The W
Views: 100900868
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Calendar | Color chart | Log in for more!
27.11.14 0609
The W - Current Events & Politics - Debate Reaction Thread (Page 4)
This thread has 98 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
Thread rated: 4.81
Pages: Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
(1061 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (125 total)
TheMASKEDComputerGeek
Chourico








Since: 7.1.02
From: Franklin, Wisconsin

Since last post: 115 days
Last activity: 11 hours
AIM:  
#61 Posted on | Instant Rating: 3.10
    Originally posted by Grimis
    -The personal story about the woman who lost her husband, and his chat with them. It was a very touching and moving part when actually it was rather unexepcted. It's a personal touch that nobody would believe coming from Kerry



This was actually the absolute worst "See? I'm compassionate!" play of all time. There was nothing about that part of the speech that seemed remotely genuine, and he also said something to the effect of "You know, it's hard work to try and love her as best I can, knowing full well that the decision I made caused her loved one to be in harm's way." Now if that isn't tear-jerking award-winning compassionate Presidential man-love, I don't know what is.



Let's skip stones!
- David Wain

[html]www.getofftheshed.net/td2
JOIN THE REVOLUTION!!!
Mayhem
Scrapple








Since: 25.4.03
From: Nashville, TN

Since last post: 29 days
Last activity: 1 day
#62 Posted on | Instant Rating: 4.71
    Originally posted by TheMASKEDComputerGeek
      Originally posted by Grimis
      -The personal story about the woman who lost her husband, and his chat with them. It was a very touching and moving part when actually it was rather unexepcted. It's a personal touch that nobody would believe coming from Kerry



    This was actually the absolute worst "See? I'm compassionate!" play of all time. There was nothing about that part of the speech that seemed remotely genuine, and he also said something to the effect of "You know, it's hard work to try and love her as best I can, knowing full well that the decision I made caused her loved one to be in harm's way." Now if that isn't tear-jerking award-winning compassionate Presidential man-love, I don't know what is.


Exaclty ... that comment made me nauseous ... Bush was trying to play the sympathy card and he failed.



Barbwire Mike
Boudin rouge








Since: 6.11.03
From: Dudleyville

Since last post: 3334 days
Last activity: 3327 days
#63 Posted on | Instant Rating: 3.84
I was crushed when W told the "widowed wife" story. Came off just like those stomach-churningly bogus yarns Gore told of 80 year old women begging him to save health care because they were eating cat food so they could afford prescriptions.

Not well played, George.



Lethalwrestling.com: If you don't read us, you're probably gay
Grimis
Scrapple








Since: 11.7.02
From: MD

Since last post: 1304 days
Last activity: 1101 days
#64 Posted on | Instant Rating: 7.29
    Originally posted by Battlezone
    Grimis, I'm just curious. These two quotes seem to suggest that when CBS and the other nets say Kerry won, it's That Damn Liberal Media in action. But when *Fox News* says Kerry won, it's a business "trying to make a buck". Am I reading that wrong?
I figured from the get go that regardless of how the debate went last night, the media was going to declare it a Kerry victory and that the race was going to tighten up. It's a ratings ploy, pure and simple.

Regardless of who won, Kerry is in trouble. His performance last night was not a good one. Esepcially if the numbers AWA posted are true(and I have no reason to believe right now that they are because of this statement from the article:

Respondents were first interviewed September 28-29, 2004, when they indicated there was some chance they would watch tonight's debate and were willing to be called back.

This harms the accuracy of the poll since this is more self-selected than a normal poll.



evilwaldo
Lap cheong








Since: 7.2.02
From: New York, NY

Since last post: 3442 days
Last activity: 3223 days
AIM:  
#65 Posted on | Instant Rating: 0.00
It seemed to me as though Kerry came off as more 'presidential' than Bush which is not going to help either base but may sway the undecideds. Bush did not seem to have control of the situation which worries me as he is the president and should have been more prepared and shown up with his A game.

The rules violation that Grimis mentions is that in the 32 pages of rules there was not supposed to be any time for rebuttals, just a couple of minutes to answer the questions and state their views. It was negotiated by both sides.

Can I vote for Lehrer?



Are you a professional halfwit or talented amateur?
LionJeetSingh
Chourico








Since: 3.3.03

Since last post: 3340 days
Last activity: 3167 days
#66 Posted on | Instant Rating: 1.39
"If you were a student of political science, you would know that data is not crap."


I was a political science major and I am not aware if all data is crap or not.





