The W
Views: 100749116
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Calendar | Color chart | Log in for more!
23.11.14 0014
The W - Basketball - Finley for Shareef? Possible. Register and log in to post!
Thread rated: 5.78
Pages: 1
(972 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (1 total)
Kawshen
Liverwurst








Since: 2.1.02
From: Bronx, NY

Since last post: 1989 days
Last activity: 249 days
AIM:  
#1 Posted on | Instant Rating: 5.78
http://www.sportsline.com/nba/story/7702022/2

Shareef Abdur-Rahim is going to be a staple of trade rumors until he is finally traded. He has an expiring contract and the Blazers want to free up frontcourt playing time for their young forwards Zach Randolph and Darius Miles.

One trade not being widely discussed, but Mike Kahn suggests is a distinct possibility is a Michael Finley trade. They have similar salaries, though Finley has a few more years remaining. With Jerry Stackhouse now with the Mavericks, they have two very good players who play the same position.

Bringing Abdur-Rahim would allow him to play power forward, his preferred position and would make Dirk Nowitzki a consistent small forward, and further balancing the Maverick roster.
-----------------------------------------------

What would Dallas' starting five be? Terry-Stackhouse-Shaggy-Shareef-Dampier? Not bad.




Promote this thread!
Thread rated: 5.78
Pages: 1
Thread ahead: Pacers may trade Artest
Next thread: Kevin Willis back in Atlanta.
Previous thread: Excerpts From Investigators' Questioning of Kobe Bryant
(972 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
St. Louis did have a great stretch run, but if some of the other upsets that have happened end up affecting the automatic bids, SLU might have to settle for the NIT.
- DrewDewce, SLU (2003)
Related threads: Shareef might be traded to NY - Zach Randolph possibly headed to Milwaukee - Zach Randolph facing possible criminal charges... - More...
The W - Basketball - Finley for Shareef? Possible.Register and log in to post!

The W™ message board

ZimBoard
©2001-2014 Brothers Zim

This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.076 seconds.