Nah, can't have the grand WORLD title, then the piddly, meaningless WWF title. Whatever names they choose, you can bet they'll make the WWF title look SO much bigger and more important
There are no facts-only observational postulates in an endlessly regenerative hodgepodge of predictions. Consensus reality requires a fixed frame of reference. In a multilevel, infinite universe, there can be no fixity; thus, no absolute consensus reality. In a relativistic universe, it appears impossible to test the reliability of any expert by requiring him to agree with another expert. Both can be correct, each in his own inertial system.
Thats what i mean. What was the point of the World title? Like if they split it up id like to see them keep the wcw name just for tthe title. It carries history weather McMahon likes it or not. Its value in recent years has made it the joke it is.
You think we came out here, cuz its time for ropar room sucka?!?
I would bet that both Steve Austin and Stacy Keibler generate more revenue for the company than Rico. I would also bet that would still be true even if Rico was given significantly more TV time. (As far as Lawler, J.R.