The W
Views: 95795954
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Calendar | Color chart | Log in for more!
25.4.14 0008
The W - Basketball - New WNBA TEAM in Chicago
This thread has 3 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
Thread rated: 5.54
Pages: 1
(864 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (3 total)
BOSsportsfan34
Pepperoni








Since: 2.1.03
From: MA

Since last post: 96 days
Last activity: 5 hours
AIM:  
Y!:
#1 Posted on | Instant Rating: 3.33
http://www.wnba.com/news/chicago2006_release050208.html

No name yet for it. Since the mens team is the Bulls, would it be appropriate to call the womens team the Cows? And if they do will residents of South Park be upset they stole their teams nickname?





Isiah's Finest

Promote this thread!
Whitebacon
Boudin blanc








Since: 12.1.02
From: Fresno, CA

Since last post: 18 days
Last activity: 51 min.
AIM:  
ICQ:  
#2 Posted on | Instant Rating: 6.91
Gotta be the Chicago Heifers.

I'm sure it'll end up being somethign incredibly generic though.



TheCow
Landjager








Since: 3.1.02
From: Knoxville, TN

Since last post: 2268 days
Last activity: 2268 days
AIM:  
Y!:
#3 Posted on | Instant Rating: 7.00
Like naming a WNBA team the Heifers isn't going to raise all hell. Not saying I don't agree with you, but I'd be surprised if it happened.

Of course, it IS the WNBA, so it has a chance of slipping under the radar entirely.
Thread rated: 5.54
Pages: 1
Thread ahead: AI Drops 60 on Orlando
Next thread: T-Wolves fire Flip Saunders!
Previous thread: As the Raptor Turns
(864 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
Lets see, Kobe ass rapes a woman, isnt smart enough to make ammends before she leaves, has to pay millions in legal fees, and lost endorsements AND had to buy that big ass ring, yet, instead of being quiet and accepting responsibilities for HIS actions he...
- StaggerLee, "Shaq Paid Women Hush $$$" (2004)
The W - Basketball - New WNBA TEAM in ChicagoRegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board

ZimBoard
©2001-2014 Brothers Zim

This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.078 seconds.