zeruel
Thirty Millionth Hit
Moderator








Since: 2.1.02
From: The Silver Spring in the Land of Mary.

Since last post: 1 day
Last activity: 1 hour
#5 Posted on | Instant Rating: 4.05
    Originally posted by redsoxnation
    I'm trying to figure out how Washington is ahead of the Giants, since the Giants beat them head to head.



eh, just call it a typo. you are right, he should flip-flop their rankings, because if the season ended today, washington would be under NY for that tiebreaker.




Finished week 1 of my 2002-2003 College Football raitings. Only 17 weeks to go, then I can start on this season, sigh...

Watch this space for a link to my ratings

JayJayDean
Scrapple








Since: 2.1.02
From: Seattle, WA

Since last post: 8 days
Last activity: 15 hours
AIM:  
Y!:
#6 Posted on | Instant Rating: 7.21
    Originally posted by rikidozan
      Originally posted by redsoxnation
      I'm trying to figure out how Washington is ahead of the Giants, since the Giants beat them head to head.



    eh, just call it a typo. you are right, he should flip-flop their rankings, because if the season ended today, washington would be under NY for that tiebreaker.


Seeing as I started with week two, I'd say going nine weeks before my first error is pretty good. Since the 4-5 teams tiebreaker goes to strength of victory, the revised standings go thusly:

7. N. Y. Giants (4-5)
8. Green Bay (4-5)
9. San Francisco (4-5)
10. New Orleans (4-5)
11. Tampa Bay (4-5)
12. Washington (4-5)




“To get ass, you’ve got to bring ass." -- Roy Jones Jr.

"Your input has been noted.
I hope you don't take it personally if I disregard it." -- Guru Zim
drjayphd
Scrapple
Moderator








Since: 22.4.02
From: Long Island

Since last post: 10 hours
Last activity: 10 hours
AIM:  
ICQ:  
Y!:
#7 Posted on | Instant Rating: 7.10
    Originally posted by JayJayDean
      Originally posted by rikidozan
        Originally posted by redsoxnation
        I'm trying to figure out how Washington is ahead of the Giants, since the Giants beat them head to head.



      eh, just call it a typo. you are right, he should flip-flop their rankings, because if the season ended today, washington would be under NY for that tiebreaker.


    Seeing as I started with week two, I'd say going nine weeks before my first error is pretty good. Since the 4-5 teams tiebreaker goes to strength of victory, the revised standings go thusly:

    7. N. Y. Giants (4-5)
    8. Green Bay (4-5)
    9. San Francisco (4-5)
    10. New Orleans (4-5)
    11. Tampa Bay (4-5)
    12. Washington (4-5)



A-HA! You SEE that? Giants are the next team in the playoffs! All they've gotta do is... wait... who's at #6?

(checks the standings, looks at the records)

Ohhh fuuuuuu...dge. >_<



Today's Out-Of-Context Quote, Courtesy of hardygrrl:

"...between the grime layer and the Seventies game show host hair, I'd rather rim Undertaker after a White Castle/Schlitz bender."
Net Hack Slasher
Banger








Since: 6.1.02
From: Outer reaches of your mind

Since last post: 3504 days
Last activity: 1924 days
#8 Posted on | Instant Rating: 6.66
Hehe @ Tennessee having to play at Baltimore even though even though Tennessee has two more wins. There's really a possibility that the team that will finish first in the AFC North will have a 500 record and get a home playoff game... Who says BCS is the only screwy football system in town.

Seriously the eight division with only four teams in each is kinda screwy. You are going to get some bad teams in unworthy positions.



Me fail English? That's unpossible
Mayhem
Scrapple








Since: 25.4.03
From: Nashville, TN

Since last post: 1 day
Last activity: 8 hours
#9 Posted on | Instant Rating: 4.90

I may sound biased, but I think Tennessee is playing better than anyone else in the league right now. They've put up 30 or more points in 6 straight games (one of which was a loss to a very good New England team) plus they have the league's #1 defense against the rush.



Ralph Wiggum: "We're going to Africa; land of lions and giraffes and Santa and balloons ... "
Thread rated: 6.01
Pages: 1
Thread ahead: WEEK 10 = Upset Sunday
Next thread: Homage to JayJayDean, BCS Bowl Projections for Week 12
Previous thread: Boller out for the year
(1891 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
In spite of their game against Oklahoma State, I STILL can't figure out why everyone has such a hard-on for Jason White. Besides "he's the QB for the #1 team". Anyone wanna explain this to me? Seriously, I mean it.
- drjayphd, Fitzgerald big game=Heisman? (2003)
Related threads: WEEK 10 = Upset Sunday - Coming NFL Coaching Changes - Midseason Report Cards - More...
The W - Football - NFL Playoff seedings after week 10Register and log in to post!

The W™ message board

ZimBoard
©2001-2014 Brothers Zim

This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.118 seconds.