Please note that I'm a die-hard Patriots fan, hence I might be a little biased.
I really think he has a point, that the new divisions suck ass. The Patriots had to play the Bills, the Jets, and the Dolphins twice, the worst record of which was 8-8. The two weaker divisions(and the two divisions of which the Wild Card teams came from) both had two teams in the division with losing records. The new divisions kill the parity the NFL has worked for, by giving quite a few teams too many easy games.
A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves money from the public treasure. From that moment on the majority always votes for the candidates promising the most money from the public treasury, with the result that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy followed by a dictatorship.
The average age of the world's great civilizations has been two hundred years. These nations have progressed through the following sequence: from bondage to spiritual faith, from spiritual faith to great courage, from courage to liberty, from liberty to abundance, from abundance to selfishness, from selfishness to complacency from complacency to apathy, from apathy to dependency, from dependency back to bondage.
I sense that Kraft is just saying this to excuse the fact that his Superbowl champs didnt make the playoffs. He may be a powerful owner but Taglibue is the most powerful man in sports and I dont see him bending to pressure of a few whiny owners. The NFL system is fine the way it is, and the strength of the divisions will work itself out.
Ya know how we do it, big balling and big blingin'....
The talk is we'll see this playoff system (4 division winners plus two wildcards) for this season and next. If there are no problems with it, it'll stay that way.
Another option I've heard about (no source to link to, but I heard it on ESPN radio around the holidays) was the 4 division winners plus THREE wildcards, with the team with the best record of the division winners getting the only first-round bye. Two plays seven, three plays six, four plays five...lowest remaining seed plays the one seed.
"No team that has lost in the first round of the playoffs has ever gone on to win the Super Bowl." - Dave Letterman, January 6, 2003.
No, no, no!!!!!!!! Please leave it with just six team from each conference. That's the best part about the NFL. The playoffs are not watered down like the NBA and NHL. I have no problem going back to 3 divisions and 3 wildcards, but please don't add teams to the playoffs. 8-8 teams don't deserve to be in, and 9-7 teams should feel fortunate if they do indeed get in.
I like the current divisional format. It has put even more focus into the interdivisional games. If you can go 6-0 in your division you are almost a lock to win your division and in the drivers seat for a first round bye. Go .500 the rest of the way and you end up at 11-5. The second place team would have to go 8-2 with the rest of their games in order to finish 12-4 (assuming they go 4-2 in the division because they lose the tiebreaker.)
As for the playoffs, I don't see what the problem is. The top 2 teams deserve a week off for playing consistantly well for 16 weeks. Add more teams and you dillute the playoffs like the NHL and the NBA.
From the infamous Wrestleline SS interview:
DTD: If you were to make changes in WCW, if you were in charge and not Ric Flair, what would they be?
SS: I'd get rid of all the old guys, and push the talent that has waited to get the push. The things they are doing, it's back in the 1980s. It's just bad, man. Flair doesn't even deserve to be on the show. You've got to get rid of all the old guys. Like what Vince did, they started pushing guys. Nobody knew who The Rock was 2 years ago. He made The Rock. Now The Rock just did Saturday Night Live. You've got to start with the young talent, talent people can relate to. Who are we trying to relate to if we've got a 50 year old man out there? Are we trying to relate, so a 50 year people and above will go out and buy a f*cking little toy? That ain't gonna happen. It's a f*cking joke.
Considering that Kraft is one of the most powerful owners in the NFL right now, I think that this has a good shot of happening
For some reason I don't remember Bob Kraft bitching about the bye week last season when it benefitted his team. If you put 16 teams in the playoffs overall, your going to have at least 1 sub .500 team a year in. And, if your not going to get a bye week if your the 1 or 2 seed, why even try the last week of the season, you can rest your regulars then, and that could knock out/bring in teams from the edge into the playoffs. The current system is working fine, no reason at all to screw it up.
Please help control the McMahon population. Have your Triple H's spayed or neutered.
My God, he wants half of all teams to make the playoffs. That's WAY TOO MANY.
I remember, I saw a site once that listed what the person believed was the correct % of teams that should make playoffs in any sport. I forget what that site was though. It was some Anti-BCS College Football Playoff Site with some long .com name. Oh well.
EDIT: I found it. It was http://www.collegeplayoffs.com/ . The people there recommend that 37% of all teams in a league make the playoffs, although they don't really explain why, unless I'm missing it. .37*32=11.84, or approximately the 12 teams we have now.
I say keep it at 6 per conference. 8 is too many, and 7 is just weird.
The "we play in a tough division" argument doesn't hold any water. Teams change drastically from year to year. On paper, the NFC South was the weakest division before the season, and they ended up with two playoffs teams, one near-miss and a 7-9 club.
"If you go out with a girl and they say she has a great personality, she's ugly. If they tell you a guy works hard, he can't play a lick. Same thing." -- Charles Barkley
you guys probably would need Montana or Young to walk out and take the first snap to beat the rams... nothing against the pats rams all the way baby Dont you wish that you were me??? no?.... i've got two words for ya!