Originally posted by Parts UnknownOops! Sorry...though it's hard to tell, that's the *NEW IMPROVED Christina Aguilera (I think she's going for the Pink vibe or something these days).
Shakira has a much bigger booty, I think.
No -- Christina's going for the alter-ego-I-need-press-badly-before-I'm-on-Celebrity Boot Camp mode.
"People say, how can I help on this war against terror? How can I fight evil? You can do so by mentoring a child; by going into a shut-in's house and say I love you."— George W. Bush, Washington, D.C., Sept. 19, 2002
Originally posted by dMpAnd what does Splork mean?
Not a bad picture. I dont like C.A. but the whole picture is good.
Trust me, you don't want to know what Splork means :-)
CA really is attention-starved huh? Wow, first Britney is exposed as having had sex, and now Christina totally turns on her fan base (the teenaged girls who bought her first album). WHERE HAVE ALL THE ROLE MODELS GONE?
She's still hot though.
"Oh, a handful of change. I guess I can use this to go...um...buy some candy. So thank you for adding a step to my Halloween process"- homestarrunner
Okay, I may seem like even more of a weirdo than usual here, but as a wise man once said "I wouldn't fuck her with Bea Arthur's dick." I was never a big fan of her to begin with (hey, I like women who look like they've eaten meals that didn't get vomited right back up) but now she looks so skanky and just icky i feel like there'd be a slime trail wherever you touch her. I respect her desperate attempt at reinvention, but that doesn't mean I need to like it ;)
You all realize she's just one album flop away from doing Playboy,not like we haven't seen it all anyway. Same for Ms. Spears as well.
Their is a line between being hot and being skanky. Let's just say Christina is building a mansion on the skanky side. Hell,I find Bonnie Hunt wearing those black-rimmed glasses hotter the Ms. Aug.....Age...Agaulier.....ah dammit Christina.
(edited by ICEMAN on 30.10.02 1304)
Does this look like a man who would dry hump a mannequin?
Canon > Kodak. Period. Lens quality, sensor quality, you name it. Kodak isn't as horrid as some would have you believe, but it does not stack up to Canon (or Nikon for that matter) and I would easily pay more for one.