Big Bad
Scrapple
  
   
    
   
Since: 4.1.02
From: Dorchester, Ontario
Since last post: 1 day
Last activity: 10 hours
|  #1 Posted on 3.10.07 1212.50 | Instant Rating: 4.09 | ...but your chance to get the Predators may not be dead yet. (sports.yahoo.com)
It's surely too much to ask that idiot Bettman actually consider putting a team in a thriving hockey market rather than try to 'leave a footprint' in another southern U.S. market that doesn't care about the game.
 | | Promote this thread! |           | Chumpstain
Boerewors
Since: 21.1.02
From: Canada
Since last post: 1 day
Last activity: 13 min.
| #2 Posted on 3.10.07 1507.58 | Instant Rating: 6.68 | | I don't think anyone has a problem with a thriving hockey market getting a team. I personally have a problem with said place being Hamilton, though. Aren't the Sabres and Maple Leafs enough for southern Ontario? Spread the wealth! | mountinman44
Sujuk
Since: 8.5.02
From: San Diego, CA
Since last post: 729 days
Last activity: 576 days
| | | Y!: |  |
|
|  #3 Posted on 3.10.07 1805.59 | Instant Rating: 5.55 | Originally posted by Chumpstain
I don't think anyone has a problem with a thriving hockey market getting a team. I personally have a problem with said place being Hamilton, though. Aren't the Sabres and Maple Leafs enough for southern Ontario? Spread the wealth!
I think they should go to Winnipeg. The city has a brand-spanking new arena and I'm sure they are dying for the NHL to return. Under the new economics of the league, the franchise could thrive.
Litter is my most treacherous foe. I would like to eat its children. |
| | |
Thread rated: 5.44