The W
Views: 147066952
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Calendar | Color chart | Log in for more!
16.11.19 1548
The W - Current Events & Politics - Fish to Land Missing link found
This thread has 3 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
Thread rated: 8.07
Pages: 1
(630 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (7 total)
Guru Zim
SQL Dejection
Administrator








Since: 9.12.01
From: Bay City, OR

Since last post: 82 days
Last activity: 1 day
ICQ:  
#1 Posted on | Instant Rating: 8.81
http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/story/0,,1747926,00.html

This is an amazingly cool fossil to have found, because it is one of the gaps in the fossil record.



Ignorance is bliss for you, hell for me.
Promote this thread!
AWArulz
Scrapple








Since: 28.1.02
From: Louisville, KY

Since last post: 7 days
Last activity: 7 days
#2 Posted on | Instant Rating: 6.60
I only urge caution in your acceptance of this in that Nature has kind of jumped ahead on other stuff before and has not always been as pristine in their research.

I cite the Encyclopedia Brittania incident last year,
(http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/03/23/britannica_wikipedia_nature_study/), and I seem to recall another major controversy, but cannot locate it.

In any event, I wouldn't hang your hat on this discovery yet - fossils have been faked and later disproven before. They have also been simply mistaken and misinterpreted.




We'll be back right after order has been restored here in the Omni Center.
Guru Zim
SQL Dejection
Administrator








Since: 9.12.01
From: Bay City, OR

Since last post: 82 days
Last activity: 1 day
ICQ:  
#3 Posted on | Instant Rating: 8.81
Well, due to the location it was found in, I'm pretty good with ruling out faked fossil.

    The near-pristine fossil was found on Ellesmere Island, Canada, which is 600 miles from the north pole in the Arctic Circle.


I'm not sure why you are referencing Nature, which I presume you mean Nature magazine by. This was

    Scientists from the Academy of Natural Sciences in Philadelphia, the University of Chicago, and Harvard University led several expeditions into the inhospitable icy desert to search for the fossils.

    The find is the first complete evidence of an animal that was on the verge of the transition from water to land. "The find is a dream come true," said Ted Daeschler of the Academy of Natural Sciences.


I'm pretty good with those credentials





Ignorance is bliss for you, hell for me.
Guru Zim
SQL Dejection
Administrator








Since: 9.12.01
From: Bay City, OR

Since last post: 82 days
Last activity: 1 day
ICQ:  
#4 Posted on | Instant Rating: 8.81
    Originally posted by AWArulz
    I only urge caution in your acceptance of this in that Nature has kind of jumped ahead on other stuff before and has not always been as pristine in their research.

    I cite the Encyclopedia Brittania incident last year,
    (http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/03/23/britannica_wikipedia_nature_study/), and I seem to recall another major controversy, but cannot locate it.

    In any event, I wouldn't hang your hat on this discovery yet - fossils have been faked and later disproven before. They have also been simply mistaken and misinterpreted.


Also, since you are bringing up the Nature incident - it was done blind. No one was told what sources they were reading, so the Guardian is a bit off on the way they are portraying this as well.

Again though - this isn't even the same issue and I'm not sure why you brought it up here except as an attempt to discredit any science by pointing to some bad science somewhere.



Ignorance is bliss for you, hell for me.
DrDirt
Banger








Since: 8.10.03
From: flyover country

Since last post: 752 days
Last activity: 654 days
#5 Posted on | Instant Rating: 7.59
Not to speak for anyone, but there is a "feeling" among many in the intellegent design movement that the evolutionists manufacture items such as this and have since the time of Darwin.

Our cable company provides I believe Trinity Broadcasting Network, they have a regular show around 6 pm CDT spent trotting out pseudo-scientists who show "proof" that man and dinosaurs co-existed, blah, blah, blah. It is utterly fascinating to watch in a trainwreck sort of way.





Perception is reality
AWArulz
Scrapple








Since: 28.1.02
From: Louisville, KY

Since last post: 7 days
Last activity: 7 days
#6 Posted on | Instant Rating: 6.60
    Originally posted by Guru Zim
    I'm not sure why you are referencing Nature, which I presume you mean Nature magazine by.


You referenced an article refering to the front page of the weekly Nature. All I am saying is that these amazing discoveries have been discredited before. I was not going to reference Piltdown, but that was science for over 40 years - it's a "fact" in my Mom's college textbook. Transitional forms are the darling of those who have faith in the concept of evolution, and I think there's a need for a tremendous amount of proof and multiple instances before I can accept this.

This has been Ted Daeschler's pet project for many, many years, long before he had this "proof", so like every other situation, I want independent proof.

I mean, we had frickin' pictures of the weapon sites in Iraq but haven't found any actual weapons. That, of course, was W's pet project and I think we might agree that some of the data was spun. You mean old Ted, cause he's a SCIENTIST (everyone bow down!), is above that? Clearly, that hasn't always been the way it is.

I take a wait and see attitude on this.





We'll be back right after order has been restored here in the Omni Center.
Guru Zim
SQL Dejection
Administrator








Since: 9.12.01
From: Bay City, OR

Since last post: 82 days
Last activity: 1 day
ICQ:  
#7 Posted on | Instant Rating: 8.81
Well, I honestly did go back to find the reference to Nature, I just missed it. Saw it today.

That said, this wasn't in-house investigative journalism by Nature like the wikipedia article, they were just reporting it.

Piltdown hurts, just like the Korean just hurt Stem cell research. Fraud is almost never good anything. That said, there is no reason to assume fraud every time evidence is presented - it should merely go through the questioning that all evidence goes through.

I'm assuming the fact that it is being published now and that they have quotes from guys like Richard Dawkins means that this wasn't found last week, but that it has been around and people have been looking at it. I'm assuming this, because I haven't personally researched this yet.

So yes, point taken. All research should go through peer reviewing. I assumed this had happened.



Ignorance is bliss for you, hell for me.
Thread rated: 8.07
Pages: 1
Thread ahead: New Red, Blue Rings found on Uranus
Next thread: Scooter Libby says Bush OK'd Valerie Plame leak
Previous thread: DeLay leaving Congress
(630 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
I want to see Woodward confirm it before I believe it. if it he is Deep Throat, Im disappointed. Iwas hoping it would be someone more famous, Like Buchanan. Or George Bush.
- rockdotcom_2.0, "Deep Throat" revealed (2005)
The W - Current Events & Politics - Fish to Land Missing link foundRegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board

ZimBoard
©2001-2019 Brothers Zim

This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.048 seconds.