Vut Joo Talkin?
fuelinjected
Banger








Since: 12.10.02
From: Canada

Since last post: 3297 days
Last activity: 3297 days
#67 Posted on | Instant Rating: 4.90
I thought Kerry came across very well but the image of the cowboy is so engrained in American culture that Kerry may not be able to overcome it even though Bush is no more of a 'cowboy' then Kerry is. If I were Kerry, I would have spent money exposing Bush's faux-everyman image that started with his father's fake image.

I don't see that either guy ran away with anything but for the undecided voters who watched, John Kerry looked and spoke like a President. If they were on the fence about him, I can see them voting for him now.

It may all sound so trivial but the last election was decided on "Gore is boring - Bush is funny".



Classic Rock
"Remember the commercial, that Indian had the tear in his eye for pollution? He wasn't crying for pollution, you took his land and ****ed his wife! I don't think he was crying cause there was a ****ing can on the ground ... You can **** my wife but that can's gotta go!"

"I used to work making minimum wage came up to about $200 a week and then they'd take out $50 in taxes ... Fifty dollars a week in taxes? What do I get for my tax money? All the free street light in the world! Yeah, as far as I'm concerned you can give everybody a candle and give me my ****ing fifty dollars back!"
Grimis
Scrapple








Since: 11.7.02
From: MD

Since last post: 1304 days
Last activity: 1101 days
#68 Posted on | Instant Rating: 7.29
    Originally posted by evilwaldo
    The rules violation that Grimis mentions is that in the 32 pages of rules there was not supposed to be any time for rebuttals, just a couple of minutes to answer the questions and state their views. It was negotiated by both sides.
Well here's the beef and it depends on whether or not you consider those to be rebuttals per se. The President did indicate more than once(and Kerry did as well) that he wished to continue the discussion, and it was at Lehrer's discretion that the rebuttal took place. Technically, that is not a rules violation, and I certainly wouldn't want to be the one to say that into a microphone in the middle of the debate.



AWArulz
Knackwurst








Since: 28.1.02
From: Louisville, KY

Since last post: 5 days
Last activity: 26 min.
AIM:  
Y!:
#69 Posted on | Instant Rating: 6.30
    Originally posted by Barbwire Mike
    I was crushed when W told the "widowed wife" story. Came off just like those stomach-churningly bogus yarns Gore told of 80 year old women begging him to save health care because they were eating cat food so they could afford prescriptions.

    Not well played, George.


Really? I admit I wasn't listening much last night Intense game of Pokemon Puzzle League - but MrsAWA, admittedly more conservative than I, was actually crying at that point.



Now, is it ok for me yell THEATRE! in a crowded fire?
evilwaldo
Lap cheong








Since: 7.2.02
From: New York, NY

Since last post: 3442 days
Last activity: 3223 days
AIM:  
#70 Posted on | Instant Rating: 0.00
    Originally posted by Grimis
      Originally posted by evilwaldo
      The rules violation that Grimis mentions is that in the 32 pages of rules there was not supposed to be any time for rebuttals, just a couple of minutes to answer the questions and state their views. It was negotiated by both sides.
    Well here's the beef and it depends on whether or not you consider those to be rebuttals per se. The President did indicate more than once(and Kerry did as well) that he wished to continue the discussion, and it was at Lehrer's discretion that the rebuttal took place. Technically, that is not a rules violation, and I certainly wouldn't want to be the one to say that into a microphone in the middle of the debate.


Thanks for mentioning that. I was wondering why Lehrer handled that so well. There had to have been a contingency somewhere.




Are you a professional halfwit or talented amateur?
PalpatineW
Lap cheong








Since: 2.1.02
From: Getting Rowdy

Since last post: 2865 days
Last activity: 2707 days
AIM:  
#71 Posted on | Instant Rating: 9.00
    Originally posted by AWArulz
      Originally posted by Barbwire Mike
      I was crushed when W told the "widowed wife" story. Came off just like those stomach-churningly bogus yarns Gore told of 80 year old women begging him to save health care because they were eating cat food so they could afford prescriptions.

      Not well played, George.


    Really? I admit I wasn't listening much last night Intense game of Pokemon Puzzle League - but MrsAWA, admittedly more conservative than I, was actually crying at that point.


Probably no one in this thread is a good judge on this one. Unless we have some undecided women out there.

People are hammering Bush on his performance, and it was clearly a bad "performance," but I'm still not convinced Kerry killed him in the debate. Kerry won the battle of image, yes. But the public is so inoculated to Bush's inability to speak that I'm not sure how much water that carries. We "know" that Bush is verbally inept. At what point do people stop caring?

