The W
Views: 113684652
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Calendar | Color chart | Log in for more!
26.6.16 1246
The W - Pro Wrestling - Historical Question
This thread has 3 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
Thread rated: 3.92
Pages: 1
(3527 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (3 total)
redsoxnation
Scrapple








Since: 24.7.02

Since last post: 1091 days
Last activity: 1091 days
#1 Posted on | Instant Rating: 5.05
Along the lines 10 years ago of the argument of some over what year was the new millennium, 2000 or 2001, what is the wrestling philosophy over what year a decade ends, the 9 year or the 0 year? If it is the 0 year, an interesting scenario could develop in the year 2011. Both Undertaker and Sting won their first world championship in 1990, which could be determined to have been the conclusion of a decade. That would mean that there could be a competition between the 2 to become only the second wrestler (Lou Thesz being the other) to win a world championship in 4 separate decades. If it is marketable, I'm sure the promoters will consider the 0 to end the decade.
Promote this thread!
FLRockAndLaw
Kishke








Since: 2.1.02
From: Central Florida, somewhere between Orlando and Tampa, U.S.A.

Since last post: 147 days
Last activity: 3 days
#2 Posted on | Instant Rating: 1.65
Here are some more thoughts from a demented mind in Central Florida:
I hate to rain on your parade, because it's an interesting point you pose. However, last I checked, 'Taker didn't win a world title until winning the WWF World Title from Hulk Hogan at Survivor Series in 1991. Are you counting his USWA Unified World Heavyweight Championship reign? (I'm ass/u/m(e)-ing not, since that happened in '89, and you referred to his first world championship as being in '90.)

Sting, however, might just qualify. But I don't know if he has enough gas left in the tank to pull it off.



Why yes, I am both a musician and a lawyer. Thanks for asking. :)
redsoxnation
Scrapple








Since: 24.7.02

Since last post: 1091 days
Last activity: 1091 days
#3 Posted on | Instant Rating: 5.05
I blame senility on this one. After a while it all starts to blend together and I convinced myself Taker won in '90 instead of '91.
Thread rated: 3.92
Pages: 1
Thread ahead: RAW #828 4/6/09
Next thread: ECW #148 04/07/09
Previous thread: Ring of Honor on HDNet #3 4.4.09
(3527 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
Seth must have BOOKED it up the side of that cage, I think he was on top of it before they were done showing the replay of him randomly attacking Orton. Speaking of, it looks like Orton is turning face or, at least, psycho tweener.
- Blind_Guardian, WWE RAW #1117 10/20/14 (2014)
The W - Pro Wrestling - Historical QuestionRegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board

ZimBoard
©2001-2016 Brothers Zim

This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.393 seconds.