The W
Views: 100049534
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Calendar | Color chart | Log in for more!
25.10.14 1558
The W - Movies & TV - Mercedes McNab of Buffy the Vampire Slayer fame in playboy
This thread has 918 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
Thread rated: 4.36
Pages: 1
(3897 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (11 total)
StaggerLee
Scrapple








Since: 3.10.02
From: Right side of the tracks

Since last post: 7 days
Last activity: 5 days
#1 Posted on | Instant Rating: 2.18
http://wwtdd.com/post.phtml?pk=1428

Obviously NSFW
Promote this thread!
Torchslasher
Knackwurst








Since: 17.1.02
From: New F'n Jersey

Since last post: 2 days
Last activity: 2 days
#2 Posted on | Instant Rating: 5.75
The comments after the pictures are almost more entertaining than the pictures of a naked Ex-Buffy star. They really love to use the word "wonky" a lot.



Click Here (czwfans.com)

For all your CZW and Nickels Trivia information.


"Look guys, it's 'Lake Man!' Hope you can fit into our NARROW office, Mr. Big Lake" --MST3K The Collection V. 7

Click Here (myspace.com)
Rudoublesedoublel
Potato korv








Since: 2.1.02
From: Kentucky - Home of the 8 time NCAA Champ Wildcats

Since last post: 37 days
Last activity: 4 days
#3 Posted on | Instant Rating: 6.26
Harmony looked good, but I'd have preferred Eliza Dushku.

Creepier if you remember her appearance in the Adams Family movies though.



University of Kentucky basketball isn't a matter of life and death, it's much more important than that.
JST
Toulouse








Since: 20.1.02
From: Quebec City, CAN

Since last post: 53 days
Last activity: 14 hours
#4 Posted on | Instant Rating: 5.81
So, are these made with real girlscouts?



Jackson
Sujuk








Since: 4.1.02

Since last post: 1992 days
Last activity: 1517 days
#5 Posted on | Instant Rating: 2.10
    Originally posted by Torchslasher
    The comments after the pictures are almost more entertaining than the pictures of a naked Ex-Buffy star.


The tremendously high standards of the typical internet male are always hilarious.



TheBucsFan
TheChiefsFan








Since: 2.1.02

Since last post: 74 days
Last activity: 74 days
#6 Posted on | Instant Rating: 4.25
    Originally posted by Jackson
      Originally posted by Torchslasher
      The comments after the pictures are almost more entertaining than the pictures of a naked Ex-Buffy star.


    The tremendously high standards of the typical internet male are always hilarious.


1. Not everyone gets off on pictures of a random naked woman (I'm not necessarily saying that applies to Torchslasher, though; he doesn't even really pass judgment on the photos, he just says the comments are funny).

2. If your field of consideration is all naked pictures available on the Internet, why not have high standards?

Er, I mean ... look how MANLY you are as you imply the enjoyment you get from masturbating to these pictures!
Jackson
Sujuk








Since: 4.1.02

Since last post: 1992 days
Last activity: 1517 days
#7 Posted on | Instant Rating: 2.10
For fuck's sake, I was just backing up his claim that the comments section was funny. It contained the usual insane nitpicking found in most of these type of threads.

I don't think I am the one trying to be too MANLY here.



Kevintripod
Boudin blanc








Since: 11.5.03
From: Mount Pleasant, Pa.

Since last post: 2 days
Last activity: 18 hours
AIM:  
#8 Posted on | Instant Rating: 5.20
Playboy has a beautiful looking naked actress posing for them, and what do they do ? Half the pics they use for the pictorial seem to have been taken from thirty feet away.

Way to go Playboy.



"F*cking Chuck Norris."
Hogan's My Dad
Andouille








Since: 8.6.02
From: Canada

Since last post: 1 day
Last activity: 1 day
#9 Posted on | Instant Rating: 3.89
I don't know if you would ascribe this opinion to "high standards", but I found the pictures unspectacular. The thing is, Playboy has this tendency to make absolutely every naked woman look exactly the same (not helped, certainly, by their very genetically limited field of models) and I just find it annoying. And also, I was good friends with a photographer, and you'd be surprised how many of these broads are ug-o's pre make-up/flattering angles/airbrushing...

But far be it for me to prevent anyone from beatin' it.



It hurts to be a wrestling fan.
dMp
Banger








Since: 4.1.02
From: The Hague, Netherlands (Europe)

Since last post: 1 hour
Last activity: 1 hour
#10 Posted on | Instant Rating: 6.04
Problem with celeb layouts is that I believe most of the time they decide what gets used.
So often they go for the "it has to look sophisticated" look of things. So lots of tropical surroundings, lots of artistic photos. The focus is not on their nakedness but on making a artistic image and layout.

The playboy centerfolds and such, that's a different story all together. As you said, often it's the same type of body, vibe, look,etc.
I liked those Newsstand special editions they had a lot more. Often the whole vibe wasn't as contrived, just hot women in various states of undress looking hot.

(edited by dMp on 11.10.06 1332)


*sigh* Why bother?
Jackson
Sujuk








Since: 4.1.02

Since last post: 1992 days
Last activity: 1517 days
#11 Posted on | Instant Rating: 2.10
This blatantly stolen Fark cliche says it best.





Thread rated: 4.36
Pages: 1
Thread ahead: Heroes 1x3 - "One Giant Leap"
Next thread: Season 10, Show 2 (I have such a ragin' clue)
Previous thread: New STAR WARS sequel!
(3897 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
ShowNetworkDateRat18RSunday Night FootballNBC7Sun12.08.1HouseFOX2Tue8.85.5FringeFOX2Tue8.25.2Football Night In AmericaNBC7Sun6.84.4The 60th Primetime Emmy AwardsABCSun8.23.8BonesFOX3Wed6.13.2America's Got Talent (Wed)NBC3Wed7.53.
- Mr. Boffo, TV Ratings 9/15 - 9/21 (2008)
Related threads: Buffy: Chaos Bleeds preview - Another James Marsters Interview - NYT Profile on James Marsters (Spike) - More...
The W - Movies & TV - Mercedes McNab of Buffy the Vampire Slayer fame in playboyRegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board

ZimBoard
©2001-2014 Brothers Zim

This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.187 seconds.