The W
Views: 108496597
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Calendar | Color chart | Log in for more!
24.11.15 2016
The W - Pro Wrestling - Is the Homecoming spoiler a swerve?
This thread has 1 referral leading to it
Register and log in to post!
Thread rated: 3.27
Pages: 1
(5514 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
Post (2 total)

Since: 5.1.04
From: Reading, Pa

Since last post: 2930 days
Last activity: 2604 days
#1 Posted on | Instant Rating: 0.00
Some of you have probobly read that Matt Hardy is on the advertized card of future Smackdown house shows. Which makes the big match kind of anticlimatic.

This is either someone being sloppy and messing up kayfabe worse than WCW taping 3 months of TV in a single weekend, like they did in '93.

Or someone was smart enough to catch onto the fact that the net has used this kind of information before to predict the winner of matches and is shrewd enough to use it to swerve us in an angle that may have been a work from the start.

And that person is Matt Hardy, Version 2.00.

I just remembered that im absent minded
wait i mean i lost my mind, i cant find it.
Promote this thread!
DJ FrostyFreeze

Since: 2.1.02
From: Hawthorne, CA

Since last post: 2 days
Last activity: 6 hours
#2 Posted on | Instant Rating: 5.84

WWE has been "giving away" big match results by advertising future house show cards for a long time.

On a side note, I really dont think WWE works as hard to swerve internet fans as we think they do.

Thread rated: 3.27
Pages: 1
Thread ahead: Lance Storm speaks on trademarked names
Next thread: SmackDown/Velocity spoilers for 9-27-05
Previous thread: RAW 9/26/05
(5514 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
Did anyone else find it strange to have all the champions present on one show and none of their titles were on the line and only one of them won their match?
- blackdragon, RAW #938 5/16/11 (2011)
The W - Pro Wrestling - Is the Homecoming spoiler a swerve?Register and log in to post!

The W™ message board

©2001-2015 Brothers Zim

This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.994 seconds.