The question I have is, Were voters paying more attention to Bush's flustered demeanor, or to his substantive clashes with Kerry? I still say Bush came across well on the issues. He hit Kerry on Korea, he hit Kerry on the issue of allies, and he even corrected Kerry a couple times. Bush also seemed serious in a way that Kerry did not. It's about time that someone called the supposed diplomat on his stupid (and politically stupid) insults of Allawi, and the "window dressing" "coerced and bribed" allies. The man is playing politics a little too much here, and not only do I find it repulsive, I think it came back just a little bit to bite him in the ass.

But, time will tell, eh?



In Theo We Trust
asteroidboy
Andouille








Since: 22.1.02
From: Texas

Since last post: 1464 days
Last activity: 372 days
#72 Posted on | Instant Rating: 5.06
    Originally posted by Grimis
    I figured from the get go that regardless of how the debate went last night, the media was going to declare it a Kerry victory and that the race was going to tighten up. It's a ratings ploy, pure and simple.


Definintely. If it's a blowout, people quit watching. If Bush were down, at least some of the outlets would have been gushing over his emotion and candor. I think Kerry won last night, but unless he had completely fallen on his face, he would have won it anyway.

Remember, regardless of what bias you attribute to the TV media, they're ALL biased towards sensationalism. And nothing's more sensational than a come-from-behind story, even if they have to manufacture one.



-- Asteroid Boy

Now on 411


Wiener of the day: 23.7.02, 3.12.03

"If you want me to watch the shows, buy tickets when you come to town, buy t-shirts, and pay for a PPV every three days, you bet your ass I'm going to hard to impress. And when you give me stuff that blows and then tell me I don't get a vote on sharing that opinion, I'm going to tell you to go catch an STD." - Hogan's My Dad

"My brother saw the Undertaker walking through an airport." - Rex
"Was he no-selling?" - Me


BigSteve
Pepperoni








Since: 23.7.04
From: Baltimore, MD

Since last post: 2876 days
Last activity: 2604 days
#73 Posted on | Instant Rating: 1.16
Did Kerry actually give a plan on Iraq, other than 'let's get them out of there ASAP'? Bush gave a plan, but Kerry had none. Kerry wanted bi-lateral talks with North Korea, but also wondered why the president wasn't being as hard on North Korea as he was being on Iraq. Bush didn't win the 'debate', but he did win the battle of getting his missages across, even of they were a little mexed at times.
evilwaldo
Lap cheong








Since: 7.2.02
From: New York, NY

Since last post: 3442 days
Last activity: 3223 days
AIM:  
#74 Posted on | Instant Rating: 0.00
    Originally posted by PalpatineW
      Originally posted by AWArulz
        Originally posted by Barbwire Mike
        I was crushed when W told the "widowed wife" story. Came off just like those stomach-churningly bogus yarns Gore told of 80 year old women begging him to save health care because they were eating cat food so they could afford prescriptions.

        Not well played, George.


      Really? I admit I wasn't listening much last night Intense game of Pokemon Puzzle League - but MrsAWA, admittedly more conservative than I, was actually crying at that point.


    Probably no one in this thread is a good judge on this one. Unless we have some undecided women out there.

    People are hammering Bush on his performance, and it was clearly a bad "performance," but I'm still not convinced Kerry killed him in the debate. Kerry won the battle of image, yes. But the public is so inoculated to Bush's inability to speak that I'm not sure how much water that carries. We "know" that Bush is verbally inept. At what point do people stop caring?

    The question I have is, Were voters paying more attention to Bush's flustered demeanor, or to his substantive clashes with Kerry? I still say Bush came across well on the issues. He hit Kerry on Korea, he hit Kerry on the issue of allies, and he even corrected Kerry a couple times. Bush also seemed serious in a way that Kerry did not. It's about time that someone called the supposed diplomat on his stupid (and politically stupid) insults of Allawi, and the "window dressing" "coerced and bribed" allies. The man is playing politics a little too much here, and not only do I find it repulsive, I think it came back just a little bit to bite him in the ass.

    But, time will tell, eh?


Brit Hume (?) on Foxnews afterwards mentioned, and rightly so, that Bush looked small behind the podium whereas Kerry filled the entire TV screen. I think it is a combination of how a person looks and the message conveyed with looks being maybe 2/3rds and message 1/3rd. It is hard for a weak looking person to make an effective point and I think that is where Bush had problems.

