The W
Views: 98342192
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Calendar | Color chart | Log in for more!
21.8.14 2315
The W - Baseball - Goodbye, Montreal Expos. Hello, Washington Nationals.
This thread has 441 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
Thread rated: 5.29
Pages: 1
(872 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (13 total)
Kawshen
Liverwurst








Since: 2.1.02
From: Bronx, NY

Since last post: 1896 days
Last activity: 156 days
AIM:  
#1 Posted on | Instant Rating: 5.16
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=1916908

Sources told the Times that Nationals is a near lock, ahead of Grays, historical name of the Negro League team in Washington, and Senators, following a process that involved focus groups, marketing executives and polling data.

The team logo and uniform designs also are nearing completion, sources told the Times. Team colors will be red, white and blue, of course, although there's no indication which will be the primary color.

The clear aim is to put caps, shirts and other merchandise on sale for holiday shopping, which begins in less than three weeks.

-----------------------

This only works if they rename one of the AL Teams the Americans - even though that's technically the same meaning as 'Yankees' :)




Promote this thread!
BigSteve
Pepperoni








Since: 23.7.04
From: Baltimore, MD

Since last post: 2779 days
Last activity: 2507 days
#2 Posted on | Instant Rating: 2.32
Nationals....eh I don't like it. I don't think that Senators is really great either, but at least it has the historical significance to go with it. They ought to be pretty cool looking with the red, white, and blue though.
Whitebacon
Boudin blanc








Since: 12.1.02
From: Fresno, CA

Since last post: 5 days
Last activity: 4 hours
AIM:  
ICQ:  
#3 Posted on | Instant Rating: 7.04
The problem with the Senators name is that the rights are still owned by the Rangers.

Don't go buying your National's merchandise just yet though:
DC Council RFK plan could derail move. (sports.espn.go.com)



bash91
Merguez








Since: 2.1.02
From: Plain Dealing, LA

Since last post: 736 days
Last activity: 6 hours
#4 Posted on | Instant Rating: 7.10
Personally, I'm convinced that there's something in the air causing mass insanity when I find myself agreeing with Marion Freaking Barry about anything but, GO MARION.

Tim



People who say they don't "play politics" merely play politics badly. -- David Drake
estragand
Summer sausage








Since: 18.6.02

Since last post: 2493 days
Last activity: 2493 days
AIM:  
#5 Posted on | Instant Rating: 8.00
    Originally posted by BigSteve
    Nationals....eh I don't like it. I don't think that Senators is really great either, but at least it has the historical significance to go with it. They ought to be pretty cool looking with the red, white, and blue though.

I believe that the original Senators were once known as the "Nationals" prior to 1957 or so. So there's some history there, as well. I've never been able to figure out an exact date for the name change.

As far as franchise records go... will Expos records carry over into the new Nationals, or will they start fresh? (Similar to the Cleveland Browns/Baltimore Ravens switch, where they started over). Original Senators records are part of Twins history, and 60's/70's Senators records are now part of the Rangers.



-ES
Visit ES online- it's "Internet Entertainment"!
Sec19Row53
Lap cheong








Since: 2.1.02
From: Oconomowoc, WI

Since last post: 20 days
Last activity: 2 hours
Y!:
#6 Posted on | Instant Rating: 7.23
Since there won't be another Expos franchise, I have to believe that the Expos records will apply to the Nationals.

From what I've read elsewhere, the first incarnation of the Nationals officially became the Senators in 1955 or 56, although they were informally and popularly known as the Senators long before that.



[It's where I sit]
Grimis
Scrapple








Since: 11.7.02
From: MD

Since last post: 1207 days
Last activity: 1004 days
#7 Posted on | Instant Rating: 7.29
And remember, they could still be the Virginia Nationals before the end of this...



BigSteve
Pepperoni








Since: 23.7.04
From: Baltimore, MD

Since last post: 2779 days
Last activity: 2507 days
#8 Posted on | Instant Rating: 2.12
Baseball-reference.com doesn't list the Twins as ever being the Washington Nationals. It says Washington Senators from 1901 to 1960. So I guess that is incorrect, and I have nothing to add to that part of the discussion.

Anyway, as for the records, I think they wouldbe new records. My take on it is, anytime a team changes city AND nickname (Montreal Expos to Washington Nationals), they are a 'new' team. If the team only changes one or the other (St Louis Cardinals to Phoenix Cardinals or Washington Bullets to Washington Wizards), I would view it as the same franchise and records.
Grimis
Scrapple








Since: 11.7.02
From: MD

Since last post: 1207 days
Last activity: 1004 days
#9 Posted on | Instant Rating: 7.29
    Originally posted by BigSteve
    Baseball-reference.com doesn't list the Twins as ever being the Washington Nationals. It says Washington Senators from 1901 to 1960. So I guess that is incorrect, and I have nothing to add to that part of the discussion.
They were both, technically. You can see that tby these 1905 uniforms...



It wasn't until 1959 that they put Senators on their uniforms...



Zeruel
Thirty Millionth Hit
Moderator








Since: 2.1.02
From: The Silver Spring in the Land of Mary.

Since last post: 2 days
Last activity: 5 hours
#10 Posted on | Instant Rating: 4.05
    Originally posted by Grimis
    And remember, they could still be the Virginia Nationals before the end of this...


When the DC City Council fucks this up and MLB moves them to Arlington or Alexandria, they will probably still be known as the DC team, just the stadium. (See: Landover Redskins and the Cap Centre Bullets/Capitals)




The Catastrophic Annihilation War Room
And now, for a limited time only, it rhymes with "door hinge!"

Grimis
Scrapple








Since: 11.7.02
From: MD

Since last post: 1207 days
Last activity: 1004 days
#11 Posted on | Instant Rating: 7.29
    Originally posted by Zeruel
    When the DC City Council fucks this up and MLB moves them to Arlington or Alexandria, they will probably still be known as the DC team, just the stadium. (See: Landover Redskins and the Cap Centre Bullets/Capitals)
I think that depends on ownership. If the Collins group buys the team, and the stadium gets built in Fairfax County, then they will be the Virginia Nationals/Fury/Whatever...



Zeruel
Thirty Millionth Hit
Moderator








Since: 2.1.02
From: The Silver Spring in the Land of Mary.

Since last post: 2 days
Last activity: 5 hours
#12 Posted on | Instant Rating: 4.05
Maybe it's because I'm too "close" to the situation, but "The Virginia _____" just sounds small market to me. I don't know why.




The Catastrophic Annihilation War Room
And now, for a limited time only, it rhymes with "door hinge!"

Whitebacon
Boudin blanc








Since: 12.1.02
From: Fresno, CA

Since last post: 5 days
Last activity: 4 hours
AIM:  
ICQ:  
#13 Posted on | Instant Rating: 7.04
I don't think its because your close to the situation, it sounds small-market to me as well, and I'm pretty far away.

The Virginia Fury sounds like a WNBA/MLS reject.



Thread rated: 5.29
Pages: 1
Thread ahead: Jason Bay NL Rookie of the Year
Next thread: This Year's Free Agents
Previous thread: Well, At Least He's Undefeated...
(872 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
I am shocked and absolutely pissed about this. As good as we've been doing lately, as positive as the locker room has been, we should have given Riggleman an extension, goddammit.
- ekedolphin, Jim Riggleman Resigns (2011)
The W - Baseball - Goodbye, Montreal Expos. Hello, Washington Nationals.Register and log in to post!

The W™ message board

ZimBoard
©2001-2014 Brothers Zim

This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.103 seconds.