The W
Views: 132019373
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Calendar | Color chart | Log in for more!
21.4.18 1824
The W - Movies & TV - National Treasure: Book of Secrets
This thread has 8 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
Thread rated: 3.41
Pages: 1
(3802 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
Post (6 total)

Since: 9.2.02

Since last post: 719 days
Last activity: 528 days
#1 Posted on | Instant Rating: 4.61
Eh. I suppose the National Treasure movies are somewhat comparable to the Indiana Jones series, but IMO, are left lacking. Nick Cage is good, as he was in the first NT, as is Jon Voight and Diane Kruger (Diane Kruger, all kinds of hot). Helen Mirren joins the cast as Ben's mom, and is very good. Justin Bartha, while a little over the top at times, does have some lines which are good for some laughs. Harvey Keitel is back - always good, and Ed Harris as the antagonist is great (one of the most underrated actors ever, to me). Judging by how much my kids fidgetted throughout the movie, they had about the same opinion as I did.
Promote this thread!

Since: 2.1.02
From: Seattle, WA

Since last post: 817 days
Last activity: 395 days
#2 Posted on | Instant Rating: 7.40
We took IJ to see this yesterday because with the Disney connection they had been showing ads while IJ watched her Disney shows. We bought the first one on DVD and Mrs. JJD and IJ said it was pretty good and we all enjoyed this one, although it's pretty complicated for a 5-year old so I kept having to explain it. Take that quick review FWIW, as it's from two adults who don't see too many non-kid movies anymore, so we probably have a pretty lenient curve. I don't think Ed Harris has ever been in a bad movie that I've seen, though.

Also, agreed on Diane Kruger. Yowza.

Holy fuck shit motherfucker shit. Read comics. Fuck shit shit fuck shit I sold out when I did my job. Fuck fuck fuck shit fuck. Sorry had to do it....


Revenge of the Sith = one thumb up from me. Fuck shit. I want to tittie fuck your ass.
-- The Guinness. to Cerebus

Since: 17.11.02

Since last post: 293 days
Last activity: 14 days
#3 Posted on | Instant Rating: 1.48
Did I fall asleep or something? What was the whole big deal about 'Page 47'? I even stayed around after the credits thinking they'd have something but we got nothing. It felt odd to make a point about looking at it and having it brought up at the end but not tell us anything about it.

This was almost as good as the first one, but the thing about 'Page 47' bothered the fuck outta me.

I'll still go see another one, when they make it, hopefully giving me closure.

Forget it Josh... it's Cerebustown.

Since: 12.12.01
From: Houston, Texas

Since last post: 3396 days
Last activity: 3395 days
#4 Posted on | Instant Rating: 0.79
I think Page 47 was the lead-in for the next National Treasure film. That's the only explanation I could think of.

I enjoyed the movie. It was pure cheese and lots of fun. And it very much is a modern day Indiana Jones, except not as good.
The Vile1
Lap cheong

Since: 4.9.02
From: California

Since last post: 3289 days
Last activity: 3021 days
#5 Posted on | Instant Rating: 1.99
I watched it and had a good fun time. I like the characters who are sweet and charming in their own way, especially Jon Voight's Daddy Gates.

No these aren't great movies or nowhere near the Indiana Jones films, but they aren't terrible like they make them out to be. Bruckheimer has produced much worse, and I don't think there was a single explosion in this film either (unlike the first one which had one big one at the beginning).

The only thing I didn't like was the cliche, obligatory plot device that's become so prevalent in movies these days, splitting up Cage and Kruger at the beginning. Felt stupid and forced to me. Once again like 30 Days of Night it felt there wasn't a single good reason for them to not be together. In Die Hard it was played well and realistically, no movie can really do it well anymore.

(edited by The Vile1 on 26.12.07 2321)

Don't make the Professor angry. You wouldn't like him, when he's angry.
It's False

Since: 20.6.02
From: I am the Tag Team Champions!

Since last post: 31 days
Last activity: 31 days
#6 Posted on | Instant Rating: 4.83
Saw it myself tonight and enjoyed myself. They're not the cream of the crop, but who really cares? It's a fun romp and I'm starting to genuinely like this series. The reason, more than anything, is because the "Indiana Jones"-type exploration adventure film is a genre that's been sorely underused in Hollywood films these days. It's a lot of fun and I'll be eagerly anticipating the third film.

"Wocka Wocka...who wants to hear a funny-ass joke?"
Thread rated: 3.41
Pages: 1
Thread ahead: ALIENS VS. PREDATOR: REQUIEM (slight spoilers)
Next thread: Weekend Box Office results: 12/21/07-12/23/07
Previous thread: TV Ratings 12/17 - 12/23
(3802 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
Solid, entertaining legal thriller with Matthew McConaughey doing his leading man best work (that I've seen, I've skipped all of his romantic comedies) since A Time To Kill. It's not gonna win any Oscars, but it's a well-made Hollywood movie.
- John Orquiola, The Lincoln Lawyer (2011)
Related threads: Did anyone else accidentally go see NATIONAL TREASURE? - More...
The W - Movies & TV - National Treasure: Book of SecretsRegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board

©2001-2018 Brothers Zim

This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.415 seconds.