The W
Views: 95569096
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Calendar | Color chart | Log in for more!
17.4.14 0734
The W - Pro Wrestling - HHH title defences
This thread has 12 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
Pages: 1(13027 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (10 total)
HarleM HeAt
Pickled pork








Since: 23.3.02
From: Nova Scotia,Canada

Since last post: 3575 days
Last activity: 3381 days
ICQ:  
#1 Posted on
So the leader of the new era, Triple H new belt and all, the only man eligiable on both shows has been defending the title agaist all comers from both brands. Negative. So far he has head one title defense and ending the match by pinning title threat Stephanie. I mean i heard the guy is hurt and there my not be a need for him on raw with him feuding with hogan but he is THE UNDISPUTED CHAMPION. I mean i would like t have the champion fighting challenger after challenger ala Bret hart in his first title riegn, defending agaist everyone. Even Virgil. I enjoyed raw last night quite a lot but still. Im sure Jercho wouldnt
mind defending the belt every show in 20 minute classics.

i need some actual wrestling here and taker-rvd was a good start
the best match last year in my opinon was benoit-austin form smackdown where chrisd gave him the ten german suplexs. the main events must be more like that/
i just had to get all this off my chest. phewww.



Once the match started the giant looked high and low, but he couldnt find Shane.Which Way did GO?
Promote this thread!
Big John DUD!
Linguica








Since: 25.3.02

Since last post: 4263 days
Last activity: 4263 days
#2 Posted on
I think this has something to do with the fact the WWF wanting to have less title defences on free TV.


OR


Or HHH is a lazy muniputive Bastard.


The choice is yours.
dMp
Banger








Since: 4.1.02
From: The Hague, Netherlands (Europe)

Since last post: 18 hours
Last activity: 18 hours
#3 Posted on
If he was booked to defend the title I am sure he would.
They will probably spend alot of time on SD building the Hogan-HHH feud, but I am not sure if it will be via a match.
Maybe in the week before Backlash it will come to a fight, but not any sooner.

Which isn't a bad thing if they do it right.
And btw, why would H show up on Raw? The contender is on Smackdown and he doesn't care about what goes on on the other show now..



"...And I use that to fuck them some place fairly uncomfortable."
"What, like the back of a volkswagen ?"
-Mallrats
Qubber
Boerewors








Since: 7.1.02
From: Sheffield, UK

Since last post: 2561 days
Last activity: 1824 days
AIM:  
#4 Posted on | Instant Rating: 8.00
I don't think it's a bad thing at all that the title is held back for PPV. There's been a group of people clamouring for more importance to be placed on the Undisputed title (you know instead of having it as a meaningless prop in a divorce storyline) and if the belt is defended less, it is therefore more important when it is put on the line, and whats more, being number one contender and getting a title shot is more important as title shots are rarer. If the title is defended less it would elevate the title and the number one contendership to mean so much more, especially if your part of the WWF only gets a number one contender once every two months. I've got no problem with that scenario at all. The title matches on free TV rarely resulted in title changes (or credible challengers half the time) anyway.



"Nobody enjoys a good time more than I do, but this business of yours is as legitimate as a three-legged donkey...which of course is illegitimate because as we all know donkeys have four legs."

Lance Storm, 21st January 2002.
HarleM HeAt
Pickled pork








Since: 23.3.02
From: Nova Scotia,Canada

Since last post: 3575 days
Last activity: 3381 days
ICQ:  
#5 Posted on
sorry i disagree. I say the champion should be defending the title. What would be the point as to having him on both shows unless he was defending what he has worked so hard to get. i dont think having less title defences make the title stronger. It makes it weaker. Example: People sya the wcw title lost credability cause of Arquette winning it but i say it did when hoagan one it first. He literly did not defend the title form superbrawl in feb against vader until bash at the beach against vader. 4 months with out a title defence. it was degrading. The belt will mean more if you have meaningful matches along with your current feud. Not defending the title lessens its value form where im seeing things. Anyone out there agree?