(edited by evilwaldo on 1.10.04 1731)


Are you a professional halfwit or talented amateur?
Eddie Famous
Andouille








Since: 11.12.01
From: Catlin IL

Since last post: 369 days
Last activity: 363 days
#75 Posted on | Instant Rating: 6.69

    Originally posted by pieman
      Originally posted by Eddie Famous
      Overall I call an even round, in that few will form or change an opinion on this one.


    Well, in our house you would be incorrect, Mr. Famous.


I imagine I would be incorrect in just about ANYONE's household or I'd be invited to more parties.

    Originally posted by pieman
    My wife was relatively undecided before last night. At about the half-way point, she threw up her hands and admitted that Bush was performing poorly. In fact, we thought he was acting at about a second or third grade level with some of his mannerisms and facial expressions. Put one in the Kerry column for my wife who was formerly undecided.


Then, as per my post, your wife is one of the few. I truly think that Kerry will have a better chance to swing voters when the focus gets to domestic policies.



"In the sky. Lord, in the sky..."
Malarky
Bauerwurst








Since: 19.8.04

Since last post: 3701 days
Last activity: 3698 days
#76 Posted on | Instant Rating: 2.33
    Originally posted by Barbwire Mike
    I was crushed when W told the "widowed wife" story. Came off just like those stomach-churningly bogus yarns Gore told of 80 year old women begging him to save health care because they were eating cat food so they could afford prescriptions.

    Not well played, George.


Agreed. It was cringeworthy. And watching him trying to suppress his trademark smirk as he told said anecdote was even worse. That about said it all.
Teppan-Yaki
Pepperoni








Since: 28.6.02

Since last post: 972 days
Last activity: 942 days
#77 Posted on | Instant Rating: 6.20
Just remember -- being the President is "hard work." And Mr. Kerry?



(edited by Teppan-Yaki on 1.10.04 1839)
SlipperyPete
Bauerwurst








Since: 13.8.04

Since last post: 3635 days
Last activity: 3635 days
#78 Posted on | Instant Rating: 1.56
When all the dust settles down I think the key moment of the debate will be Kerry's "global test" remark. Bush jumped on that one right away and they will probably pound the issue over and over until election day. Not to mention the fact that Kerry has contradicted himself on this issue in the past.

The responses from the two camps is also interesting, as the DNC released a video of nothing but Bush's face from the debate at various points where he was annoyed. The RNC released a video of Kerry's words from the debate. If you're running a campaign for a bronzed, botoxed Lurch and you decide to focus on style instead of substance, isn't that pretty well admitting that you have no substance to speak of?
Dahak
Frankfurter








Since: 12.5.02
From: Junction City OR.

Since last post: 2061 days
Last activity: 1714 days
#79 Posted on | Instant Rating: 1.89
I am a Bush supporter but I would say that Kerry won last night. Not a big win but enough to tighten the race up.
But Kerry actually pissed me off more last night. With his,"I talked to Mark in Wisconsin. Mary in Florida. Scott in Iowa" crap. Gee what a shock that the important battleground states got mentioned. So Kerry doesn't care about you if you live in Vermont or Nebraska since he already knows how they will vote? A debate really isn't the time to pander.




Marge I am just trying to get into heaven not run for Jesus.
AWArulz
Knackwurst








Since: 28.1.02
From: Louisville, KY

Since last post: 5 days
Last activity: 26 min.
AIM:  
Y!:
#80 Posted on | Instant Rating: 6.30
I guess for me, in the final analysis, it was:

Kerry would only take pre-emptive action for any reason if it passed the 'Global test', which i can only interpret as being UN approval.

the President said he would act as needed to protect Americans.

I want a president who doesn't need permission from Jouques to take a leak. So, for me, that was the whole debate.

Plus, it's the only thing I woke up for. :-)




Now, is it ok for me yell THEATRE! in a crowded fire?
Pages: Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Thread rated: 4.81
Pages: Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Thread ahead: This is why we are on the offensive....
Next thread: Teacher fired for putting up Bush's picture
Previous thread: Obituary endorsing Kerry
(1061 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
Uh, some dickbags who have questionable charity practices (tl;dr on the latter link, didn't watch the video, Fox should get to the point)
- drjayphd, Party Crashers! (2009)
The W - Current Events & Politics - Debate Reaction Thread (Page 4)Register and log in to post!

The W™ message board

ZimBoard
©2001-2014 Brothers Zim

This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.178 seconds.