The W
February 23, 2017 - mayflower.jpg
Views: 178584505
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Calendar | Color chart | Log in for more!
19.3.24 0029
The W - Current Events & Politics - Major Stem Cell Researcher's work fraudulent
This thread has 2 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
Thread rated: 6.33
Pages: 1
(677 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (3 total)
AWArulz
Scrapple








Since: 28.1.02
From: Louisville, KY

Since last post: 90 days
Last activity: 90 days
#1 Posted on | Instant Rating: 7.19
Look, I don't know too much about Stem Cell research. I know that the claim is that these cells will somehow replace bad cells in ailing people. Here's been my beef: I believe that life begins at conception and that using embryos to create these stem cells is morally wrong. We have debated that point here before, and I am certain will debate it here again.

But it seems like the major researcher and scientist in this field is full of crap. http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2005/12/24/MNGBOGD4GF1.DTL

How does this impact this controversial science? One person (admittedly, like me, pro-life) calls this Hwang "The whole field". And this story http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8061078/from/RL.4/ from June seems to indicate the relative truth of that statement. Hwang is being treated almost god-like in that article.





We'll be back right after order has been restored here in the Omni Center.
Promote this thread!
El Nastio
Banger








Since: 14.1.02
From: Ottawa Ontario, by way of Walkerton

Since last post: 34 days
Last activity: 19 days
ICQ:  
#2 Posted on | Instant Rating: 6.80
Some articles I've read about this say things like "This kind of error is a grave act that damages the foundation of science," (from the AP). Those are rather big words to say the least.


AWA, I'm with you on the whole "life begins at conception" thing. This definitly strikes a blow against stem-cell reasearch....



Or does it?


There has been MAD significant break-throughs when it comes to stem cells which don't require dead babies (umbilical cords for one). Hopefully, the stem-cell reasearch that doesn't require dead children won't get tossed because of this guy.



To celebrate the upcoming Troll Amnesty (and for otherwise no reason at all), I present to you the very best of Trolling here on The W. This Troll Moment of the Week is brought to you by;

ChrisJo, who brought us such pieces as wisdom as: "What does that have 2 do with anything? U want proper spelling, read a book. All I want is for someone to actually express some sort of opinion about this subject. I thought this was a WRESTLING forum."

Click Here (The W) to read the rest of it!

BXVI
Jaguar
Knackwurst








Since: 23.1.02
From: In a Blue State finally

Since last post: 1894 days
Last activity: 1894 days
#3 Posted on | Instant Rating: 4.61
It probably sets the whole of Stem Cell research back about 3-8 years from where everybody thought it was. And seeing as how this will prove to be some great pundit talk fodder now that the "Happy Holidays Crisis" is coming to an end, I'm sure we'll be hearing about it for long enough to cause some more avenues of US funding to dry up.

But in the end, if there's something to be learned from Stem Cells, someone is going to find it. There just won't be any American scientists appending their names to the findings this time around.



Thread rated: 6.33
Pages: 1
Thread ahead: Bush authorized NSA spying without a warran
Next thread: We need to end this war NOW!
Previous thread: You are being watched! A dark day for libraries and liberty.
(677 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
Reuters says in this article that Bill O'Reilly and Andrea Mackris have settled their cases against each other. What I'll miss most is Keith Olbermann's "your entertainment money in use" nightly reports on the whole case.
The W - Current Events & Politics - Major Stem Cell Researcher's work fraudulentRegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board

ZimBoard
©2001-2024 Brothers Zim

This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.167 seconds.