The W
Views: 101428685
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Calendar | Color chart | Log in for more!
19.12.14 0210
The W - Pro Wrestling - Newest WWE vs Irv Munchnik drama
This thread has 10 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
Thread rated: 3.91
Pages: 1
(2070 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (5 total)
StaggerLee
Scrapple








Since: 3.10.02
From: Right side of the tracks

Since last post: 8 hours
Last activity: 8 hours
#1 Posted on | Instant Rating: 1.63
Trading letters, legal threats and calling each other liars.
WWE's Lawyers letter:
http://muchnick.net/mcdevitt121610.pdf

Irv's response:
http://wrestlingbabylon.wordpress.com/2010/12/17/new-threats-from-wwe-lawyer-jerry-mcdevitt/

A whole lot of finger pointing going on regarding concussions, wellness policy, Benoit, etc.
Promote this thread!
BigDaddyLoco
Scrapple








Since: 2.1.02

Since last post: 5 hours
Last activity: 5 hours
#2 Posted on | Instant Rating: 3.97
Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't the WWE just drawing attention to his claims with these legal threats?

PaulKTF
Summer sausage








Since: 26.5.06

Since last post: 1236 days
Last activity: 9 hours
#3 Posted on | Instant Rating: 1.00
    Originally posted by BigDaddyLoco
    Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't the WWE just drawing attention to his claims with these legal threats?




Well; I think he's the one who posted their private email on the website (If I'm understanding things correctly).
Mr. Boffo
Scrapple








Since: 24.3.02
From: Oshkosh, WI

Since last post: 508 days
Last activity: 469 days
#4 Posted on | Instant Rating: 5.77
    Originally posted by PaulKTF
      Originally posted by BigDaddyLoco
      Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't the WWE just drawing attention to his claims with these legal threats?




    Well; I think he's the one who posted their private email on the website (If I'm understanding things correctly).


Kind of off topic: Does anyone know if there's anything binding in those "THIS EMAIL IS INTENDED FOR IT'S RECIPIENT ONLY. BY OPENING THIS E-MAIL, YOU AGREE NOT TO SHARE ITS CONTENTS. IF YOU ARE NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, YOU MUST DELETE THIS E-MAIL IMMEDIATELY." texts that lawyers love to put in the footer of their messages? My first thought is that the person who gets it hasn't agreed to do any such thing, so it's just legalese by someone trying to keep their communications secret through threats. But I am not a lawyer.

(edited by Mr. Boffo on 19.12.10 1849)
InVerse
Bierwurst








Since: 26.8.02

Since last post: 2 hours
Last activity: 1 hour
#5 Posted on | Instant Rating: 4.17
    Originally posted by Mr. Boffo

    Kind of off topic: Does anyone know if there's anything binding in those "THIS EMAIL IS INTENDED FOR IT'S RECIPIENT ONLY. BY OPENING THIS E-MAIL, YOU AGREE NOT TO SHARE ITS CONTENTS. IF YOU ARE NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, YOU MUST DELETE THIS E-MAIL IMMEDIATELY." texts that lawyers love to put in the footer of their messages? My first thought is that the person who gets it hasn't agreed to do any such thing, so it's just legalese by someone trying to keep their communications secret through threats. But I am not a lawyer.



In short, no, they're not binding. In long, they're a load of crap (attrition.org). (That particular link is safe for work, some sections of the site may or may not be, depending on the type of uptight asshole for whom you work.)
Thread rated: 3.91
Pages: 1
Thread ahead: RAW #917 12/20/10
Next thread: Most Unintentionally Depressing Pro Wrestling Gimmicks
Previous thread: TLC Prediction Thread
(2070 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
The fact that everybody seems to think so many different things about the Punk angle either means it's so compelling that have to take a side, or that we've gotten so deep in the weeds in two months that we even forgot where we started from.
- BigDaddyLoco, RAW SuperShow #955 9/12/11 (2011)
The W - Pro Wrestling - Newest WWE vs Irv Munchnik dramaRegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board

ZimBoard
©2001-2014 Brothers Zim

This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 2.733 seconds.