Sicne there seems to be a ton of threads on how bad Smackdown has been and how hit and miss RAW has been, I was wondering, if you ran the WWE, how would you divide up the rosters to make both brands competitive yet separate from each other?
Here are both the rosters. I have taken out all non-wreslters and part timers (Rock/Foley) and permanently injured (Nowinski) and women as really, all wreslting women should be on one show and all eye candy should be on the other.
What that leaves is about 60 wrestlers. Since 30 and 30 is too easy and really toom any to have them all on TV, let's go with a maximum of 20 on each roster. This way the rosters will be a small enough roster to get everyone into and angle butr not too small that there will be a limited amount of feuds.
Also, if this has been done recently, please feel free to delete this thread (not that you need my permission to do so).
A-TRAIN AL SNOW BATISTA CHRIS BENOIT CHRIS JERICHO CHRISTIAN CHUCK PALUMBO EDGE EUGENE GARRISON CADE KANE MARK HENRY MATT HARDY MAVEN RANDY ORTON RHYNO RIC FLAIR ROB CONWAY ROSEY SHAWN MICHAELS SHELTON BENJAMIN STEVEN RICHARDS SYLVAIN GRENIER TAJIRI TEST THE HURRICANE TRIPLE H TYSON TOMKO VAL VENIS WILLIAM REGAL
AKIO BILLY GUNN BILLY KIDMAN BOOKER T BUBBA RAY DUDLEY CHARLIE HAAS CHAVO GUERRERO D-VON DUDLEY DANNY BASHAM DOUG BASHAM EDDIE GUERRERO FUNAKI HARDCORE HOLLY JAMIE NOBLE JOHN CENA JOHN BRADSHAW LAYFIELD JOHNNY STAMBOLI KURT ANGLE MARK JINDRAK MORDECAI NUNZIO ORLANDO JORDAN PAUL LONDON RENE DUPREE REY MYSTERIO RICO RIKISHI ROB VAN DAM SAKODA SCOTTY 2 HOTTY SHANNON MOORE SPIKE DUDLEY UNDERTAKER
I think you might be thinking of when WWE was trying to put together a Brock Lesnar/Lennox Lewis match a few years back. And god, doesn't it feel weird mentioning events with Brock Lesnar as "a few years back"?