The W
Views: 121246290
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Calendar | Color chart | Log in for more!
26.2.17 0850
The W - Pro Wrestling - Has the JBL era really lasted this long? (Page 2)
This thread has 12 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
Thread rated: 3.91
Pages: Prev 1 2
(6532 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (22 total)
darkmatcher
Bockwurst








Since: 12.2.03
From: New York, USA

Since last post: 3533 days
Last activity: 2608 days
#21 Posted on | Instant Rating: 3.10
Fine, I guess I'm wrong.
CHAPLOW
Morcilla








Since: 14.5.04
From: right behind you

Since last post: 985 days
Last activity: 222 days
#22 Posted on | Instant Rating: 1.29
    Originally posted by Grimis
    I distinctly remember people complaining about titles being switched around so much. So...now that somebody has held the title for a long time, what's the problem?


That the person that finally did it sucks, but hey,
no big deal.



Now for a...
GREAT MOMENT IN TV VIEWING HISTORY

Amy Webber (on Smackdown): "You think everything is about you, Joy! Do you think you're special?"

My Little Cousin at home: "is she wearing a princess tiarra?"
Pages: Prev 1 2
Thread rated: 3.91
Pages: Prev 1 2
Thread ahead: WSJ article: Wrestle Reunion
Next thread: Thanks, but can I wait till next year?
Previous thread: WWE and NOAH Meeting
(6532 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
Because that's how it is. WWE hyped the hell out of this stupid angle, and had the wrestlers doing radio, tv, newspaper tours. And GLAAD feels betrayed b/c they gave them a gravy boat. GLAAD now feels like a "dirty birdy" for promoting them....
- The Vile1, Mushnick's At It Again (2002)
Related threads: WWE 2005 PPV Schedule - Austin announcement - New Jack in WWE? - More...
The W - Pro Wrestling - Has the JBL era really lasted this long? (Page 2)Register and log in to post!

The W™ message board

ZimBoard
©2001-2017 Brothers Zim

This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.525 seconds.