The W
Views: 97760533
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Calendar | Color chart | Log in for more!
28.7.14 1953
The W - the-w.com Site Feedback - Ignore by rating implemented (Page 2)
This thread has 4 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
Thread rated: 6.33
Pages: Prev 1 2 3 Next
(821 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (41 total)
Nag
Landjager








Since: 10.1.03
From: Enter your city here

Since last post: 2090 days
Last activity: 145 days
Y!:
#21 Posted on | Instant Rating: 3.49
Damn, what did I do to impact 3 people to ignore me. Lower then I thought to be honest.

I hate personally censoring people, even the dumbasses, cause you can learn from everyone. Yet, I've used that feature once, and only because the subject in question constantly posts irrelevant material to draw heat. Which, I did at one time, and turned everyone against me.
Bullitt
Shot in the dark








Since: 11.1.02
From: Houston

Since last post: 18 days
Last activity: 18 days
#22 Posted on | Instant Rating: 7.06
Aw, man...there's one person ignoring me? That's kind of upsetting...





This one's super lucky!
CRZ
Big Brother
Administrator








Since: 9.12.01
From: ミネアポリス

Since last post: 2 hours
Last activity: 2 hours
AIM:  
ICQ:  
Y!:
#23 Posted on | Instant Rating: 8.65
You all can stop telling us how many people are ignoring you, because everyone who's REALLY interested can look it up for themselves. Thanks

    Originally posted by EddieBurkett
      Originally posted by CRZ
      Your threshhold is compared against the "Instant Rating" contained in the post data


    So if someone gets rated a 0 as their first rating, and posts a bit, and then everyone likes what they say and everyone gives them 10's (even the original 0 is changed), for anyone with a threshold > 0, they will never see those posts that made everyone change the rating, they will only see the posts with the instant rating of 10. Correct?
Even the instant ratings within posts change...SOMETIMES.

Some things you were not meant to understand.



CRZ
Excalibur05
Knackwurst








Since: 19.1.02
From: Minnesota

Since last post: 5 days
Last activity: 2 hours
AIM:  
#24 Posted on | Instant Rating: 7.23
Geez, somebody's ignoring me. I didn't think that I posted here often enough to be worthy of an ignore. Plus, they can't read my column! Woe is they!



Wisconsin Badgers: 7-5 (Music City Bowl, eh? Oh well, I'll take it. A bowl is a bowl.)

Minnesota Vikings: 7-5 (Identical records! Honestly, I didn't see the blowout by the Rams, so I won't comment except to say: Ha Ha, Green Bay!)
Big G
Potato korv








Since: 21.8.03
From: the people who brought you Steel Magnolias....

Since last post: 8 days
Last activity: 16 hours
#25 Posted on | Instant Rating: 4.08
One concept to do with ratings part of an idea that I was planning on testing this year, but I don't have the time to set-up and administer a board at the moment (better to come here and mess up the Zims house)

My idea is thus:
Apply weighting to the ratings system. i.e. if someone rates you a zero, and they have a low personal rating themselves, it will have minimal impact on your personal rating. Conversely if they have a high rating, it will have a greater effect on your rating. The point of this is to lessen the effect of trolls that hand out zero's to people who tell them off. Where this can feed into is by altering users privileges based on rating, eg low ratings can't start new threads, etc. The thesis of my concept would be whether or not a message board could then 'self moderate'.

G

PS My thoughts are that it won't work (board self moderation) but I think the experiment would yield some interesting results.



Warrior Quote: "Presuming initial consensualness, where exactly do we draw the lines of our judgment pinning down the responsibility and accountability inextricably attached to each human life? "

Umm Indeed!
drjayphd
Scrapple
Moderator








Since: 22.4.02
From: Long Island

Since last post: 7 days
Last activity: 18 hours
AIM:  
ICQ:  
Y!:
#26 Posted on | Instant Rating: 7.17
How to Make the Wienerboard a Better Place, Chapter 1: Just because you can't spell "Heidenreich", doesn't make you clever.
Interesting concept, Big G, but it'd probably be a little too easy to manipulate. I mean, assuming this board hasn't changed the rating system from the stock one, they're already weighted by post count, so you get someone getting absolutely shit-hammered by people with nothing better to do than post and rate (although the post counts here are nowhere NEAR Mothership territory... the highest one there's somewhere over 30,000)... it wouldn't work out TOO well, but it's a start.



Today's Out-Of-Context Quote, Courtesy of Joseph Ryder:

"Sure, some guys here and there started fondling his balls, but it's nothing to get jealous over."
CRZ
Big Brother
Administrator








Since: 9.12.01
From: ミネアポリス

Since last post: 2 hours
Last activity: 2 hours
AIM:  
ICQ:  
Y!:
#27 Posted on | Instant Rating: 8.65
    Originally posted by drjayphd
    Interesting concept, Big G, but it'd probably be a little too easy to manipulate. I mean, assuming this board hasn't changed the rating system from the stock one
Assume nothing (kayfabe there, pal)



CRZ
BigDaddyLoco
Scrapple








Since: 2.1.02

Since last post: 10 hours
Last activity: 2 min.
#28 Posted on | Instant Rating: 4.60
I see no reason to vote anybody higher than what *YOU*, the Wienerboard audience, has rated me, the self centered sonofabitch.
Gugs
Bierwurst








Since: 9.7.02
From: Sleep (That's where I'm a viking)

Since last post: 431 days
Last activity: 23 days
AIM:  
Y!:
#29 Posted on | Instant Rating: 5.20
Giving it a test run, I've found that it doesn't block Weiners who haven't been rated. Just wanted to pass that along.



    Originally posted by ringmistress
    You may not believe this, but one year, I pretended I was a mistress (of the S&M variety). I was told I had the right voice for it. Just wanted to let you know that.


