The W
Views: 152338643
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Calendar | Color chart | Log in for more!
4.7.20 0650
The W - Baseball - New threads
This thread has 6 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
Thread rated: 7.62
Pages: 1
(298 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (3 total)
odessasteps
Scrapple








Since: 2.1.02
From: MD, USA

Since last post: 2208 days
Last activity: 2175 days
#1 Posted on | Instant Rating: 6.38

Any thoughts from the twin cities residents?

Uniwatch discussion here -- http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2009/11/17/see-if-they-let-me-design-it-id-redo-the-logo-like-this/



Mark Coale
Odessa Steps Magazine
ISSUE FOUR - OCTOBER 2009
Promote this thread!
CRZ
Big Brother
Administrator








Since: 9.12.01
From: ミネアポリス

Since last post: 3 days
Last activity: 16 hours
ICQ:  
#2 Posted on | Instant Rating: 8.85
I wasn't excited enough by it to start this thread myself yesterday. :)















Jimmy O
Linguica








Since: 9.1.02
From: Woodbury, MN

Since last post: 3421 days
Last activity: 1165 days
#3 Posted on
As long as they're not wearing the 1982 uniforms at home on Saturdays, which they did this season, I'm all for it. They seemed to play like the 1982 team when they wore those. For those unfamiliar, they were white, with a tinge of blue, almost like someone threw a navy-colored sock in with the wash.
Thread rated: 7.62
Pages: 1
Thread ahead: NL Cy Young 2009 = Tim Lincecum
Next thread: Scoscia and Tracy win Managers of the Year
Previous thread: Marlins' Coghlan, A's Bailey named Rookies of the Year
(298 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
I am only a part-time Baseball fan, therefore perhaps someone can enlighten me about this. After reading this thread, I started thinking about how pitchers seems to be much more fragile than they used to be. Is that true?
Related threads: Twins hosting "moving sale" - TWINS WIN 6-5 (12) - tWINs - More...
The W - Baseball - New threadsRegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board

ZimBoard
©2001-2020 Brothers Zim

This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.083 seconds.