The W
Views: 95701252
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Calendar | Color chart | Log in for more!
20.4.14 2133
The W - Football - Fran Tarkenton on Brett Favre
This thread has 7 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
Thread rated: 3.57
Pages: 1
(693 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (6 total)
MisterHenderson
Boerewors








Since: 3.5.06
From: New York

Since last post: 1645 days
Last activity: 1563 days
#1 Posted on | Instant Rating: 1.29
Click Here (sports.yahoo.com)

Zeruel's edit: The long link broke the tables, so I edited it.
____________________________________________________________
I'm sure there are a lot of Vikings fans out there who would love to see Brett Favre put on the purple and yellow, but Fran Tarkenton isn't one of them. If it does eventually happen, you won't see Tarkenton showing up at Favre's door in Minnesota with a freshly-baked apple pie to welcome him.

Tarkenton was on 790 the Zone in Atlanta yesterday and talked about the Brett Favre's "I'm retired, wait, no I'm not" bit.

“I think it’s despicable. What he put the Packers through last year was not good. Here’s an organization that was loyal to him for 17, 18 years, provided stability of organization, provided players. It just wasn’t about Brett Favre. In this day and time, we have glorified the Brett Favre’s of the world so much, they think it’s about them. He goes to New York and bombs. He’s 39 years old. How would you like Ray Nitschke in his last year (playing for) the Vikings, or I retire, and go play for the Packers. I kind of hope it happens, so he can fail.”
____________________________________________________________

The one thing that strikes me funny is, didn't Fran Tarkenton force a trade out of Minnesota in 1966? What's the difference between that and what Brett did with Green Bay?


(edited by Zeruel on 28.5.09 2221)

(edited by Zeruel on 28.5.09 2222)

Hey Ferb...I know what we're gonna do today!
Promote this thread!
StaggerLee
Scrapple








Since: 3.10.02
From: Right side of the tracks

Since last post: 3 days
Last activity: 2 hours
AIM:  
Y!:
#2 Posted on | Instant Rating: 2.88
Didn't Tark "go to new york and failed" too?
djp
Morcilla








Since: 16.2.07
From: 3rd Floor, NW window

Since last post: 14 days
Last activity: 4 days
#3 Posted on | Instant Rating: 4.23
I believe that Tarkenton requested a trade from Minnesota primarily due to differences with the head coach. He was only in the league a few years at that time, so it really had nothing to do with misleading them or quasi-retiring. So there are similarities between the two situations in that regard but Fran leaving was not the same situation as he clearly stated his desire to play for another team, whereas Favre put the Packers in a much more difficult situation.

He went to the Giants and had moderate success before being traded back to Minnesota a few years later.
The Thrill
Banger








Since: 16.4.02
From: Green Bay, WI

Since last post: 4 days
Last activity: 4 days
#4 Posted on | Instant Rating: 4.25
Godspeed, men of the 2nd Bn, 127th Infantry, 32d "Red Arrow" Brigade, Wisconsin Army National Guard! Victory in Iraq!

Interesting Rasmussen poll:

42% of Minnesotans against Favre as their QB.
29% in favor.

And 44% of those polled say if the Vikes sign Favre, they won't support public financing for a new football stadium for the Vikes.

Hmmm...










NWAWisconsin.com...Live, Local Pro Wrestling!

redsoxnation
Scrapple








Since: 24.7.02

Since last post: 293 days
Last activity: 293 days
#5 Posted on | Instant Rating: 4.81
In the current financial environment, I doubt public financing for a stadium gets voter approval if put on a ballot for a long time to come.

(edited by redsoxnation on 30.5.09 1958)
Mr. Boffo
Scrapple








Since: 24.3.02
From: Oshkosh, WI

Since last post: 266 days
Last activity: 226 days
#6 Posted on | Instant Rating: 5.24
Yeah that's the real key. 44% say signing Favre would make them less likely to support public financing, but 88% of all respondents were against public support with or without Favre. So at worst, signing Favre takes support for public funding from 12% down to 8% (12% * 63%; 44% say they're less likely to support financing, but 7% say they're more likely to support financing). And we have no idea how much of that is posturing by Vikings fans. Believe me, I saw first hand when people had to choose between liking Brett Favre and liking the Packers; most of the ones I saw choose the Packers. Hating Favre and liking the Vikings might work the same way.

Interestingly, low-income voters are less likely to support public funding, and are also the ones who say they will be even less likely to support it if Favre is signed.
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/states_general/minnesota/only_29_in_minnesota_say_vikings_should_sign_brett_favre
Thread rated: 3.57
Pages: 1
Thread ahead: Favre reportedly already signed with Vikings
Next thread: Donte Stallworth gets sentenced...WTF???
Previous thread: Jeremy Shockey rushed to hospital
(693 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
As a Wisconsin football fan, I'd like to see how Bollinger does in a starting roll.
Related threads: 2009 NFL schedule's out! - Kickoff Weekend and Thanksgiving Games Announced - Slow News Day - More...
The W - Football - Fran Tarkenton on Brett Favre Register and log in to post!

The W™ message board

ZimBoard
©2001-2014 Brothers Zim

This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.103 seconds.