The W
Views: 100224057
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Calendar | Color chart | Log in for more!
30.10.14 0805
The W - Baseball - Mike Lowell traded to Rangers
This thread has 4 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
Thread rated: 4.65
Pages: 1
(253 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (8 total)
It's False
Scrapple








Since: 20.6.02
From: I am the Tag Team Champions!

Since last post: 2 days
Last activity: 15 hours
#1 Posted on | Instant Rating: 4.32
The Red Sox might be kicking themselves over this one for a while.

Report: Boston Red Sox trade Mike Lowell to Texas Rangers for Max Ramirez


    INDIANAPOLIS -- The Boston Red Sox have reached a preliminary agreement to trade third baseman Mike Lowell to the Texas Rangers for catcher Max Ramirez, according to a report on FoxSports. The deal is contingent, according to the report, on the players passing physicals and approval by Red Sox owners of absorbing a considerable chunk of Lowell's $12 million salary.


The kicker, of course, is that the Sox are still on the hook for a chunk of Lowell's contract. That'll bite them later on, I'm sure.




All hail the Hypno-Toad
Promote this thread!
Big Bad
Scrapple








Since: 4.1.02
From: Dorchester, Ontario

Since last post: 7 hours
Last activity: 6 hours
#2 Posted on | Instant Rating: 5.63
The Rangers are busy bees, picking up Lowell on the same day that they sign Rich Harden and deal Kevin Millwood to Baltimore (sports.yahoo.com). They save a bunch of money in the process and made their team better overall --- I like Lowell's bat out of the DH spot, Texas was badly in need of a good righty hitter last season.



Kirk, crackers are a family food. Happy families. Maybe single people eat crackers, we don't know. Frankly, we don't want to know. It's a market we can do without.
Gugs
Bierwurst








Since: 9.7.02
From: Sleep (That's where I'm a viking)

Since last post: 525 days
Last activity: 4 days
AIM:  
Y!:
#3 Posted on | Instant Rating: 1.85
Lowell still has value as a potential DH. However, like Jason Bay, the Red Sox would use him in the field, where his glove greatly takes away from that value. I'm hoping that this deal means the Sox are going to go ahead and sign Adrian Beltre.
redsoxnation
Scrapple








Since: 24.7.02

Since last post: 486 days
Last activity: 486 days
#4 Posted on | Instant Rating: 4.87
    Originally posted by Gugs
    Lowell still has value as a potential DH. However, like Jason Bay, the Red Sox would use him in the field, where his glove greatly takes away from that value. I'm hoping that this deal means the Sox are going to go ahead and sign Adrian Beltre.






So, the Red Sox will be paying essentially $22 million for a 3rd baseman this year(Beltre/Lowell payoff) and $15 million for a shortstop (Scutaro/Lugo payoff). At least the Sox are cornering the market on Ramirez's not named Manny or Hanley, and we have Boof Bonser, which I think has to translate into Ramon Ramirez.
spf
Scrapple








Since: 2.1.02
From: The Las Vegas of Canada

Since last post: 17 days
Last activity: 9 hours
AIM:  
#5 Posted on | Instant Rating: 5.16
When you have an essentially limitless payroll, you can spend 22 million on your 3B who isn't A-Rod.

Figure they go out and sign Beltre and Holliday, that should put them in a nice position.



2007 and 2008 W-League Fantasy Football champion!
BigDaddyLoco
Scrapple








Since: 2.1.02

Since last post: 11 hours
Last activity: 11 hours
#6 Posted on | Instant Rating: 3.32
So, does Theo still walk on water? The guy seems to dodge a lot of heat for these bad contracts that would sink other GMs.
supersalvadoran
Landjager








Since: 10.1.08
From: westbury, new york

Since last post: 15 days
Last activity: 12 days
#7 Posted on | Instant Rating: 4.12
I really don't understand the love for Beltre. He's a one year hit wonder who has underperformed all throughout his career and has now becomed injury-prone the couple of years. I know Lowell isn't that great defensively, but he was and still is (IMO) a solid run producer. If you're going to pay most of his salary off anyway, you might as well keep him for one more year and see if you can improve the 3B spot then. I don't think the Red Sox are doing themselves any favors by switching him for someone who doesn't provide much of an upgrade in the lineup, if any, at all.






JayJayDean
Scrapple








Since: 2.1.02
From: Seattle, WA

Since last post: 57 days
Last activity: 17 hours
AIM:  
Y!:
#8 Posted on | Instant Rating: 7.29
    Originally posted by supersalvadoran
    I really don't understand the love for Beltre. He's a one year hit wonder who has underperformed all throughout his career and has now becomed injury-prone the couple of years.


Actually, Beltre OVER-performed for one year and has been quite good for the Mariners, with an OPS+ over 100 from 2006-2008 (Safeco Field ruins his offense) and the best defense at third base for his entire Mariner contract.

Fangraphs.com figures his value over the last five years at $61.2 mil, not too far below his $65 million-contract. I'd take Beltre back as a Mariner in a heartbeat.



Holy fuck shit motherfucker shit. Read comics. Fuck shit shit fuck shit I sold out when I did my job. Fuck fuck fuck shit fuck. Sorry had to do it....

*snip*

Revenge of the Sith = one thumb up from me. Fuck shit. I want to tittie fuck your ass.
-- The Guinness. to Cerebus
Thread rated: 4.65
Pages: 1
Thread ahead: Lackey Boston Bound
Next thread: Peter Gammons to Leave ESPN
Previous thread: Tigers Fire Sale About to Start (The Rich get richer?)
(253 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
Somehow seems fit that the two leading wildcarders 20 years after 1984 are the Cubs and the vile Padres. And I get to sit and watch Prior pitch spineless baseball in the first game of the crucial series...gaaah!
- Eddie Famous, Revenge on the Padres! (2004)
Related threads: Haha, holy shit, 30-3? - Rangers Sign Sammy Sosa - Carlos Lee, thanks for playing - More...
The W - Baseball - Mike Lowell traded to RangersRegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board

ZimBoard
©2001-2014 Brothers Zim

This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.089 seconds.