The W
Views: 99951415
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Calendar | Color chart | Log in for more!
@565 .beats
The W - Current Events & Politics - Democratic Primary Debates
This thread has 27 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
Thread rated: 6.68
Pages: 1
(1584 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (8 total)
Von Maestro
Boudin rouge








Since: 6.1.04
From: New York

Since last post: 224 days
Last activity: 18 hours
#1 Posted on
http://story.news.yahoo.com/ news?tmpl=story&cid=514& e=2&u=/ap/20040112/ap_on_el_pr/ democrats_debate

Without getting into the ramifications of Dean's lack of minority appointees, I wanted to know why Al Sharpton is treated as an equal on this large a political stage? Taking into account his past foibles (i.e. Tawana Brawley) & also looking at the recent report by the NY Times over the weekend (http://story.news.yahoo.com/ news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/ 20040110/ap_on_el_pr/ sharpton_money_2), why is Sharpton still in this thing & not being raked over the coals as any of the other candidates would have been?

The simple answer is that offending Sharpton & calling him on these things (which is what Dean & any other candidate should do when Sharpton starts to attack) would cost these candidates the Black vote. The problem with that theory is that I can not accept that Al Sharpton is the voice of the Black community & would influence their votes one way or the other (add Jesse Jackson & Louis Farakkan into that list!).

I guess what I want to know is why is this person seemingly exempt from the same scrutiny that every other candidate is subject to? Is it simply because he is Black, or is there something else here??
Promote this thread!
OlFuzzyBastard
Knackwurst








Since: 28.4.02
From: Pittsburgh, PA

Since last post: 15 days
Last activity: 12 days
AIM:  
#2 Posted on | Instant Rating: 6.55
Al Sharpton's exempt from scrutiny? That's news to me.

The reason that no one's paying any real attention to the Sharpton campaign is the same reason that no one's paying any real attention to Dennis Kucinich's campaign or Carol Mosely-Braun's campaign. They have so little of a chance of actually winning the nomination that it isn't worth the effort.



THE 2003 FUZZIES!
Vote now in the only awards that matter! They're cooler than being cool!

Von Maestro
Boudin rouge








Since: 6.1.04
From: New York

Since last post: 224 days
Last activity: 18 hours
#3 Posted on
Come on OFB, you know what I'm talking about.

When Al Sharpton levels accusations against Howard Dean on a nationally televised debate & instead of (rightfully) attacking Sharpton & defending himself, Dean just sits there taking it, there is something wrong with that picture.

This has nothing to do with his chances of winning, this has to do with the other candidates unwillingness to call Sharpton on what he has done & what he stands for. Yet they just sit back & take his accusations without firing back.

I want to know why that is??
rockdotcom_2.0
Frankfurter








Since: 9.1.02
From: Virginia Beach Va

Since last post: 581 days
Last activity: 196 days
AIM:  
#4 Posted on | Instant Rating: 7.67
OFB already answered your question, Maestro. You want a larger one? Its simple, Sharpton has nothing to lose. He knows this, they know this. That makes him dangerous, thats why none of the major candidates want to get down and dirty with him. its not worth their time. Especially Dean, hes the front runner. Good enough?

I know you want to scream "ITS BECAUSE HES BLACK!!!" and that pisses you off. Hey I can understand, but thats politics.
Jaguar
Knackwurst








Since: 23.1.02
From: Phoenix, AZ

Since last post: 198 days
Last activity: 198 days
#5 Posted on | Instant Rating: 5.30
If you respond to Sharpton's attacks you only accomplish one of two things: Either you legitimize him and pull him up to your level, or you're lowering your credibility and sinking to his level. Neither of those things are good for the front runners in the campaign.

-Jag



"I'm going to go now and demand beer money from my representative. We simply must deal with the problem of my sobriety." - PalpatineW
DrDirt
Banger








Since: 8.10.03
From: flyover country

Since last post: 1 hour
Last activity: 11 min.
#6 Posted on | Instant Rating: 7.54
    Originally posted by Jaguar
    If you respond to Sharpton's attacks you only accomplish one of two things: Either you legitimize him and pull him up to your level, or you're lowering your credibility and sinking to his level. Neither of those things are good for the front runners in the campaign.

    -Jag


Well said. I get tired of everytime something like this occurs, people want to inject race into it. Slowly, IMO, we are creeping towards the time when race dimishes in importance.

Sharpton made an attack, and Dean responded. He tried race baiting and nothing really happened. That is progress to me.



Perception is reality
Freeway
Scrapple








Since: 3.1.02
From: Calgary

Since last post: 305 days
Last activity: 2 days
#7 Posted on | Instant Rating: 5.96
The guys on Crossfire today basically stated the same thing: Dean can't afford to verbally bitchslap Sharpton or to say they can inject race into ANYTHING, simply because it's still such a touchy issue and there's votes to be had.



FLAMES: 21-12-3-3 for 48 points
It took the team until March 5th to get 21 wins last year
ScreamingHeadGuy
Frankfurter








Since: 1.2.02
From: Appleton, WI

Since last post: 748 days
Last activity: 748 days
#8 Posted on | Instant Rating: 6.62
But the correct answer is: "Al, we're talking about VERMONT. It's impossible to find a cabinet-level qualified black person. Hell, it's nearly impossible to find ANY black person."

Trust me, it's damn hard to have "diversity" when over 95% of the populace is white.



Fashion Reporter Extraordinaire

Fear not the future. For that is where your dreams will come true.

Thread rated: 6.68
Pages: 1
Thread ahead: Dean losing ground in NH
Next thread: Dean shows them retirees who's boss
Previous thread: CNN: Dean Within 5 Pts of Bush
(1584 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
And that went swimmingly when we were invading countries to change regimes too.
The W - Current Events & Politics - Democratic Primary DebatesRegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board

ZimBoard
©2001-2014 Brothers Zim

This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.11 seconds.