The W
Views: 106740117
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Calendar | Color chart | Log in for more!
30.8.15 1516
The W - Pro Wrestling - Great Von Erich article (no link)
This thread has 11 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
Thread rated: 4.04
Pages: 1
(5485 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (2 total)
jivesoulbro
Bauerwurst








Since: 25.12.02

Since last post: 2736 days
Last activity: 762 days
#1 Posted on | Instant Rating: 3.33
If you live in Texas, I highly suggest picking up the upcoming issue of Texas Monthly magazine if you were ever a Von Erich fan. My local Barnes and Noble had a copy on the racks today, though I think it doesn't come out in most places until next week, and there is a very good story about the Von Erichs. I think you will particularly like it if, like me, part of what got you hooked on this business was watching World Class in the eighties.

Apologies for the provincial nature of this post. And no, I don't work for the magazine. Just glad to see wrestling treated with some respect in a very well-respected publication.

(edited by jivesoulbro on 17.9.05 2125)
Promote this thread!
Deacon Jim
Chipolata








Since: 11.12.03
From: Dallas, TX

Since last post: 1025 days
Last activity: 30 min.
AIM:  
Y!:
#2 Posted on | Instant Rating: 4.76
Thank you very much.
Thread rated: 4.04
Pages: 1
Thread ahead: WWE should be ashamed of themselves
Next thread: YOUR BELOVED SMACKDOWN COMIX for 9/16/2005!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Previous thread: Brock Lesnar's New Japan Debut Match Officially Set
(5485 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
I was trying to figure out how exactly Bischoff could lose in that situation, and I think you just found it. Here's hoping that it's just a silly bit of fantasy booking and not the actual truth. Please. Damn, could they be any more predictable?
- ILikeJeffGaylord, Gotta love Bischoff's stipulations... (2002)
The W - Pro Wrestling - Great Von Erich article (no link)Register and log in to post!

The W™ message board

ZimBoard
©2001-2015 Brothers Zim

This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 1.233 seconds.