I love this place.
CRZ
Big Brother
Administrator








Since: 9.12.01
From: ミネアポリス

Since last post: 2 hours
Last activity: 2 hours
AIM:  
ICQ:  
Y!:
#30 Posted on | Instant Rating: 8.65
    Originally posted by gugs
    Giving it a test run, I've found that it doesn't block Weiners who haven't been rated. Just wanted to pass that along.
Then, you and others should rate them!

This is the correct function.



CRZ
Think of It As a Funnel
Cotto








Since: 22.9.03
From: Strongbadia

Since last post: 3862 days
Last activity: 3860 days
#31 Posted on | Instant Rating: 2.32
I find this feature pleasing.



oh
CRZ
Big Brother
Administrator








Since: 9.12.01
From: ミネアポリス

Since last post: 2 hours
Last activity: 2 hours
AIM:  
ICQ:  
Y!:
#32 Posted on | Instant Rating: 8.65
    Originally posted by Think of It As a Funnel
    I find this feature pleasing.
...because you're not using it? Confusing



CRZ
Think of It As a Funnel
Cotto








Since: 22.9.03
From: Strongbadia

Since last post: 3862 days
Last activity: 3860 days
#33 Posted on | Instant Rating: 2.31
Hey, I just hadn't gotten around to turning it on yet.



oh
Eddie Famous
Andouille








Since: 11.12.01
From: Catlin IL

Since last post: 247 days
Last activity: 241 days
#34 Posted on | Instant Rating: 5.25

1. Does this function work only for individual ratings? (Ex.: If I rated userX 3, and my limit was 4, would he be blocked?)

1a. If I rated userX 3, my limit is 4, and userX's overall rating is 5, would he be blocked?

2. If it IS based on overall rating, and userX's rating fluctuates from 3.9 to 4.1, and my limit is 4, will his posts disappear and reappear with the peaks and valleys?

Extra credit: Who recorded the song; "How Can The Labouring Man Find Time For Self Culture." No Cheating!





"In the sky. Lord, in the sky..."
Think of It As a Funnel
Cotto








Since: 22.9.03
From: Strongbadia

Since last post: 3862 days
Last activity: 3860 days
#35 Posted on | Instant Rating: 2.52
One minor problem. It seems as if one's own posts are subject to the ignore threshold.



oh
thecubsfan
Scrapple
Moderator








Since: 10.12.01
From: Aurora, IL

Since last post: 6 hours
Last activity: 35 min.
#36 Posted on | Instant Rating: 10.00
    Originally posted by Eddie Famous
    1. Does this function work only for individual ratings? (Ex.: If I rated userX 3, and my limit was 4, would he be blocked?)

    1a. If I rated userX 3, my limit is 4, and userX's overall rating is 5, would he be blocked?




    Originally posted by CRZ
    One more time: Your threshhold is compared against the "Instant Rating" contained in the post data, not your own personal rating of that person (unless you're the sole person to have rated that user, in which case they are equivalent)


    Originally posted by Eddie Famous
    2. If it IS based on overall rating, and userX's rating fluctuates from 3.9 to 4.1, and my limit is 4, will his posts disappear and reappear with the peaks and valleys?


    Originally posted by CRZ
    Your threshhold is compared against the "Instant Rating" contained in the post data


(So, yes.)


Spoiler Below: Highlight text to read
Martini Ranch - I admit looking it up, because obviously I'm one who believes in looking things up.




thecubsfan.com - CMLLBlog
CRZ
Big Brother
Administrator








Since: 9.12.01
From: ミネアポリス

Since last post: 2 hours
Last activity: 2 hours
AIM:  
ICQ:  
Y!:
#37 Posted on | Instant Rating: 8.65
    Originally posted by Think of It As a Funnel
    One minor problem. It seems as if one's own posts are subject to the ignore threshold.
That's a PROBLEM?

I mean, "hmmm. That could probably be fixed." :)



CRZ
Think of It As a Funnel
Cotto








Since: 22.9.03
From: Strongbadia

Since last post: 3862 days
Last activity: 3860 days
#38 Posted on | Instant Rating: 2.52
Considering the number and quality of my posts, it's not particularly a problem in my case, no. :)



oh
Excalibur05
Knackwurst








Since: 19.1.02
From: Minnesota

Since last post: 5 days
Last activity: 2 hours
AIM:  
#39 Posted on | Instant Rating: 7.22
    Originally posted by Think of It As a Funnel
    Considering the number and quality of my posts, it's not particularly a problem in my case, no. :)


Well, at least you're honest.



Wisconsin Badgers: 7-5 (Looks like we're playing Auburn. That's a color, not a school.)

Minnesota Vikings: 8-5 (I'm extending my giving thanks for one more week to say "Thank you, Seattle, for being an awful road team.")
StaggerLee
Scrapple








Since: 3.10.02
From: Right side of the tracks

Since last post: 5 hours
Last activity: 45 min.
AIM:  
Y!:
#40 Posted on | Instant Rating: 3.36
I think we should know who is ignoring us, just for the intrigue of it.
Pages: Prev 1 2 3 Next
Thread rated: 6.33
Pages: Prev 1 2 3 Next
Thread ahead: One more change
Next thread: Server down
Previous thread: Slow loading of ICQ blop??
(821 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
Thread08/07Total1363 new DVDs coming out 8/7/0799599552Playboy: Women of WWE75180673192 new DVDs coming out 8/21/0773973984By the power of Greyskull... He-Man Returns!
The W - the-w.com Site Feedback - Ignore by rating implemented (Page 2)Register and log in to post!

The W™ message board

ZimBoard
©2001-2014 Brothers Zim

This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.112 seconds.