The W
Views: 98547104
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Calendar | Color chart | Log in for more!
30.8.14 1537
The W - Pro Wrestling - Foley = Ratings Register and log in to post!
Pages: 1(8778 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (7 total)
tasslex
Salami








Since: 15.10.02
From: Eagan, MN

Since last post: 3610 days
Last activity: 3567 days
#1 Posted on
From 1bob via the slightly less pop-uppy 411:

WWE Raw scored a 4.1 cable rating last night, with a 6.6 share. The show did hours of 3.8 and 4.3, and was up .6 from last week's 3.5 rating.

Personally, I attribute all this to Foley, but I'm biased.

The Article

(edited by tasslex on 17.6.03 1720)


I donít go to sleep at night, I job to my blankets.

When my mom dies I'd like to know it was peacefully in her sleep, and not fucked to death by 38 men with AIDS.
Promote this thread!
redsoxnation
Scrapple








Since: 24.7.02

Since last post: 425 days
Last activity: 425 days
#2 Posted on
The only flaw in the Foley raised the ratings argument is that he had said the previous week on RAW that he would be back to his ordinary life after Badd Blood. Thus, that would mean he would not be on RAW this week. Also, I think they took at least a .2-.3 hit from Game 7 of the Stanley Cup Finals the week before, but still its only the second time since the prediction of the TNN president that ratings would rise that they have gone over a 3.9. They had better build up the RAW ratings now though, because its down to 2 and a half months until Monday Night Football takes the usual 25% cut of the RAW audience, thus the lower the number going into football season means the lower the rating will be once the audience is siphoned off.



Its been your privilege.
SKLOKAZOID
Bratwurst








Since: 20.3.02
From: California

Since last post: 1 day
Last activity: 2 hours
AIM:  
#3 Posted on
The ratings are still going way down overall. Let's not forget that we now consider a 4.1 to be a "bump" in the ratings when it's still less than RAW's average rating for 2001-2002. It's a trend that develops very slowly.

These are the best ratings WWE is probably going to see all year. There's only so many times they can play the "Flair un-retires!" "Foley un-retires!" "Kane unmasks!" card that they'll run out before too long and we'll be back to the normal grind that most viewers consider boring and uninspired.







"If you're asking if I would ever date a wrestler, certainly I would. However it wouldn't be good business for me to get romantically involved with anyone in any aspect of our business."
-Stephanie McMahon (Off the Record, June 3rd, 1999)
Notorious F.A.B.
Pepperoni








Since: 4.2.02
From: Dudleyville's Gay Ghetto

Since last post: 3972 days
Last activity: 3958 days
AIM:  
#4 Posted on
Given past performance they will dip again. Barring a catastrophic fuck up (and all bets are off on that,) they're not going to get much lower than what they've been averaging. I think the ratings have settled.

My theory is that the "anomalies" can be attributed to to the swing audience. Let's say 3.5 is the core "We'll watch no matter what" audience. There's probably always going to be something good enough for this group to keep watching.

When they hit 4.1, the new viewers are people who want to still like wrestling but can't take the overall product these days.

I think at least some of those viewers wanted to see what happened with Goldberg. They wanted to see if he would move on to Triple H.



It's just you against the group mind.
OMEGA
Lap cheong








Since: 18.6.02
From: North Cacalacky

Since last post: 1887 days
Last activity: 1855 days
#5 Posted on
Personally, I think Foley is the only thing that makes sense. Unless, thousands of people all of the sudden decided to care about La Resistance.



The answer to WWE's financial problems...
Big Bad
Scrapple








Since: 4.1.02
From: Dorchester, Ontario

Since last post: 9 days
Last activity: 2 days
#6 Posted on | Instant Rating: 5.54
Next week's ratings might prove once and for all if Kane has any future as a draw.



Over 1400 posts and still never a Wiener of the Day!





Well you're in your little room
and you're working on something good
but if it's really good
you're gonna need a bigger room
and when you're in the bigger room
you might not know what to do
you might have to think of
how you got started in your little room
da da da


---"Little Room," by the White Stripes
mskj
Summer sausage








Since: 10.1.02
From: Tennessee

Since last post: 914 days
Last activity: 673 days
#7 Posted on

    Originally posted by redsoxnation
    They had better build up the RAW ratings now though, because its down to 2 and a half months until Monday Night Football takes the usual 25% cut of the RAW audience, thus the lower the number going into football season means the lower the rating will be once the audience is siphoned off.


I did the MNF math. Two and a half months puts MNF starting in september. So i took June/July/August and compared them to September/October/November/December. There is a drop, but not nearly 25 percent. The drop was 10 percent last year and 12 the year before. In the last four years it has never been more than 15 percent and in 99 it was only 5 percent.

Your general point still stands, I'm just pointing out that the drop won't be very drastic. And if the quality of the product continues to improve, there may be minimal drop this year at all. Ratings are pretty stable these days.



I really can't wait to play Halo 2.
Pages: 1Thread ahead: Evolution member?
Next thread: Goldberg POOL!
Previous thread: HBK Displeased by Time Constraint
(8778 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
I wonder if this'll be like the old "Superstars" program with squash matches and the occasional name-vs.-name matchup... ...or just HeAT rehashed.
- The Thrill, WWE on WGN America (2009)
The W - Pro Wrestling - Foley = RatingsRegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board

ZimBoard
©2001-2014 Brothers Zim

This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.394 seconds.