The reason I've heard is Plummer is 32 and would rather retire than switch cities. I'm glad he's not coming here. I would much rather go after Jeff Garcia. If we can't get him I'll take Simms and Rattay fighting it out with a new draft pick.
Plummer wants to be guaranteed starting qb status in order to be traded. Good luck with that buddy.
(edited by Santa Sangre on 2.3.07 1538) "I'm one of the last cats, puttin the flavor back into rap"
Ladies and gentlemen, the following public service message is brought to you by your friends from D-Generation X, who would like to remind each and every one of you that if you're not down with that, we've got two words for you...
Originally posted by Santa SangreI would much rather go after Jeff Garcia. If we can't get him I'll take Simms and Rattay fighting it out with a new draft pick.
Rattay ain't in the picture. The team's let him go and has no plans of resigning him. Simms is the guy unless we can bring a guy like Garcia (who I prefer ten thousand times over a hack like Plummer) on board to challenge him, which was really the ideal scenario all along.
And there's no way we draft a QB high. CJ (who I desperately want) is the only non-D or non-OL guy we should be looking at right now.
smark/net attack Advisory System Status is: Elevated (Holds; June 18, 2006) While the switch from Cena to RVD should alleviate some complaints, the inevitability of the belt's return to Cena (note where Summerslam is this year) and the poor initial showing by the new ECW are enough to keep the indicator where it is for now. The pieces are in place, though, especially on RAW, for improvements to be made to the IWC's psyche in the near future.
Obviously, I'm biased because the "Tuck Rule"-game turned out in my team's favor, but I didn't have a problem with the call or the rule because I'm all in favor of taking away judgment calls, and making it not offically a muffed punt until it...