The W
Views: 101483030
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Calendar | Color chart | Log in for more!
20.12.14 1712
The W - Baseball - Derrick Lee to the Braves
This thread has 13 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
Thread rated: 5.49
Pages: 1
(193 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (7 total)
TheOldMan
Landjager








Since: 13.2.03
From: Chicago

Since last post: 173 days
Last activity: 9 days
#1 Posted on | Instant Rating: 4.43
Lee and cash for three minor league pitchers

Cubs say farewell to a classy guy who looked to be getting his stroke going - before missing the last few games to get an epidural for his back. Braves get a bat for the stretch run to try and make up for the loss of Chipper. Braves are also in Chicago for a series starting Friday, so Lee should get a proper sendoff from the fans.

And on our side, the groundhog looked out and told Lou there will be 5 more weeks of seeing if Xavier Nady can be Chicago's $4m/year first baseman next season. (Spoiler Alert: No.)

(edited by TheOldMan on 18.8.10 1714)


Promote this thread!
djp
Morcilla








Since: 16.2.07
From: 3rd Floor, NW window

Since last post: 188 days
Last activity: 35 days
#2 Posted on | Instant Rating: 4.58
I see where Derek Lee rejected a trade that would have sent him to the Angels at the deadline, so he must have had a change of heart.

I don't think he was having that great of a season but he's a terrific defender and a class act.
redsoxnation
Scrapple








Since: 24.7.02

Since last post: 537 days
Last activity: 537 days
#3 Posted on | Instant Rating: 5.91
    Originally posted by djp
    I see where Derek Lee rejected a trade that would have sent him to the Angels at the deadline, so he must have had a change of heart.

    I don't think he was having that great of a season but he's a terrific defender and a class act.







Biggest change of heart: Angels were floundering about 7 behind the Rangers at the time he rejected that trade while the Braves are in 1st by 2.5 when he accepted this trade.
thecubsfan
Scrapple
Moderator








Since: 10.12.01
From: Aurora, IL

Since last post: 1 day
Last activity: 47 min.
#4 Posted on | Instant Rating: 10.00
D Lee said as much at the press conference; he wasn't going to uproot his family unless he felt he team had a strong chance at the playoffs, and he looks to have pegged the Angels right.

Management loves Lee (and Ted Lilly) and will likely try to get them back in free agency. But I do appreciate them actually getting people for them rather than playing out the string with guys who are (still) not likely coming back.

There's still about two weeks until the wavier deadline and I'm not sure they're done. Cubs would still love to move the guys with huge deals (Soriano, Fukudome, Zambrano), though that's obviously unlikely to happen. But Nady might not last the rest of the season as 1B, since there's been talk of moving him since May and the Cubs haven't asked for much more than lottery ticket minor league pitchers in their recent deals. Hendry also signed like he actually try to pick up a reliever who they could keep for next season, because they're really down on how that's gone this year.



thecubsfan.com - luchablog
It's False
Scrapple








Since: 20.6.02
From: I am the Tag Team Champions!

Since last post: 4 days
Last activity: 2 hours
#5 Posted on | Instant Rating: 4.51
    Originally posted by djp
    I see where Derek Lee rejected a trade that would have sent him to the Angels at the deadline, so he must have had a change of heart.


Can't blame him considering how far off the Angels are. Also can't say I'm too upset about it. I'd rather the Halos take a shot at signing Carl Crawford this winter than see them give up even more young prospects, because they're running woefully short in that department.

The Cubs might as well take a shot on dumping Carlos Zambrano too while they're at it. If they're going to tease blowing up the team, they might as well go all the way with it.




Mentlegen!
BigDaddyLoco
Scrapple








Since: 2.1.02

Since last post: 1 day
Last activity: 4 hours
#6 Posted on | Instant Rating: 3.71
    Originally posted by It's False

    The Cubs might as well take a shot on dumping Carlos Zambrano too while they're at it. If they're going to tease blowing up the team, they might as well go all the way with it.


The only way that's happening is if the Cubs eat all the money owed on that deal and take back crappy players. Z is going to be a Cub for quite awhile.

spf
Scrapple








Since: 2.1.02
From: The Las Vegas of Canada

Since last post: 1 day
Last activity: 19 hours
AIM:  
#7 Posted on | Instant Rating: 5.16
    Originally posted by It's False
      Originally posted by djp
      I see where Derek Lee rejected a trade that would have sent him to the Angels at the deadline, so he must have had a change of heart.


    Can't blame him considering how far off the Angels are. Also can't say I'm too upset about it. I'd rather the Halos take a shot at signing Carl Crawford this winter than see them give up even more young prospects, because they're running woefully short in that department.

    The Cubs might as well take a shot on dumping Carlos Zambrano too while they're at it. If they're going to tease blowing up the team, they might as well go all the way with it.

I guarantee that if some team claimed Zambrano off waivers the Cubs would do like the Blue Jays did with Alex Rios last year and say "He's yours!"



2007 and 2008 W-League Fantasy Football champion!
Thread rated: 5.49
Pages: 1
Thread ahead: Girardi to Cubs?
Next thread: Strasburg done for 2011?
Previous thread: Roger Clemens Indicted For Perjury
(193 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
Just a warning: I may not be able to make it... got roped into a party. No one wants to be there, though, so there's still a shot.
Related threads: So Long Tom Glavine - ...Hey Hey Hey Like Being Stoned - Skip Caray (1939-2008) - More...
The W - Baseball - Derrick Lee to the BravesRegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board

ZimBoard
©2001-2014 Brothers Zim

This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.09 seconds.