The W
Views: 99995437
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Calendar | Color chart | Log in for more!
24.10.14 1310
The W - Pro Wrestling - Draft vs. Random picks (Page 2)
This thread has 16 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
Pages: Prev 1 2(13518 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (21 total)
Notorious F.A.B.
Pepperoni








Since: 4.2.02
From: Dudleyville's Gay Ghetto

Since last post: 4027 days
Last activity: 4013 days
AIM:  
#21 Posted on
it'd be cool if they only showed the top five or ten draft picks at the beginning of raw (complete with red carpet in the ring), then have backstage interviews or commentary during matches telling us the rest of the picks in no particular order.

example: after the draft, edge and booker have a "previously scheduled" match and jr tells us vince picked edge and flair picked booker. after the match, have a backstage skit where christian tells ddp he's lucky he didn't get drafted into his division, because he would surely beat him senseless. the next match could be billy and chuck defending against the APA - if farooq and bradshaw win the titles, they don't have to break up!

if they only show the top ten picks, that establishes each brand's upper card and leaves us with something to bitch about discuss. it would also mean they don't need to have the rosters finalized by raw.



It's just you against the group mind.
I like weiners.
Pages: Prev 1 2
Pages: Prev 1 2Thread ahead: The WWF's calling out the Dirtsheets (and Smarks to an extent)
Next thread: "Wrestlemania Moments"
Previous thread: Vince to Draft Hunter's Lucy for Smackdown!
(13518 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
Ok, I made it through the rest. The 6 woman match was less uncomfortable to watch, it just had a lot of really insulting move names and unfortunate gimmick stuff that was unusually Un-PC even for wrestling. It was not enjoyable.
The W - Pro Wrestling - Draft vs. Random picks (Page 2)Register and log in to post!

The W™ message board

ZimBoard
©2001-2014 Brothers Zim

This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.441 seconds.