The W
WrestleMania 33 begins in 915,802 seconds
Views: 121828245
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Calendar | Color chart | Log in for more!
23.3.17 0336
The W - Basketball - New WNBA TEAM in Chicago
This thread has 3 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
Thread rated: 5.54
Pages: 1
(915 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (3 total)
BOSsportsfan34
Pepperoni








Since: 2.1.03
From: MA

Since last post: 362 days
Last activity: 6 hours
AIM:  
#1 Posted on | Instant Rating: 3.33
http://www.wnba.com/news/chicago2006_release050208.html

No name yet for it. Since the mens team is the Bulls, would it be appropriate to call the womens team the Cows? And if they do will residents of South Park be upset they stole their teams nickname?





Isiah's Finest

Promote this thread!
Whitebacon
Banger








Since: 12.1.02
From: Fresno, CA

Since last post: 29 days
Last activity: 2 hours
AIM:  
ICQ:  
#2 Posted on | Instant Rating: 6.91
Gotta be the Chicago Heifers.

I'm sure it'll end up being somethign incredibly generic though.



TheCow
Landjager








Since: 3.1.02
From: Knoxville, TN

Since last post: 3331 days
Last activity: 3331 days
AIM:  
#3 Posted on | Instant Rating: 7.00
Like naming a WNBA team the Heifers isn't going to raise all hell. Not saying I don't agree with you, but I'd be surprised if it happened.

Of course, it IS the WNBA, so it has a chance of slipping under the radar entirely.
Thread rated: 5.54
Pages: 1
Thread ahead: AI Drops 60 on Orlando
Next thread: T-Wolves fire Flip Saunders!
Previous thread: As the Raptor Turns
(915 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
I won't hate them (Of course, why should I? The DETROIT PISTONS are the WORLD CHAMPIONS. And, no, I won't stop saying that.), especially since I think every shot taken at Malone is hilarious, even if it was cheap.
- Reverend J Shaft, Okur officially signs with Jazz... (2004)
The W - Basketball - New WNBA TEAM in ChicagoRegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board

ZimBoard
©2001-2017 Brothers Zim

This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.64 seconds.