"You may not know it, but if you have a wireless router, a cordless phone, remote car-door opener, baby monitor or cellphone in your house, the FCC claims the right to enter your home without a warrant at any time of the day or night in order to inspect it."
Wonder if this has been used before as a cover for other federal investigations, and if not, why not?
As of 2/28/05: 101 pounds since December 7, 2004 OFFICIAL THREE-MONTH COUNT: 112 pounds on March 9, 2005 OFFICIAL SIX-MONTH COUNT: 142 pounds on June 8, 2005 OFFICIAL ONE YEAR COUNT: 187 pounds on December 7, 2005 As of 2/27/06: 202 pounds "I've lost a heavyweight" As of 7/31/06: 224 pounds As of 12/7/08 (four years out): Still 210 pounds down! Now announcing for NBWA Championship Wrestling! *2008 NBWA Personality of the Year* www.IlliniHQ.com home of DWS Sportsnight PODCASTS, the E-Files and downstate radio home of thecubsfan!
Originally posted by Eddie FamousWonder if this has been used before as a cover for other federal investigations, and if not, why not?
If recent history is any indication, the government would prefer to just amend existing regulations to retroactively legalize doing whatever the fuck it feels like, so this is probably unnecessary. Especially given that the president is a man who has supported the tactic I describe.
Actually, if you read the article, the $125 was for speeding two years ago. It doesn't say what the punishment was for this incident. Not condoning anything, mind you, just making sure you give the real facts.