Gavintzu
Summer sausage
   
   


        
      
     
Since: 2.1.02 From: Calgary ... Alberta Canada
Since last post: 2345 days Last activity: 2345 days
| #1 Posted on 14.3.02 2022.11 | Instant Rating: 0.00 | Add this to the wish list: would it be possible to have, in our profile, an option to filter out any and all posts by a wiener? So I won't have to personally slog through fifteen content-free posts a day by the same jackass? Let technology handle the problem when Manifestos and lots of hints don't seem to make a dent?
Great board, Zims rule, &tc &tc.
Past hills of chambermaids' dark bare arms and fields of muscles quilted to the bone, Right now I'm flying over, yeah right now I'm flying home.| Promote this thread! | | CRZ
Big Brother Administrator
   
   


          
         
       
Since: 9.12.01 From: ミネアポリス
Since last post: 17 hours Last activity: 7 hours
| #2 Posted on 14.3.02 2114.53 | It's a good idea (and Delphi offers it) but it involves A LOT of overhead vis a vis the database...well at least I think it does. I need to run it by our DBA. ;-)
Having said that, I think it's at least *possible* to put together some code to do it - so I'll add it to the long-term side of the project list.
CRZ Visit [slash] wrestling | 210
Blutwurst
   
   


        
      
     
Since: 2.1.02 From: St Paul, MN
Since last post: 3803 days Last activity: 3803 days
| AIM: | |
| | |
| #3 Posted on 14.3.02 2338.43 | Instant Rating: 10.00 |
That is the greatest idea I have heard in a LONG time.
 | Guru Zim
SQL Dejection Administrator
   
   


         
        
      
Since: 9.12.01 From: Bay City, OR
Since last post: 1 day Last activity: 23 hours
| AIM: | |
| | |
| #4 Posted on 15.3.02 0043.14 | Hmmmmmmmmm... I can think of an easy way to do this to block (1) user.
I could probably learn how to store an array in a text blob, then pass that into the SQL. I don't know how to do this off hand but how hard could it be?
I love it when a plan comes together | CajunMan
Boudin blanc No longer registered
   
   


         
       
     
Since: 2.1.02 From: Give me a Title shot!
Since last post: 578 days Last activity: 377 days
| #5 Posted on 15.3.02 0135.30 | Instant Rating: 0.00 | whodatzone.com (nfl/saints forum) tried this and got a overload of people usng different screen names or another way to put it one person using many screen names. However AOL does not seem to mind this situation.
Just a Warning!
In The O'Reilly Factor I Trust. | BigDaddyLoco
Scrapple
   
   


         
        
      
Since: 2.1.02
Since last post: 2 days Last activity: 5 hours
| #6 Posted on 15.3.02 1635.54 | | It's a feature I've been waiting for for quite sometime. I wouldn't use it all that often, maybe not at all if you guys...well you get the idea. | ManiacalClown
Landjager
   
   


        
       
     
Since: 2.1.02 From: Houston, TX
Since last post: 24 days Last activity: 24 days
| AIM: | |
| | |
| #7 Posted on 21.3.02 1418.48 | Instant Rating: 0.00 | Well, if you can manage to set up the block/ignore type thing, it should also be pretty easy to set up a one account per IP and/or e-mail thing to avoid a bunch of clones.
FREESERVERS = TRASH | Guru Zim
SQL Dejection Administrator
   
   


         
        
      
Since: 9.12.01 From: Bay City, OR
Since last post: 1 day Last activity: 23 hours
| AIM: | |
| | |
| #8 Posted on 21.3.02 2058.21 | IP blocks are only truly effective against Cable / DSL users. Dialup users change IPs too often.
One per-email... eh. We don't verify via e-mail at this time. That is something to think about, but it seems like it would be a bit of a pain to work into the system.
I love it when a plan comes together | ManiacalClown
Landjager
   
   


        
       
     
Since: 2.1.02 From: Houston, TX
Since last post: 24 days Last activity: 24 days
| AIM: | |
| | |
| #9 Posted on 21.3.02 2132.02 | Instant Rating: 0.00 | It's probably only something you'd need to do if the situation called for it. Someone making a bunch of different names and talking to themself, for example, would be a good time to say, "OK, let's not let this happen again..."
As for IP bans on dial-up, a lot of ISPs own a class C IP that stays static for every user. Only the last number changes between log-ons. If the system will recognize asteriks as wildcards, just replace the last number with an asterik. Only downside being that it bans everyone on that ISP. Probably also a case that wouldn't be implemented unless the situation absolutely called for it.
FREESERVERS = TRASH |
| | | | | | | | | |