The W
June 7, 2009 - birthdaybritney.jpg
Views: 178998621
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Calendar | Color chart | Log in for more!
28.3.24 0727
The W - Pro Wrestling - Historical Question
This thread has 3 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
Thread rated: 3.92
Pages: 1
(4378 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (3 total)
redsoxnation
Scrapple








Since: 24.7.02

Since last post: 3923 days
Last activity: 3923 days
#1 Posted on | Instant Rating: 5.05
Along the lines 10 years ago of the argument of some over what year was the new millennium, 2000 or 2001, what is the wrestling philosophy over what year a decade ends, the 9 year or the 0 year? If it is the 0 year, an interesting scenario could develop in the year 2011. Both Undertaker and Sting won their first world championship in 1990, which could be determined to have been the conclusion of a decade. That would mean that there could be a competition between the 2 to become only the second wrestler (Lou Thesz being the other) to win a world championship in 4 separate decades. If it is marketable, I'm sure the promoters will consider the 0 to end the decade.
Promote this thread!
FLRockAndLaw
Kishke








Since: 2.1.02
From: Central Florida, somewhere between Orlando and Tampa, U.S.A.

Since last post: 2979 days
Last activity: 2294 days
#2 Posted on | Instant Rating: 1.65
Here are some more thoughts from a demented mind in Central Florida:
I hate to rain on your parade, because it's an interesting point you pose. However, last I checked, 'Taker didn't win a world title until winning the WWF World Title from Hulk Hogan at Survivor Series in 1991. Are you counting his USWA Unified World Heavyweight Championship reign? (I'm ass/u/m(e)-ing not, since that happened in '89, and you referred to his first world championship as being in '90.)

Sting, however, might just qualify. But I don't know if he has enough gas left in the tank to pull it off.



Why yes, I am both a musician and a lawyer. Thanks for asking. :)
redsoxnation
Scrapple








Since: 24.7.02

Since last post: 3923 days
Last activity: 3923 days
#3 Posted on | Instant Rating: 5.05
I blame senility on this one. After a while it all starts to blend together and I convinced myself Taker won in '90 instead of '91.
Thread rated: 3.92
Pages: 1
Thread ahead: RAW #828 4/6/09
Next thread: ECW #148 04/07/09
Previous thread: Ring of Honor on HDNet #3 4.4.09
(4378 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
I usually look at 411 Wrestling, but I've seen some people say there are much better. I like the list of headlines presentation. I used to like Wrestleboard and Scoops alot, what happened to them? What happened to Al Isaccs (The man they call Al)?
The W - Pro Wrestling - Historical QuestionRegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board

ZimBoard
©2001-2024 Brothers Zim

This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.324 seconds.