The W
WrestleMania 33 begins in 632,703 seconds
Views: 121918515
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Calendar | Color chart | Log in for more!
26.3.17 1014
The W - Site Bashing - Gay/sexist internet snob hack
This thread has 9 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
Pages: 1(522 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (13 total)
Net Hack Slasher
Banger








Since: 6.1.02
From: Outer reaches of your mind

Since last post: 4474 days
Last activity: 2894 days
#1 Posted on
I think I found the most gayest/sexist Interent hack snob out there... It's Canadian slam "columnist" John Molinaro.

In his prediction thread for WMX8 on the womens match he wrote "who cares"(like he always does)
Click Here - for proof on picks


and on the review of the match gave it a 1/10... but gave tag match a 5/10
Click Here - for proof on review


What bothers me is that I found the build to the women match more interesting then some of the men stuff, but he goes who cares like it's beneth him, What an asshole. I understand if its a gimmick match, but a real match and he feels it's beneth his hackness to even comment on it.

Then giving it 1 out of 10, a 1 would mean there was NO EFFORT. You could tell Trish was trying hard, all were, I think the match was better then the Tag match and might be better then Christian/DDP

I could you take any person review when his preview is complete "who cares" for that match.

If a womens match sucks like Chyna vs. anyone then fine rip it but if the effort is there like it was on Sunday give it some respect.
Promote this thread!
TheBucsFan
TheChiefsFan








Since: 2.1.02

Since last post: 957 days
Last activity: 957 days
#2 Posted on | Instant Rating: 4.42
most gayest?



Caring is the first step towards disappointment.
Jaguar
Knackwurst








Since: 23.1.02
From: In a Blue State finally

Since last post: 52 days
Last activity: 31 days
#3 Posted on
Hey BucsFan, not to rag on you or anything, but I hate it when people make comments like that. I know that I do it too sometimes, but it really takes away from the statement that was written above your potshot. So, anyway, try not devalue other people's words because they didn't make sense all the way through and/or punctuate/spell correctly.

-Jag

Of course, I do have to admit, calling someone "Gay" is really one of the lamest insults out there. C'mon people, be creative!
Elitist
Bauerwurst








Since: 3.1.02
From: USA, USA

Since last post: 5029 days
Last activity: 3373 days
#4 Posted on
Yes. In the future, please use the more politically correct phrase "least heterosexual".

Thank you.



Elitist - All the Way Live

We're gonna play some pool, skip some school, act real cool
Stay out all night, it's gonna feel all right...
Rudy
Polska kielbasa








Since: 3.1.02

Since last post: 5266 days
Last activity: 5256 days
#5 Posted on
<< Yes. In the future, please use the more politically correct phrase "least heterosexual". >>

Or in this case, "Leastest Heterosexual".

later, Rudy

TheBucsFan
TheChiefsFan








Since: 2.1.02

Since last post: 957 days
Last activity: 957 days
#6 Posted on | Instant Rating: 4.42

    Originally posted by Jaguar
    Hey BucsFan, not to rag on you or anything, but I hate it when people make comments like that. I know that I do it too sometimes, but it really takes away from the statement that was written above your potshot. So, anyway, try not devalue other people's words because they didn't make sense all the way through and/or punctuate/spell correctly.

    -Jag

    Of course, I do have to admit, calling someone "Gay" is really one of the lamest insults out there. C'mon people, be creative!



I just didn't find much else about the post worth responding to. I tend to ignore those who call others "gay" as an insult.



Caring is the first step towards disappointment.
BigDaddyLoco
Scrapple








Since: 2.1.02

Since last post: 2 days
Last activity: 1 hour
#7 Posted on

    I just didn't find much else about the post worth responding to. I tend to ignore those who call others "gay" as an insult.


Then why bother responding at all?
CRZ
Big Brother
Administrator








Since: 9.12.01
From: ミネアポリス

Since last post: 1 day
Last activity: 1 day
AIM:  
ICQ:  
#8 Posted on

    Originally posted by BigDaddyLoco

      I just didn't find much else about the post worth responding to. I tend to ignore those who call others "gay" as an insult.


    Then why bother responding at all?

Oh, *I* get it - you're being ironical!!

This whole thread has turned kinda gay, I've noticed. (oops)



CRZ
Visit [slash] wrestling
CRZ
Big Brother
Administrator








Since: 9.12.01
From: ミネアポリス

Since last post: 1 day
Last activity: 1 day
AIM:  
ICQ:  
#9 Posted on
I just deleted a pointless followup.

I realise it's hopelessly optimistic of me to think that some of you will be able to restrain yourselves, but I REALLY hate having to close threads.



CRZ
Visit [slash] wrestling
Net Hack Slasher
Banger








Since: 6.1.02
From: Outer reaches of your mind

Since last post: 4474 days
Last activity: 2894 days
#10 Posted on
Jeesh I thought this board was a little less snobby then this.

I went through the trouble of not just posting this up but actual links to this guy who seems to just want to diss the females in the Fed, I should have stuck with sexist probabley. But you guys took and and spun it without even looking at the rest of my topic.

I guess this place is a little too inside for me.
Guru Zim
SQL Dejection
Administrator








Since: 9.12.01
From: Bay City, OR

Since last post: 12 days
Last activity: 4 days
AIM:  
ICQ:  
#11 Posted on
Since you are admitting you would have gotten a different response had you worded it differently, doesn't that pretty much clinch it that you had poor word selection?

I'd give examples of how bad word choice can immediately discredit an argument, but you seem to understand. I don't want to turn this into a flame.

Next time be a little more careful in how you phrase your argument and I bet you will be pleased with the results. The board isn't snobby - you would probably get the same reaction most places.



I love it when a plan comes together
Jaguar
Knackwurst








Since: 23.1.02
From: In a Blue State finally

Since last post: 52 days
Last activity: 31 days
#12 Posted on
Well just to add a piece that I should've said earlier but didn't is this: I contributed to this by talking about Bucs' reply instead of the actual post, pretty much assuring that nobody would respond to the actual reason this thread is in existence. Sorry, my bad. The only way I can explain it is because I had no desire to read the sexist writer just so I could comment on how sexist he was.

Ahhh, I'm just talking for no reason again, aren't I?

-Jag

Probably. Damn.
who__lame
Tocino








Since: 23.1.02

Since last post: 5052 days
Last activity: 5032 days
#13 Posted on

    Originally posted by CRZ

      Originally posted by BigDaddyLoco

        I just didn't find much else about the post worth responding to. I tend to ignore those who call others "gay" as an insult.


      Then why bother responding at all?

    Oh, *I* get it - you're being ironical!!

    This whole thread has turned kinda gay, I've noticed. (oops)



Can we say romo? Pretty Please? ;-)
Pages: 1Thread ahead: Are we the worst?
Next thread: wwf.com
Previous thread: More 1Bob overkill
(522 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
Wasn't that the latest Hot Newz headline?
- byort, The Torch got me... (2003)
The W - Site Bashing - Gay/sexist internet snob hackRegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board

ZimBoard
©2001-2017 Brothers Zim

This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.117 seconds.