Once the match started the giant looked high and low, but he couldnt find Shane.Which Way did GO?
spf
Scrapple








Since: 2.1.02
From: The Las Vegas of Canada

Since last post: 5 days
Last activity: 15 hours
AIM:  
#6 Posted on
Heat: I agree that what Hogan and WCW did was atrocious. However, I do think less defenses of the title, and more angles of people working for their shot at it would make sense. I'd like to see the champion make one defense per month on each show, plus the PPV defense. The rest of the time should be about people working their asses off and fighting for a crack at this holy grail. Only those who win and succeed should be going for the title, and those who are getting shots at it should be consumed by it as if their lives depended on it. Not only are those angles much more effective IMHO, they're also simpler and easier for the crack-addled monkeys writing WWF tv to try and wrap themselves around than getting laughs from dog shit and hand lotion jokes.



"You used it to shove your miserable daughter down our throats week in and week out...not anymore!" - Ric Flair gives me hope, Raw 3/18/02

"I thought it was cool how HHH just tossed Jericho out of the ring and made him vanish, possibly into another dimension, at the end of the match." - Dr. Unlikely says the funniest thing I've ever read on Wienerville.

twoelitistsnobs, filling all your bitter pop culture reviewing needs
Notorious F.A.B.
Pepperoni








Since: 4.2.02
From: Dudleyville's Gay Ghetto

Since last post: 3837 days
Last activity: 3823 days
AIM:  
#7 Posted on

    Originally posted by HarleM HeAt
    Im sure Jercho wouldnt mind defending the belt every show in 20 minute classics.


a twenty minute world title defense twice a week would not be a good thing. there are very, very few workers out there - if any - who could sustain that for more than two weeks without becoming horribly repetitive. jericho certainly isn't in that class, internet darling or no.

as for triple h not defending, it's been four weeks since he won the title and we haven't even gotten to another ppv yet. the federation is only two weeks removed from the split and all that entails. chill. i'd rather they have their ducks in a row before they start throwing title shots around willy nilly and introduce a whole bunch continuity errors.



It's just you against the group mind.
I like weiners.
Travis
Boerewors








Since: 7.3.02
From: Baltimore, MD

Since last post: 4349 days
Last activity: 4285 days
AIM:  
ICQ:  
#8 Posted on
If this was WCW, wouldn't the H be stripped of the title by now?

Besides, you wouldn't wanna cheapen the title and the champ by having them defend against some loser like Maven...ERRRRR...



Even lesbians want me.
Randomwrestling:We know to leave the Paintbrush alone.
bubblesthechimp
Boudin rouge








Since: 22.3.02
From: Weymouth, Ma

Since last post: 16 days
Last activity: 1 day
#9 Posted on

    Originally posted by Big John DUD!
    I think this has something to do with the fact the WWF wanting to have less title defences on free TV.


    OR


    Or HHH is a lazy muniputive Bastard.


    The choice is yours.



Or maybe theyre giving HHH's knee time to heal a little bit.



HUH?
Net Hack Slasher
Banger








Since: 6.1.02
From: Outer reaches of your mind

Since last post: 3400 days
Last activity: 1820 days
#10 Posted on
No title defenses, after injury worried about more about style (muscles)then substance(in ring)


Is it me or Triple H is becoming more and more like Hulk Hogan every day... Well except for the popularity.

(edited by Net Hack Slasher on 11.4.02 1741)
Pages: 1Thread ahead: WWF.COM's SMACKDOWN! Spoilers
Next thread: Active Title Holders
Previous thread: UnderTaker gets scrapped off WWF Title Again!
(13027 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
Another thing that popped into my mind about Raven going after the title. I heard elswhere some opinions that maybe NWA is waiting too long to put the belt on Raven, and they won't ever be as interested as last night.
- FMW, Thoughts on TNA (2003)
The W - Pro Wrestling - HHH title defencesRegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board

ZimBoard
©2001-2014 Brothers Zim

This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.448 seconds.